TD INGRID: Discussions & Images - Last Advisory

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6305
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

Re: Invest 91L in Central Atlantic: Discussions & Images

#221 Postby LarryWx » Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:36 am

MWatkins wrote:I think Larry's point has been misread.

His point, I think, is that no system moving at 315 before 48W has ever hit the US...not the other way around.

So...if this wave is moving at 315 degrees before it passes 48W...it's going to turn away before hitting the US.
MW


Thanks Mike for clarifying the point I was trying to make. Perfectly said.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: Invest 91L in Central Atlantic: Discussions & Images

#222 Postby wxman57 » Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:37 am

Let me check to see the 00Z EC. It shows a trof axis extending down to 91L beginning Wednesday. Ridge way to the northwest. Certainly not the same setup as with Felix or Dean. Trof to the north, not a ridge. By Friday, EC has the ridge building back to the south and east over 91L a little bit, but not a strong ridge. It would only take a movement toward 288 degrees from the current location to track north of the Caribbean. That may not be too difficult with a trof to the north if the EC is right.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: Invest 91L in Central Atlantic: Discussions & Images

#223 Postby wxman57 » Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:37 am

LarryWx wrote:
MWatkins wrote:I think Larry's point has been misread.

His point, I think, is that no system moving at 315 before 48W has ever hit the US...not the other way around.

So...if this wave is moving at 315 degrees before it passes 48W...it's going to turn away before hitting the US.
MW


Thanks Mike for clarifying the point I was trying to make. Perfectly said.


Sorry, Larry, I misunderstood what you were saying.
0 likes   

LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6305
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

Re: Invest 91L in Central Atlantic: Discussions & Images

#224 Postby LarryWx » Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:42 am

MWatkins wrote:It is hard to see what the globals are up to here...
The big question...back to Larry's post...is can it get to 50W without heading NW in the process?
MW


That's pretty much my take. Will the GFDL just be plain wrong?

Also, all readers should keep in mind that this "rule" of moving NW prior to reaching 48 W applies only once it becomes a tropical cyclone. Where it tracks as just an invest doesn't matter as far as this rule is concerned.
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

#225 Postby x-y-no » Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:43 am

I'm with Mike and Derek here ... I don't understand what the globals are seeing, unless they've got it too far north.

I don't believe either the stall or the NW movement.
0 likes   

LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6305
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

Re: Invest 91L in Central Atlantic: Discussions & Images

#226 Postby LarryWx » Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:44 am

wxman57 wrote:
LarryWx wrote:
MWatkins wrote:I think Larry's point has been misread.

His point, I think, is that no system moving at 315 before 48W has ever hit the US...not the other way around.

So...if this wave is moving at 315 degrees before it passes 48W...it's going to turn away before hitting the US.
MW


Thanks Mike for clarifying the point I was trying to make. Perfectly said.


Sorry, Larry, I misunderstood what you were saying.


No problem. Perhaps I didn't word it too well being that several posters misunderstood.
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re: Invest 91L in Central Atlantic: Discussions & Images

#227 Postby x-y-no » Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:45 am

LarryWx wrote:
MWatkins wrote:It is hard to see what the globals are up to here...
The big question...back to Larry's post...is can it get to 50W without heading NW in the process?
MW


That's pretty much my take. Will the GFDL just be plain wrong?

Also, all readers should keep in mind that this "rule" of moving NW prior to reaching 48 W applies only once it becomes a tropical cyclone. Where it tracks as just an invest doesn't matter as far as this rule is concerned.


The GFDL has been just plain wrong a lot more than usual this year. I don't know what they did to the code, but they ought to un-do it.
0 likes   

User avatar
Lowpressure
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2032
Age: 58
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 9:17 am
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina

Re: Invest 91L in Central Atlantic: Discussions & Images

#228 Postby Lowpressure » Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:45 am

I would be interested in Cycloneyes' take on this. NWS PR should be really watching this system, maybe with some solid insight.
0 likes   

curtadams
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1122
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: Orange, California
Contact:

#229 Postby curtadams » Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:46 am

The globals are confused because they're being asked to imagine a cyclone that's not there. It's just a big strong low. Naturally they're going to be off predicting movement. As Sanibel pointed out, this is reminiscent of Felix and Dean where you had a big strong low chug west for some time before forming into a cyclone. BAMS is the model for the next day at the very least.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#230 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:48 am

Latest:

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
storms in NC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2338
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Wallace,NC 40 miles NE of Wilm
Contact:

#231 Postby storms in NC » Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:48 am

This is what Wilm had to say about the front coming in and stalling.

HIGH PRESSURE OFFSHORE WILL RIDGE INTO THE AREA THROUGH TUESDAY. A
COLD FRONT WILL ENTER THE EASTERN CAROLINAS LATE TUESDAY NIGHT AND
STALL NEAR THE COAST ON WEDNESDAY. THE FRONT WILL REMAIN IN THE
AREA WHILE SLOWLY WEAKENING THROUGH SATURDAY. A STRONGER COLD
FRONT WILL ADVANCE QUICKLY SOUTH AND EAST FROM THE GREAT LAKES
SATURDAY AND BRING THE POTENTIAL FOR COOLER WEATHER EARLY NEXT
WEEK.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: Invest 91L in Central Atlantic: Discussions & Images

#232 Postby KWT » Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:51 am

wxman57 wrote:Let me check to see the 00Z EC. It shows a trof axis extending down to 91L beginning Wednesday. Ridge way to the northwest. Certainly not the same setup as with Felix or Dean. Trof to the north, not a ridge. By Friday, EC has the ridge building back to the south and east over 91L a little bit, but not a strong ridge. It would only take a movement toward 288 degrees from the current location to track north of the Caribbean. That may not be too difficult with a trof to the north if the EC is right.


Yeah I believe the other models show the same thing and thats the reason why the GFS keeps the system on a pretty much due west movement till 24-30hrs time. As you say the Atlantic set-up is different right now and there are more weaknesses in the high, right now two main ones appear to me, one around 45-50W and another between 70-80W, thesre two locations will be where 91L will take a more WNW/NW type direction.
I shoud note tohugh I'm not talking about a GFDL track, but maybe just enough to skirt the northern Leeward Islands and by that time I think we'll be looking at a strong tropical storm, maybe a minimal hurricane IF it forms.

At least this system has an active ITCZ to work with as well, plenty of instablity is present in that location, at least compared to what we saw when Felix came across.
Last edited by KWT on Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Fego
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 767
Age: 65
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 7:58 pm
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Contact:

Re: Invest 91L in Central Atlantic: Discussions & Images

#233 Postby Fego » Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:52 am

Since this morning I have this doubt about the low being near 11 N, may be 11.5N... may be the Pro's can stablish a location. :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
Typhoon_Willie
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1042
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 3:19 pm
Location: Greenacres City, Florida

Re: Invest 91L in Central Atlantic: Discussions & Images

#234 Postby Typhoon_Willie » Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:53 am

Just back from eyeballing the visible loop and it looks to me like if it is moving now at all it is moving very slowly. Now I could be wrong with this observation but it does look like it is moving slowly to the west if at all.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#235 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:57 am

Latest:

Image
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: Invest 91L in Central Atlantic: Discussions & Images

#236 Postby Sanibel » Mon Sep 10, 2007 11:00 am

It's moving but the ridge is more lax with this one. My eye wants to say an Antilles track. I wonder what role the weaker ridge will play in forcing development? Track will depend on where the center forms in that broad circulation. I guess we can assume further north in a lax scenario.

Wait 24 hours.
0 likes   

User avatar
punkyg
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 770
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: sanford florida

#237 Postby punkyg » Mon Sep 10, 2007 11:13 am

I still wanna know what will 91L do to the convection in front of it.
will 91L absorbed it or not?

oh and is 91L moving and if it is how fast?


Hi gusty! :cheesy:
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: Invest 91L in Central Atlantic: Discussions & Images

#238 Postby Sanibel » Mon Sep 10, 2007 11:14 am

:uarrow: Yes, it will overtake it and draw it in or displace it either way.

NHC says moving west 10-15mph
0 likes   

User avatar
storms in NC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2338
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Wallace,NC 40 miles NE of Wilm
Contact:

Re: Invest 91L in Central Atlantic: Discussions & Images

#239 Postby storms in NC » Mon Sep 10, 2007 11:21 am

Sanibel wrote::uarrow: Yes, it will overtake it and draw it in or displace it either way.

NHC says moving west 10-15mph


That is a nice pace really 10-15
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: Invest 91L in Central Atlantic: Discussions & Images

#240 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Mon Sep 10, 2007 11:22 am

Sanibel wrote:It's moving but the ridge is more lax with this one. My eye wants to say an Antilles track. I wonder what role the weaker ridge will play in forcing development? Track will depend on where the center forms in that broad circulation. I guess we can assume further north in a lax scenario.

Wait 24 hours.


Lesser Antilles or Greater Antilles?
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests