TC Bertha

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#321 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Jul 02, 2008 8:35 am

Image

Image

For a tropical wave, early in July, and in the EATL, it looks very well organized.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#322 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Jul 02, 2008 8:39 am

I don't see what you're seeing, Chris... at leats not yet (I want to see what you're seeing... I want to watch fireworks on Friday, lol)
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#323 Postby KWT » Wed Jul 02, 2008 8:41 am

Maybe Frank but the shear pattern looks fairly low, low enough for development the main problem at least until 40W from about 25-30W will be the lower temps in that region, should prevent much development.
There does seem to be a little area of stable air fairly close by which may also help but who knows.

Anyway as I've said before I don't expect any development till 40W, then it will have a real shot back in the warmer seas again, may just have to weather the cooler waters.

wxman, ok thats fair enough, the LLC to the east isn't strong as you say but it is close to that small area of convection which may help to sustain it for a little while.
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

Re: INVEST 92L in the Eastern Atlantic

#324 Postby deltadog03 » Wed Jul 02, 2008 8:46 am

I still think this has a descent chance at developing, but nearly as quickly as models show it. This looks fairly raggid as wxman was saying. IMO I feel that models are jumping on this too quickly...(as usually in the eastern atl.)
0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15446
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

#325 Postby NDG » Wed Jul 02, 2008 8:49 am

It would had been nice if station 13001 would had been working, the center would be passing right over it.
Image
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#326 Postby KWT » Wed Jul 02, 2008 8:55 am

I agree Deltadog and given it will slowly move into an area of cooler waters I don't think that argues too well for it to get fast strong but equally I don't think its going to weaken into a naked swirl like I've heard some people say.

NDG, yep the center is going to go right over that, thats a good place to put it though!
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#327 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Jul 02, 2008 8:57 am

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re:

#328 Postby wxman57 » Wed Jul 02, 2008 8:58 am

Derek Ortt wrote:I don't see what you're seeing, wxman57... at least not yet (I want to see what you're seeing... I want to watch fireworks on Friday, lol)


We're staring at high-res meteosat loops with images every 15 minutes trying to find the center. Originally (before the sun got high enough to see the low clouds better), I thought that the center looked to be a good bit farther west. But that curvature is now gone. We think we can see some kind of weak LLC near 11.5-12N around 21W near the convective burst. But the convective burst doesn't seem to be rotating around a center, it's just moving off to the northwest.

All in all, I feel a lot better about it not developing the way it appears now. It looked more impressive yesterday.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#329 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Jul 02, 2008 9:01 am

Image
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: Re:

#330 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Jul 02, 2008 9:01 am

wxman57 wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:I don't see what you're seeing, wxman57... at least not yet (I want to see what you're seeing... I want to watch fireworks on Friday, lol)


We're staring at high-res meteosat loops with images every 15 minutes trying to find the center. Originally (before the sun got high enough to see the low clouds better), I thought that the center looked to be a good bit farther west. But that curvature is now gone. We think we can see some kind of weak LLC near 11.5-12N around 21W near the convective burst. But the convective burst doesn't seem to be rotating around a center, it's just moving off to the northwest.

All in all, I feel a lot better about it not developing the way it appears now. It looked more impressive yesterday.


WELL HERE is the last scat image..

center farther east but not much ..

Image
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#331 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Jul 02, 2008 9:04 am

it was 6 hours ago .. still shows the convection farther west slightly away from the center. but does not mean it wont refire
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: INVEST 92L in the Eastern Atlantic

#332 Postby wxman57 » Wed Jul 02, 2008 9:10 am

Here's a visible shot from my GARP workstation with where we think a weak LLC may reside (inside red circle). Not very organized. A few thunderstorms barely hanging on, but there doesn't appear to be any inflow to sustain convection near the center.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#333 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Wed Jul 02, 2008 9:18 am

Yeah, this thing is not looking so good this morning. Chances of development definitely appear to have gone down a bit since last night, and unless it can start coming back, it probably will not develop into any thing of significance in the short term.
0 likes   

User avatar
boca
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6367
Age: 60
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:49 am
Location: Boca Raton,FL

Re: INVEST 92L in the Eastern Atlantic

#334 Postby boca » Wed Jul 02, 2008 9:19 am

Hey wxman57 this can be a turning point for you.Planning a vacation and 92L not developing.I have my fingers crossed for you.
0 likes   

User avatar
DESTRUCTION5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4423
Age: 43
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
Location: Stuart, FL

Re: INVEST 92L in the Eastern Atlantic

#335 Postby DESTRUCTION5 » Wed Jul 02, 2008 9:21 am

boca wrote:Hey wxman57 this can be a turning point for you.Planning a vacation and 92L not developing.I have my fingers crossed for you.



No Offense to Wxman but is it me or does anyone else think that Hurricane forecasters should take thier Vacations in off season? LOL
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: INVEST 92L in the Eastern Atlantic

#336 Postby gatorcane » Wed Jul 02, 2008 9:22 am

So WxMan, I am seeing "It's Dead Jim" in the not so distant future :D Again, this doesn't surprise me one bit. I'm still sticking with my forecast of a strong tropical wave eventually becoming a pulsating small blob of convection working West across the Atlantic which should be of no concern to any landmass.

Note, I'm sure invests like 92L developed in years past especially long ago. But nobody (cared) or tracked them when they were thousands of miles away from affecting any landmass.

I'm still awaiting mid August. Next invest please.
Last edited by gatorcane on Wed Jul 02, 2008 9:24 am, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

Re: INVEST 92L in the Eastern Atlantic

#337 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Wed Jul 02, 2008 9:23 am

DESTRUCTION5 wrote:
boca wrote:Hey wxman57 this can be a turning point for you.Planning a vacation and 92L not developing.I have my fingers crossed for you.



No Offense to Wxman but is it me or does anyone else think that Hurricane forecasters should take thier Vacations in off season? LOL


Thats what I was thinking? Anyway if this looks any worst then we can call in Dr.McCoy!
0 likes   

User avatar
Category 5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10074
Age: 35
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:00 pm
Location: New Brunswick, NJ
Contact:

Re: INVEST 92L in the Eastern Atlantic

#338 Postby Category 5 » Wed Jul 02, 2008 9:27 am

Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:
DESTRUCTION5 wrote:
boca wrote:Hey wxman57 this can be a turning point for you.Planning a vacation and 92L not developing.I have my fingers crossed for you.



No Offense to Wxman but is it me or does anyone else think that Hurricane forecasters should take thier Vacations in off season? LOL


Thats what I was thinking? Anyway if this looks any worst then we can call in Dr.McCoy!


I'm sure he has somebody to replace him. He can take a vacation whenever he chooses. And I'm sure theres better things to talk about then when Wxman should take his vacation.
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#339 Postby Chacor » Wed Jul 02, 2008 9:28 am

It's a bit silly to be attacking Wxman57 for taking a vacation. He/forecasters deserves it just as much, if not more, than anyone else.
0 likes   

User avatar
PTrackerLA
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5277
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
Location: Lafayette, LA

Re: INVEST 92L in the Eastern Atlantic

#340 Postby PTrackerLA » Wed Jul 02, 2008 9:29 am

First time I see this today, looks like it's in the *poof* phase now. Next.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests