tolakram wrote:http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis/online/loop_640.asp?product=tropical_ge_1km_center_relative_vis_floater
View last 5 frames. I dunno, maybe a little north of west...
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Moderator: S2k Moderators
tolakram wrote:http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis/online/loop_640.asp?product=tropical_ge_1km_center_relative_vis_floater
View last 5 frames. I dunno, maybe a little north of west...
Decomdoug wrote:I am pretty sure 91L's only real value is as a practice exercise. However it is good to have a non-threatening system to watch.
wxman57 wrote:Decomdoug wrote:I am pretty sure 91L's only real value is as a practice exercise. However it is good to have a non-threatening system to watch.
I was going to suggest that but last time I suggested that the NHC might just want to use a questionable system just as a live test of procedures, etc., you'd think I'd committed some sort of horrible crime.In fact, we just used it to test our designation procedures and web page.
In any case, the convection is collapsing and the low-level swirl is already dissipating. Nothing to get excited about.
MortisFL wrote:HURAKAN wrote:Why would it be upgraded to an invest if no development was ancitipated?![]()
I doesn't make sense.
Because it looks good enough at this present time to warrant it an invest?
HURAKAN wrote:Why would it be upgraded to an invest if no development was ancitipated?![]()
I doesn't make sense.
boca wrote:The interesting thing about this situation is not necesarily 91L but that large cloud mass behind it because if shear lets up and it continues moving west or WNW it might turn north in the Western Caribbean.Why because by Sunday or trough will incompass the Eastern US and pull whatever is entering the Western Caribbean northward giving us needed rain.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests