Tropical Depression LORENZO: Discussions & Images
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- HURAKAN
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 46086
- Age: 38
- Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
- Location: Key West, FL
- Contact:
136
NOUS42 KNHC 241815 AMD
WEATHER RECONNAISSANCE FLIGHTS
CARCAH, NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER, MIAMI, FL.
0215 PM EDT MON 24 SEPTEMBER 2007
SUBJECT: TROPICAL CYCLONE PLAN OF THE DAY (TCPOD)
VALID 25/1100Z TO 26/1100Z SEPTEMBER 2007
TCPOD NUMBER.....07-122 AMENDMENT
I. ATLANTIC REQUIREMENTS
1. SUSPECT AREA (CARIBBEAN SEA)
FLIGHT ONE --TEAL 70 (NO CHANGE)
A. 25/1800Z
B. AFXXX 01JJA INVEST
C. 25/1630Z
D. 15.5N 63.5W
E. 25/1700Z TO 24/2200Z
F. SFC TO 10,000 FT
FLIGHT TWO --TEAL 71 (NO CHANGE)
A. 26/0600,1200Z
B. AFXXX 02JJA CYCLONE
C. 26/0500Z
D. 16.5N 65.0W
E. 26/0530Z TO 26/1200Z
F. SFC TO 10,000 FT
2. SUCCEEDING DAY OUTLOOK: CONTINUE 6-HRLY FIXES. PROBABLE
P-3 FLIGHTS DEPARTING EVERY 12 HRS BEGINNING AT 26/2000Z.
3. REMARKS: TASKING FOR THIS SYSTEM FOR 24/1800Z CANCELED BY
NHC AT 24/1300Z. ALL TASKING FOR A SUSPECT AREA IN THE GULF
OF MEXICO CANCELED AT 24/1100Z.
4. SUSPECT AREA (GULF OF MEXICO)
FLIGHT ONE --TEAL 73 (ADDED)
A. 25/1600Z
B. AFXXX 01KKA INVEST
C. 25/1345Z
D. 22.0N 94.0W
E. 25/1530Z TO 25/1930Z
F. SFC TO 10,000 FT
FLIGHT TWO --TEAL 74 (ADDED)
A. 26/0600Z
B. AFXXX 02KKA CYCLONE
C. 26/0245Z
D. 22.0N 95.0W
E. 26/0500Z TO 26/0900Z
F. SFC TO 10,000 FT
5. OUTLOOK FOR SUCCEEDING DAY: CONTINUE 12-HRLY FIXES.
II.PACIFIC REQUIREMENTS
1. NEGATIVE RECONNAISSANCE REQUIREMENTS.
2. OUTLOOK FOR SUCCEEDING DAY.....NEGATIVE.
SEF
NOUS42 KNHC 241815 AMD
WEATHER RECONNAISSANCE FLIGHTS
CARCAH, NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER, MIAMI, FL.
0215 PM EDT MON 24 SEPTEMBER 2007
SUBJECT: TROPICAL CYCLONE PLAN OF THE DAY (TCPOD)
VALID 25/1100Z TO 26/1100Z SEPTEMBER 2007
TCPOD NUMBER.....07-122 AMENDMENT
I. ATLANTIC REQUIREMENTS
1. SUSPECT AREA (CARIBBEAN SEA)
FLIGHT ONE --TEAL 70 (NO CHANGE)
A. 25/1800Z
B. AFXXX 01JJA INVEST
C. 25/1630Z
D. 15.5N 63.5W
E. 25/1700Z TO 24/2200Z
F. SFC TO 10,000 FT
FLIGHT TWO --TEAL 71 (NO CHANGE)
A. 26/0600,1200Z
B. AFXXX 02JJA CYCLONE
C. 26/0500Z
D. 16.5N 65.0W
E. 26/0530Z TO 26/1200Z
F. SFC TO 10,000 FT
2. SUCCEEDING DAY OUTLOOK: CONTINUE 6-HRLY FIXES. PROBABLE
P-3 FLIGHTS DEPARTING EVERY 12 HRS BEGINNING AT 26/2000Z.
3. REMARKS: TASKING FOR THIS SYSTEM FOR 24/1800Z CANCELED BY
NHC AT 24/1300Z. ALL TASKING FOR A SUSPECT AREA IN THE GULF
OF MEXICO CANCELED AT 24/1100Z.
4. SUSPECT AREA (GULF OF MEXICO)
FLIGHT ONE --TEAL 73 (ADDED)
A. 25/1600Z
B. AFXXX 01KKA INVEST
C. 25/1345Z
D. 22.0N 94.0W
E. 25/1530Z TO 25/1930Z
F. SFC TO 10,000 FT
FLIGHT TWO --TEAL 74 (ADDED)
A. 26/0600Z
B. AFXXX 02KKA CYCLONE
C. 26/0245Z
D. 22.0N 95.0W
E. 26/0500Z TO 26/0900Z
F. SFC TO 10,000 FT
5. OUTLOOK FOR SUCCEEDING DAY: CONTINUE 12-HRLY FIXES.
II.PACIFIC REQUIREMENTS
1. NEGATIVE RECONNAISSANCE REQUIREMENTS.
2. OUTLOOK FOR SUCCEEDING DAY.....NEGATIVE.
SEF
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2718
- Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
- Location: Beaumont, TX
- PTrackerLA
- Category 5
- Posts: 5277
- Age: 41
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
- Location: Lafayette, LA
- HURAKAN
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 46086
- Age: 38
- Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
- Location: Key West, FL
- Contact:
TWD 205:
THE GULF OF MEXICO...
A 1011 MB LOW PRESSURE CENTER IS NEAR 22N93W...ALONG A TROUGH
THAT STRETCHES FROM 19N91W OF THE YUCATAN PENINSULA TO 25N95W
IN THE WESTERN GULF WATERS. NUMEROUS STRONG SHOWERS AND
THUNDERSTORMS FROM 22N TO 24N BETWEEN 90W AND 94W...AND FROM
28N TO 29N BETWEEN 90W AND 92W. ISOLATED MODERATE SHOWERS ARE
ELSEWHERE BETWEEN 90W AND 94W.
THE GULF OF MEXICO...
A 1011 MB LOW PRESSURE CENTER IS NEAR 22N93W...ALONG A TROUGH
THAT STRETCHES FROM 19N91W OF THE YUCATAN PENINSULA TO 25N95W
IN THE WESTERN GULF WATERS. NUMEROUS STRONG SHOWERS AND
THUNDERSTORMS FROM 22N TO 24N BETWEEN 90W AND 94W...AND FROM
28N TO 29N BETWEEN 90W AND 92W. ISOLATED MODERATE SHOWERS ARE
ELSEWHERE BETWEEN 90W AND 94W.
0 likes
- Comanche
- Category 1
- Posts: 381
- Age: 53
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:33 am
- Location: Clear Lake City Texas
Re: INVEST 94L: Gulf of Mexico: Discussions & Images
Wx_Warrior wrote:It will not be a Tx/La system
Where do you see it going? and why?
0 likes
- cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 145305
- Age: 68
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: INVEST 94L: Gulf of Mexico: Discussions & Images
24/1745 UTC 22.3N 93.5W T1.5/1.5 94L -- Atlantic Ocean
Almost a TD.
Almost a TD.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2718
- Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
- Location: Beaumont, TX
- Hurricaneman
- Category 5
- Posts: 7351
- Age: 45
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
- Location: central florida
Re:
CrazyC83 wrote:If this system and 96L become TD's at the same time, this is TD12 and 96L is TD13, correct?
the one that became the invest first would be the first to get a number, so you would be right
0 likes
Re: INVEST 94L: Gulf of Mexico: Discussions & Images
cycloneye wrote:24/1745 UTC 22.3N 93.5W T1.5/1.5 94L -- Atlantic Ocean
Almost a TD.
T numbers aren't used to determine a TD. TDs aren't required to have certain sustained maximum wind speed for classification, although NHC hardly initiates advisories on TD with winds less than 30mph. What we need is a closed surface circulation and organized convection near the center.
Last edited by Thunder44 on Mon Sep 24, 2007 1:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Re: INVEST 94L: Gulf of Mexico: Discussions & Images
JB's going bonkers this afternoon that Miami isn't sending out a recon. He's forcasting "much wailing and knashing of teeth" with 94L before all is said and done.
0 likes
-
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 190
- Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 7:21 am
- Location: Johnson Bayou, LA
- Contact:
Re: INVEST 94L: Gulf of Mexico: Discussions & Images
Thunder44 wrote:cycloneye wrote:24/1745 UTC 22.3N 93.5W T1.5/1.5 94L -- Atlantic Ocean
Almost a TD.
T numbers aren't used to determine a TD. TDs aren't required to have certain sustained maximum wind speed for classification, although NHC hardly initiates advisories on TD with winds less than 30mph. What we need is a closed surface circulation and organized convection near the center.
And we don't have that now?????
0 likes
Re: INVEST 94L: Gulf of Mexico: Discussions & Images
Kludge wrote:JB's going bonkers this afternoon that Miami isn't sending out a recon. He's forcasting "much wailing and knashing of teeth" with 94L before all is said and done.
It's funny that NHC waited until almost noon yesterday to cancel recon. But today decided to cancel it early in the morning. They are probably going to have hard time getting plane out there between now and tomorrow, since the flight crew probably stayed home.
0 likes
Re: INVEST 94L: Gulf of Mexico: Discussions & Images
bbadon wrote:Thunder44 wrote:cycloneye wrote:24/1745 UTC 22.3N 93.5W T1.5/1.5 94L -- Atlantic Ocean
Almost a TD.
T numbers aren't used to determine a TD. TDs aren't required to have certain sustained maximum wind speed for classification, although NHC hardly initiates advisories on TD with winds less than 30mph. What we need is a closed surface circulation and organized convection near the center.
And we don't have that now?????
I think you miss the point of my post. I do think it is now a TD, despite the T-numbers.
0 likes
-
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 190
- Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 7:21 am
- Location: Johnson Bayou, LA
- Contact:
Re: INVEST 94L: Gulf of Mexico: Discussions & Images
[
T numbers aren't used to determine a TD. TDs aren't required to have certain sustained maximum wind speed for classification, although NHC hardly initiates advisories on TD with winds less than 30mph. What we need is a closed surface circulation and organized convection near the center.[/quote]
And we don't have that now?????[/quote]
I think you miss the point of my post. I do think it is now a TD, despite the T-numbers.[/quote]
O yes missed the point and I agree.
T numbers aren't used to determine a TD. TDs aren't required to have certain sustained maximum wind speed for classification, although NHC hardly initiates advisories on TD with winds less than 30mph. What we need is a closed surface circulation and organized convection near the center.[/quote]
And we don't have that now?????[/quote]
I think you miss the point of my post. I do think it is now a TD, despite the T-numbers.[/quote]
O yes missed the point and I agree.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests