Invest 99L:Off E Coast-Discussions

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: 99L: Off SE Coast-Discussions-11:30 AM TWO at page 81

#1661 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:43 am

weatherwoman wrote:my hats off to JB and the crew at Accuweather!


They didn't do anything out of the normal. If you have to salute anyone you should also salute the NHC that was supporting development since the first time. Most pro-Mets and amateurs, like me, in the forum supported development based on the forecasted prognosis and always reminded the "dead posters" that a vigorous LLC was still very much present and that conditions were going to become more favorable. It was not time to just throw the towel. We should learn from this, not necessarily "eat crow."

When (IN)Accuwx gets something that had not been mentioned by the NHC or anyone else, then you should spend your time saluting them.
0 likes   

chadtm80

Re:

#1662 Postby chadtm80 » Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:43 am

Bane wrote:2.0 is usually enough for classification, isn't it?

They wont classify bases on that output.. Especially since they are going to be in the system with in hours to check it out for themselves anyway.. However it does support the fact that the system is "starting" to get its act together
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38089
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: Invest 99L: Off SE Coast-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#1663 Postby Brent » Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:44 am

I think recon will find Gabrielle. Seriously. It's hard to believe looking at it that last night it looked very close to not being an invest any longer, and now this.

But Luis is right, they will not upgrade til recon gets there. It's only a few hours anyway...
0 likes   

User avatar
Bane
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 690
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 3:06 pm
Location: Ogden, NC
Contact:

Re: Re:

#1664 Postby Bane » Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:48 am

chadtm80 wrote:
Bane wrote:2.0 is usually enough for classification, isn't it?

They wont classify bases on that output.. Especially since they are going to be in the system with in hours to check it out for themselves anyway.. However it does support the fact that the system is "starting" to get its act together


yep, i know they'll wait for recon. just wanted to make sure that under normal conditions, would this be enough to upgrade a system, say if it was between africa and the islands?
0 likes   

seahawkjd
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 632
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 4:12 pm
Location: Morehead City, NC
Contact:

Re: Invest 99L: Off SE Coast-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#1665 Postby seahawkjd » Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:48 am

Well, since the boards are more active I'll ask one more time. Is the actual low still on the edge of the convection or under it now? Thanks
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: Invest 99L: Off SE Coast-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#1666 Postby tolakram » Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:51 am

tolakram wrote:http://hadar.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis/online/trop_ge_storm_relative_0.html

Turn off all images except 279-282.

Really impressive! That's less than an hour.



Quoting myself n case people missed it. Sorry if I'm being overly newbish but in those 4 frames you can see the storms starting to wrap around. It's the most impressive view I've seen of any storm. :clap:


http://hadar.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... ive_0.html
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

Re: Re:

#1667 Postby Chacor » Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:51 am

Bane wrote:
chadtm80 wrote:
Bane wrote:2.0 is usually enough for classification, isn't it?

They wont classify bases on that output.. Especially since they are going to be in the system with in hours to check it out for themselves anyway.. However it does support the fact that the system is "starting" to get its act together


yep, i know they'll wait for recon. just wanted to make sure that under normal conditions, would this be enough to upgrade a system, say if it was between africa and the islands?


Not with just one set of numbers. Probably they would if TAFB was also at T1.5 or T2.0, and it met the criteria for a tropical cyclone.
0 likes   

User avatar
storms in NC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2338
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Wallace,NC 40 miles NE of Wilm
Contact:

#1668 Postby storms in NC » Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:52 am

When do you think warnings will go up. Sat?
0 likes   

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

Re: Invest 99L: Off SE Coast-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#1669 Postby Frank2 » Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:52 am

I was looking about 20 minutes ago - hard to say, but, it if there is a true LLC center, it looks to be just southwest of the convection that is on the east side of the system...

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-vis.html
Last edited by Frank2 on Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:53 am, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

PhillyWX
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 494
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 8:54 am
Location: Philly
Contact:

Re: Invest 99L: Off SE Coast-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#1670 Postby PhillyWX » Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:52 am

seahawkjd wrote:Well, since the boards are more active I'll ask one more time. Is the actual low still on the edge of the convection or under it now? Thanks


http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t3/vis-l.jpg

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/float3.html

Convection is wrapping around the low but the low itself is not yet under the convection.
0 likes   

User avatar
Buck
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1173
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Invest 99L: Off SE Coast-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#1671 Postby Buck » Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:54 am

Brent wrote:I think recon will find Gabrielle. Seriously. It's hard to believe looking at it that last night it looked very close to not being an invest any longer, and now this.

But Luis is right, they will not upgrade til recon gets there. It's only a few hours anyway...


I concur completely.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145310
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Invest 99L: Off SE Coast-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#1672 Postby cycloneye » Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:54 am

HURAKAN,post those good images that you bring every half an hour. :)
0 likes   

chadtm80

Re: Invest 99L: Off SE Coast-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#1673 Postby chadtm80 » Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:54 am

tolakram wrote:
tolakram wrote:http://hadar.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis/online/trop_ge_storm_relative_0.html

Turn off all images except 279-282.

Really impressive! That's less than an hour.



Quoting myself n case people missed it. Sorry if I'm being overly newbish but in those 4 frames you can see the storms starting to wrap around. It's the most impressive view I've seen of any storm. :clap:


http://hadar.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... ive_0.html

Thanks tolakram.. Looks good and this will actually help to answer the question above your post about where the LLC is compared to the convection..

Run this loop.. http://hadar.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... ive_0.html
put checks in box 277, 278, 286,287,288 and run the loop.. You will see the convection on NE side but starting to cycle into middle of circulation
0 likes   

User avatar
carversteve
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 161
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 7:40 am

Re: Invest 99L: Off SE Coast-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#1674 Postby carversteve » Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:55 am

Yes it is really looking good..it may jump right to a ts...and it did not take it long to get this healthy...thats why i asked the ? way back...what would keep this thing from blowing up..except for maybe a landfall..no expert..just curious
0 likes   

seahawkjd
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 632
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 4:12 pm
Location: Morehead City, NC
Contact:

Re: Invest 99L: Off SE Coast-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#1675 Postby seahawkjd » Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:55 am

Yeah I was just about to say that. Thanks, the loop is impressive and clearly shows where the low pressure is.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: Invest 99L: Off SE Coast-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#1676 Postby Sanibel » Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:56 am

LLC relocated under eastern main convection center.
0 likes   

User avatar
BUD
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 719
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:01 am
Location: N.M.B :SC

Re: Invest 99L: Off SE Coast-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#1677 Postby BUD » Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:56 am

How fast is it moving??and where to the N,S,W,ect just got up and have no idea whats going on.
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: Invest 99L: Off SE Coast-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#1678 Postby tolakram » Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:57 am

The checks go to the omit images, so just the opposite. That confused me to while I was trying to figure it out. :) Oh, and slow it way down.
0 likes   

seahawkjd
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 632
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 4:12 pm
Location: Morehead City, NC
Contact:

Re: Invest 99L: Off SE Coast-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#1679 Postby seahawkjd » Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:58 am

Ok as soon as I thought I had it now I'm confused. Is it the swirl from the loop thats right on the edge or is it under the eastern storms like Sanibel just said?
0 likes   

chadtm80

Re: Invest 99L: Off SE Coast-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#1680 Postby chadtm80 » Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:58 am

tolakram wrote:The checks go to the omit images, so just the opposite. That confused me to while I was trying to figure it out. :) Oh, and slow it way down.

yes I took that into consideration in my post
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests