BoB: Very Severe Cyclonic Storm SIDR

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Squarethecircle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2165
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: Fairfax, VA

Re: Bay of Bengal: Very Severe Cyclonic Storm SIDR 0709

#481 Postby Squarethecircle » Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:04 pm

Bhola was 130, actually. But still, winds don't matter, it's the fact that the storm surge will be enormous. I'm betting the JTWC will upgrade to category five by morn, but I will not know because I'm must leave soon :( . Would someone mind PMing me about it?
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5313
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: Bay of Bengal: Very Severe Cyclonic Storm SIDR 0709

#482 Postby Ptarmigan » Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:04 pm

Squarethecircle wrote:It's still a fairly moot point; the West Pacific is universally acknowledged to have more category fives. And the North Indian Ocean is one of the least active basins (if not THE least active basin) in the world.


I used a statistical software and punched in data for North Indian Ocean and preliminary results show that it is more active in La Nina years.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5313
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: Bay of Bengal: Very Severe Cyclonic Storm SIDR 0709

#483 Postby Ptarmigan » Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:05 pm

Squarethecircle wrote:Bhola was 130, actually. But still, winds don't matter, it's the fact that the storm surge will be enormous. I'm betting the JTWC will upgrade to category five by morn, but I will not know because I'm must leave soon :( . Would someone mind PMing me about it?


Hurricane Katrina showed that large storm surge can come from weakening hurricanes, in this case a monsterous one.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5313
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: Bay of Bengal: Very Severe Cyclonic Storm SIDR 0709

#484 Postby Ptarmigan » Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:06 pm

wxman57 wrote:Check out the satellite picture of the 1970 cyclone that killed 300,000-500,000 people in Bangladesh. It's in about the same area as Sidr.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1970_Bhola_cyclone


I wrote a little article about the Bhola Cyclone.

Bhola Cyclone
0 likes   

jaxfladude
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1249
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:36 pm
Location: Jacksonville, Fla

Re: Bay of Bengal: Very Severe Cyclonic Storm SIDR 0709

#485 Postby jaxfladude » Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:07 pm

PRAYERS
0 likes   

Squarethecircle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2165
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: Fairfax, VA

Re: Bay of Bengal: Very Severe Cyclonic Storm SIDR 0709

#486 Postby Squarethecircle » Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:10 pm

Ptarmigan wrote:
Squarethecircle wrote:It's still a fairly moot point; the West Pacific is universally acknowledged to have more category fives. And the North Indian Ocean is one of the least active basins (if not THE least active basin) in the world.


I used a statistical software and punched in data for North Indian Ocean and preliminary results show that it is more active in La Nina years.

What does that have to do with what I'm talking about? Though that may explain why this kind of storm formed again; during a fairly strong La Nina pattern.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5313
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: Bay of Bengal: Very Severe Cyclonic Storm SIDR 0709

#487 Postby Ptarmigan » Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:12 pm

Squarethecircle wrote:What does that have to do with what I'm talking about? Though that may explain why this kind of storm formed again; during a fairly strong La Nina pattern.


The North Indian Ocean has not been well studied, so I decided to take some time and look at what climatological factors play a role in that area. No one has done ACEs for that area and I did do that as well.
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

#488 Postby WindRunner » Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:13 pm

Looking good . . . though it does appear to be a little smushed to the north . . . glad to see there are some westerlies awaiting it, even if they are post-landfall.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

#489 Postby WindRunner » Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:20 pm

CNN finally has an article, though it's only the second story in the World section . . . http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/asiapcf/1 ... index.html

On the other hand, they do at least list it with 134mph sustained winds, according to the indescript "authorities."

EDIT: and still nothing from the rest of the U.S. media . . . :x
Last edited by WindRunner on Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: Bay of Bengal: Very Severe Cyclonic Storm SIDR 0709

#490 Postby wxman57 » Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:26 pm

I did some checking on tides in Bangladesh. Found a great web site with a tide calculation for Chittagong, near the mouth of the Ganges River:

http://www.mobilegeographics.com:81/locations/1231.html

Here's the tidal chart for the area. I figure landfall will be near 21Z tomorrow. They're exactly 12 hours ahead of CST, so that's around 3am Friday (21Z Thu). The tide chart says tides about 3 meters above MSL around that time - near high tide:

Image
Last edited by wxman57 on Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

#491 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:32 pm

I have family living in Western India near the border
to Bangladesh and I have been there many times.
Though the family members are inland from the coast I will PRAY for everyone in the
path of this storm. This is NOT good. I have been there, the buildings
are very poorly constructed sometimes just thin metal sheets and very
thin metal pieces as large walls it is NOT a good situation.
This is just horrific. What I saw there in the buildings cannot hold
up. :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#492 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:34 pm

don't you mean 3 a.m. Friday?
0 likes   

User avatar
Crostorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2060
Age: 50
Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2006 3:51 pm
Location: Croatia-Europe
Contact:

#493 Postby Crostorm » Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:34 pm

Great danger signal 10 for Mongla, 9 for Ctg as hurricane approaches: Massive evacuation ordered in coast line

http://www.bangladesh-web.com/view.php?hidRecord=177458
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

#494 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:36 pm

This storm is making me sick to my stomach
Derek or anyone is there ANY hope of significant weakening
I am very worried about family and friends in the threat area
Derek said could get 15 ft surge

most family is inland but some may be not very elevated from
the coast so if there is a surge that would be very bad.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re:

#495 Postby wxman57 » Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:37 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:don't you mean 3 a.m. Friday?


Yep, thanks, fixed it. What a scary night for those people.
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

Re: Bay of Bengal: Very Severe Cyclonic Storm SIDR 0709

#496 Postby WindRunner » Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:39 pm

Looking back, it seems like the RSMC advisory for 18z was never posted (actually, looking at it, it seems it was only transmitted two hours ago). IMD did go 100kts, FWIW at this point . . .


FKIN20 VIDP 150030

DTG : 20071114/1800Z
TCAC: NEW DELHI
TC : SIDR
NR : 12

PSN : N1630 E08900
MOV : N09KT
C : 956HPA
MAX WIND:100KT GUSTING TO 110KT

FCST PSN+12HRS: 150600 N1900 E08900
MAX WIND+12HRS:110KT
FCST PSN+18HRS: 151200 N2000 E08900
MAX WIND+18HRS:115KT
FCST PSN+24HRS: 151800 N2100 E08900
MAX WIND+24HRS: 115KT

NEXT MSG: 20071115/0000Z

TOO : 15/0500 HRS IST.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#497 Postby CrazyC83 » Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:39 pm

IMD has it strengthening right up to landfall...
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

Re:

#498 Postby MiamiensisWx » Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:40 pm

Tampa Bay Hurricane wrote:This storm is making me sick to my stomach
Derek or anyone is there ANY hope of significant weakening
I am very worried about family and friends in the threat area
Derek said could get 15 ft surge

most family is inland but some may be not very elevated from
the coast so if there is a surge that would be very bad.

The geographical region is much worse than the Gulf coast in terms of surge. Obviously, Katrina weakened from its peak; it still produced a peak surge near ~28-30 feet. Sidr must weaken to a TD or TS. You need a smaller RMW and wind field in order to reduce potential damage, so it may not help if Sidr weakens to a Category 1 TC. Hopefully, it will make landfall at low tide. The RMW should remain narrow, too. You need a smaller wind radii (>34 kt radius) in order to minimize surge and damages.
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

#499 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:42 pm

thanks miami

only thing we can do is pray
and I hope to God that some miracle stops this surge
from coming there
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#500 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:45 pm

I do not see a weakening below a cat 3. If this does weaken to a 3 as I suspect it will, the wind field likely will expand, making this potentially even worse

ANY DEVIATION TO THE WEST WILL BRING 30 FEET OF TIDAL SURGE INTO INDIA, INCLUDING UP THE RIVERS NEAR CALCUTTA
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests