Tropical Depression TEN: Discussions & Images
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- gatorcane
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 23691
- Age: 47
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
- Location: Boca Raton, FL
Latest IR SAT frame shows intense storms (reds showing up) but more activity seems to be brewing farther east of the peninsula than the models are showing it right now.....
anybody think the "center" may actually form more offshore SE Florida giving it time to develop before moving onshore?
Here is the loop:
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/watl/loop-avn.html
anybody think the "center" may actually form more offshore SE Florida giving it time to develop before moving onshore?
Here is the loop:
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/watl/loop-avn.html
Last edited by gatorcane on Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Re: INVEST 93L (ATL): Discussion & Images
just walked dog to beach before i go back to work, the seas and winds are up a good deal from mid morning. probably gusting to 30 in s. palm beach county with sustained around 20-23 IMO
and wow the ULL looks like it's signature improved 10x since this morning to the west of tampa, unless this thing is flying west i don't see how the shear around it would not create anything but a subtropical type storm
is the ULL development pushing the convergance/ precip shield east off florida and is the low level circulation still intact
and wow the ULL looks like it's signature improved 10x since this morning to the west of tampa, unless this thing is flying west i don't see how the shear around it would not create anything but a subtropical type storm
is the ULL development pushing the convergance/ precip shield east off florida and is the low level circulation still intact
Last edited by cpdaman on Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
Re: Re:
skysummit wrote:Derek Ortt wrote:SHIPS has almost no shear at this time tomorrow.
The UL likely is not going to have the influence on shearing this that I thought yesterday (isn't as sheared as I thought it would be currently even)
Derek, why is the SHIPS showing such low shear as early as tomorrow? Is it figuring the ULL moving away quicker than we're currently thinking?
The SHIPS is picking up on the fact the sfc low will be in close proximity to the upper low...at least that is how I read it. I think it is a bit of a red-herring. Zero shear in this case doesn't mean ideal conditions...since it will be near the center of the upper low. Look at the forecast upper level charts. The sfc low moves close to where the upper low itis...so SHIPS sees low shear...it's not under low shear in the middle of antic-cyclonic flow...its under low shear in the middle of cyclonic flow. Thats a big difference.
0 likes
- DESTRUCTION5
- Category 5
- Posts: 4423
- Age: 43
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
- Location: Stuart, FL
Re: INVEST 93L (ATL): Discussion & Images
Brent wrote:Can someone get SSD to put a floater on this?
Where is Dixie when you need her..LOL
0 likes
Re: INVEST 93L (ATL): Discussion & Images
is vivian brown from TWC a meteorologist or just an on air personality
she keeps saying it is an upper level feature and they are waiting on a possible low level circulation to form
then i read the 205 marine statement talking about a strengthening low near bimini
geez what gives
she keeps saying it is an upper level feature and they are waiting on a possible low level circulation to form
then i read the 205 marine statement talking about a strengthening low near bimini
geez what gives
Last edited by cpdaman on Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
- Tropical Wave
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 7:06 am
Re: Re:
Air Force Met wrote:skysummit wrote:Derek Ortt wrote:SHIPS has almost no shear at this time tomorrow.
The UL likely is not going to have the influence on shearing this that I thought yesterday (isn't as sheared as I thought it would be currently even)
Derek, why is the SHIPS showing such low shear as early as tomorrow? Is it figuring the ULL moving away quicker than we're currently thinking?
The SHIPS is picking up on the fact the sfc low will be in close proximity to the upper low...at least that is how I read it. I think it is a bit of a red-herring. Zero shear in this case doesn't mean ideal conditions...since it will be near the center of the upper low. Look at the forecast upper level charts. The sfc low moves close to where the upper low itis...so SHIPS sees low shear...it's not under low shear in the middle of antic-cyclonic flow...its under low shear in the middle of cyclonic flow. Thats a big difference.
What is SHIPS?
0 likes
Re: INVEST 93L (ATL): Discussion & Images
however, SHIPS keeps the system under low shear until landfall. 200mb divergence/convergence is only accounting for a -2KT change in the model
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/gfstc2.c ... =Animation
GFS goes fully anti-cyclonic in 48 hours
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/gfstc2.c ... =Animation
GFS goes fully anti-cyclonic in 48 hours
Last edited by Derek Ortt on Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 38088
- Age: 36
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
- Contact:
Re: INVEST 93L (ATL): Discussion & Images
cpdaman wrote:is vivian brown from TWC a meteorologst or just an on air personality
she keeps saying it is an upper level feature and they are waiting on a possible low level circulation to form
then i read the 205 marine statement talking about a strengthening low near bimini
geez what gives
LOL... I admit I just saw it too. I don't rely on them for primary info anymore because of just this situation.

0 likes
- wzrgirl1
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1325
- Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 6:44 am
- Location: Pembroke Pines, Florida
Re: INVEST 93L (ATL): Discussion & Images
Derek,
Do you expect this to be named before it crosses south florida?
Do you expect this to be named before it crosses south florida?
0 likes
- TreasureIslandFLGal
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1581
- Age: 57
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 6:16 pm
- Location: Clearwater, Florida ~3 miles from the coast now. We finally moved safely off the barrier island!
Re: INVEST 93L (ATL): Discussion & Images
When this thing does cross the state, it is expected to rapidly pass over and head west, correct? --or is there a possibility that this will be a slow-mover and, even worse, potentially stall in the gulf? right now I'm hoping for nothing but a little much needed rain from Jerry. We have company coming into town tomorrow and staying through the weekend. Please tell me that there is no chance of this getting off the west coast and then really cranking up...without moving west quickly...causing our weather here to be a mess and having to evacuate!? (we are on a barrier island)
0 likes
Re: INVEST 93L (ATL): Discussion & Images
Plents of West winds, at one buoy sustained running 30 mps and 40 in gusts. Pressured dropping quite a bit How long til classified?
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2004 1:19 pm
- Location: Rochester, NY
Re: Re:
What is SHIPS?[/quote]Taken from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tropical_c ... tion_model
"tropical cyclone forecast model is a computer program that uses meteorological data to forecast the motion and intensity of tropical cyclones. Such models utilize powerful supercomputers with sophisticated mathematical modeling software and meteorological data to calculate paths and intensities. There are two general types, statistical and dynamical, and two primary types of forecasts, track and intensity."
SHIPS (Statistical Hurricane Intensity Prediction Scheme) is a statistical model that uses climatological, persistence and synoptic predictors.
"tropical cyclone forecast model is a computer program that uses meteorological data to forecast the motion and intensity of tropical cyclones. Such models utilize powerful supercomputers with sophisticated mathematical modeling software and meteorological data to calculate paths and intensities. There are two general types, statistical and dynamical, and two primary types of forecasts, track and intensity."
SHIPS (Statistical Hurricane Intensity Prediction Scheme) is a statistical model that uses climatological, persistence and synoptic predictors.
Last edited by tracyswfla on Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6684
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: Re:
DESTRUCTION5 wrote:gatorcane wrote:To me if you look at those models and the current SAT image it reminds me alot of Frances -- although Frances was much stronger..
wow here we go again.
latest:
LMAO ..Yea that looks exactly like frances...maybe whn she left Africa!
I'm shocked that anyone is comparing this to Frances or any other "organized" named system right now. It not even close to that.
0 likes
Re: INVEST 93L (ATL): Discussion & Images
Remember Humberto went from nothing to 85 mph in a matter of hours..not that it's going to happen in this instance,but....it does seem to be developing fast!
0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
Re: INVEST 93L (ATL): Discussion & Images
Brent wrote:gatorcane wrote:Yes, that is why I think the NHC may consider tropical storm warnings for parts of Florida tonight.
Just my opinion.
Another thing to consider is the possibility of tornado watches/warnings with all the vorticity in the atmosphere....
If they put TS warnings up then it has to be at least a TD first. They don't put them up for invests only. It's certainly possible... could see another "surprise" storm.
Like I said last night...once the low closes off and deepens just a little...we should have a TS no problem just due to gradient conditions ALONE. There is a steep gradient in place already and just a little lower pressure is all that is needed to create some TS force winds on the north side...albeit 60-100 miles from the center.
Also...not sure why so many of you are acting surprised. What is happening now off the east coast of FL is by no means a shocker. The synoptic setup was almost perfect...and keeping that in mind...it isn't going to get on a runaway train like Humberto did. It will follow the synoptics and deepen to a certain extent (while off of Florida)...its not going to pull a Katrina or Humberto right now...so everyone can remain calm.

0 likes
- gatorcane
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 23691
- Age: 47
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
- Location: Boca Raton, FL
Re: Re:
Stormcenter wrote:DESTRUCTION5 wrote:gatorcane wrote:To me if you look at those models and the current SAT image it reminds me alot of Frances -- although Frances was much stronger..
wow here we go again.
latest:
LMAO ..Yea that looks exactly like frances...maybe whn she left Africa!
I'm shocked that anyone is comparing this to Frances or any other "organized" named system right now. It not even close to that.
no the point was that it is the size of Frances, not as strong obviously but the size of it is similar.
0 likes
Re: INVEST 93L (ATL): Discussion & Images
Updated recon...
NOUS42 KNHC 182000 AMD
WEATHER RECONNAISSANCE FLIGHTS
CARCAH, NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER, MIAMI, FL.
0400 PM EDT TUE 18 SEPTEMBER 2007
SUBJECT: TROPICAL CYCLONE PLAN OF THE DAY (TCPOD)
VALID 19/1100Z TO 20/1100Z SEPTEMBER 2007
TCPOD NUMBER.....07-116 AMENDMENT
I. ATLANTIC REQUIREMENTS
1. SUSPECT AREA (CHANGED)
FLIGHT ONE (ADDED)
A. 20/0000Z
B. NOAA9 01XXA SYNOPTIC
C. 19/1730Z
D. N/A
E. N/A
F. 41,000 TO 45,000 FT
2. SUCCEEDING DAY OUTLOOK: PROBABLE LOW LEVEL INVEST
NEAR 25.5N 88.0W AT 20/1800Z. ANOTHER G-IV MISSION
FOR 21/0000Z (ADDED)
II.PACIFIC REQUIREMENTS
1. NEGATIVE RECONNAISSANCE REQUIREMENTS.
2. OUTLOOK FOR SUCCEEDING DAY.....NEGATIVE.
SEF
NOUS42 KNHC 182000 AMD
WEATHER RECONNAISSANCE FLIGHTS
CARCAH, NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER, MIAMI, FL.
0400 PM EDT TUE 18 SEPTEMBER 2007
SUBJECT: TROPICAL CYCLONE PLAN OF THE DAY (TCPOD)
VALID 19/1100Z TO 20/1100Z SEPTEMBER 2007
TCPOD NUMBER.....07-116 AMENDMENT
I. ATLANTIC REQUIREMENTS
1. SUSPECT AREA (CHANGED)
FLIGHT ONE (ADDED)
A. 20/0000Z
B. NOAA9 01XXA SYNOPTIC
C. 19/1730Z
D. N/A
E. N/A
F. 41,000 TO 45,000 FT
2. SUCCEEDING DAY OUTLOOK: PROBABLE LOW LEVEL INVEST
NEAR 25.5N 88.0W AT 20/1800Z. ANOTHER G-IV MISSION
FOR 21/0000Z (ADDED)
II.PACIFIC REQUIREMENTS
1. NEGATIVE RECONNAISSANCE REQUIREMENTS.
2. OUTLOOK FOR SUCCEEDING DAY.....NEGATIVE.
SEF
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests