Hurricane FELIX: Caribbean-Discussions

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
miamicanes177
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1131
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:53 pm

Re: TD SIX: Near Windwards-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#121 Postby miamicanes177 » Fri Aug 31, 2007 9:53 pm

jhamps10 wrote:Wow, looking at the satellite loop, I see totally NO reason AT ALL why this should not be felix right now. in fact t numbers of 2.5, most times we will see an upgrade at 1.5 or even 2.0, There is NO excuse in my book right now.
Especially as it is threatening land at the moment. The NHC is out of line for not upgrading this.
0 likes   

User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:

Re: TD SIX: Near Windwards-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#122 Postby skysummit » Fri Aug 31, 2007 9:54 pm

Maybe they just want to issue a special statement in another hour or two....you know, just to keep things interesting.
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

#123 Postby ConvergenceZone » Fri Aug 31, 2007 9:54 pm

Wow, looks like they are only expecting a cat 1 out of this. I"m a bit shocked on their strength forecast, but they must know something we don't....
0 likes   

User avatar
Beam
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 292
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 2:06 pm

#124 Postby Beam » Fri Aug 31, 2007 9:54 pm

No big deal, I'm sure it'll be Felix soon enough.
0 likes   

Coredesat

Re: TD SIX: Near Windwards-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#125 Postby Coredesat » Fri Aug 31, 2007 9:57 pm

miamicanes177 wrote:Especially as it is threatening land at the moment. The NHC is out of line for not upgrading this.


There is no convective banding. There is no data supporting TS winds at the moment, and surface obs and recon trump Dvorak in this area, and the NHC does not upgrade solely due to proximity to land - this invites complacency and is bad forecasting. You absolutely cannot tell the NHC how to do its job; if they have data that supports a TS classification, they will upgrade. If they don't, they won't. You (or I) have no authority to tell the NHC whether it is in line or not.

Besides, there are watches/warnings out, and if there's data then they can upgrade at an intermediate or special advisory.
0 likes   

miamicanes177
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1131
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:53 pm

Re: TD SIX: Near Windwards-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#126 Postby miamicanes177 » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:02 pm

Coredesat wrote:There is no convective banding. There is no data supporting TS winds at the moment, and surface obs and recon trump Dvorak in this area. You absolutely cannot tell the NHC how to do its job; if they have data that supports a TS classification, they will upgrade. If they don't, they won't. You (or I) have no authority to tell the NHC whether it is in line or not.

Besides, there are watches/warnings out, and if there's data then they can upgrade at an intermediate or special advisory.

T2.5/2.5...plus 33mph sustained winds at Barbados that is well away from the center containing the strongest winds. Also, recon found 42kts at flight level which is very near TS strength, and that was many hours ago. Sat appearance has improved dramatically since and we have enough evidence to support a TS Felix.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: TD SIX: Near Windwards-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#127 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:03 pm

Still waiting for the discussion to see Beven's reasoning...
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: TD SIX: Near Windwards-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#128 Postby RL3AO » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:03 pm

miamicanes177 wrote:T2.5/2.5...plus 33mph sustained winds at Barbados that is well away from the center containing the strongest winds. Also, recon found 42kts at flight level which is very near TS strength, and that was many hours ago. Sat appearance has improved dramatically since and we have enough evidence to support a TS Felix.


What are the other two T#s?
Last edited by RL3AO on Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Category 5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10074
Age: 35
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:00 pm
Location: New Brunswick, NJ
Contact:

Re: TD SIX: Near Windwards-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#129 Postby Category 5 » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:03 pm

miamicanes177 wrote:
jhamps10 wrote:Wow, looking at the satellite loop, I see totally NO reason AT ALL why this should not be felix right now. in fact t numbers of 2.5, most times we will see an upgrade at 1.5 or even 2.0, There is NO excuse in my book right now.
Especially as it is threatening land at the moment. The NHC is out of line for not upgrading this.


Mind backing that up with some scientific evidence?
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38088
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: TD SIX: Near Windwards-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#130 Postby Brent » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:05 pm

REPORTS FROM AN AIR FORCE RESERVE HURRICANE HUNTER...MICROWAVE
SATELLITE IMAGERY...AND DATA FROM FRENCH RADAR ON MARTINIQUE
SUGGEST THAT TROPICAL DEPRESSION SIX HAS AN ELONGATED LOW-LEVEL
CIRCULATION...WITH THE CENTER FIXES FROM THE HURRICANE HUNTER IN
THE NORTHERN PART OF THE ELONGATION. THE AIRCRAFT REPORTED A
CENTRAL PRESSURE OF 1008 MB AND MAXIMUM FLIGHT-LEVEL WINDS OF 42 KT
EAST OF THE CENTER. THIS DATA ALONG WITH QUIKSCAT DATA AND
SUBSEQUENT SATELLITE INTENSITY ESTIMATES SHOW THAT THE DEPRESSION
IS JUST BELOW TROPICAL STORM STRENGTH...AND IT COULD BECOME A
TROPICAL STORM AT ANY TIME AS IT MOVES THROUGH THE WINDWARD
ISLANDS.


Does it really make a difference? 35 vs. 40 mph? No.
0 likes   

Coredesat

Re: TD SIX: Near Windwards-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#131 Postby Coredesat » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:06 pm

miamicanes177 wrote:T2.5/2.5...plus 33mph sustained winds at Barbados that is well away from the center containing the strongest winds. Also, recon found 42kts at flight level which is very near TS strength, and that was many hours ago. Sat appearance has improved dramatically since and we have enough evidence to support a TS Felix.


That was far to the E of the ctr fix, read the discussion. And a 33mph sustained wind well away from the center and not under any convection is not going to support and upgrade either.

Didn't I say Dvorak is trumped in this area?
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#132 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:08 pm

for the record, I also called this TD 6 not TS 6... so Dr. Beven is not the only met who didn't feel an upgrade was warranted at this time
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

Re:

#133 Postby senorpepr » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:09 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:Felix will be a September storm unless the post-analysis confirms differently than the operational analysis.

Felix was going to be a September storm regardless. Even if it was upgraded at 8pm (01 Sept/00Z), it would be a September storm.

The meteorology community uses the zulu clock. It's our friend.
0 likes   

miamicanes177
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1131
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:53 pm

Re: TD SIX: Near Windwards-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#134 Postby miamicanes177 » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:10 pm

Coredesat wrote:Didn't I say Dvorak is trumped in this area?

Unless you've managed get your own private pilot to fly you up into this thing tonight to get data, I'm not sure how the 2.5 estimate could be overtaken. Recon is not flying in this right now and it looks 10x better since they were up there many hours ago.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#135 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:10 pm

it will be an August storm (unless protocol has changed) as the time when the system becomes a TD is when it is assigned a particular month
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: TD SIX: Near Windwards-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#136 Postby RL3AO » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:10 pm

Everybody STOP! And read why we have a tropical depression, instead of a storm instead of just saying the NHC are cowards

REPORTS FROM AN AIR FORCE RESERVE HURRICANE HUNTER...MICROWAVE
SATELLITE IMAGERY...AND DATA FROM FRENCH RADAR ON MARTINIQUE
SUGGEST THAT TROPICAL DEPRESSION SIX HAS AN ELONGATED LOW-LEVEL
CIRCULATION...WITH THE CENTER FIXES FROM THE HURRICANE HUNTER IN
THE NORTHERN PART OF THE ELONGATION. THE AIRCRAFT REPORTED A
CENTRAL PRESSURE OF 1008 MB AND MAXIMUM FLIGHT-LEVEL WINDS OF 42 KT
EAST OF THE CENTER. THIS DATA ALONG WITH QUIKSCAT DATA AND
SUBSEQUENT SATELLITE INTENSITY ESTIMATES SHOW THAT THE DEPRESSION
IS JUST BELOW TROPICAL STORM STRENGTH...AND IT COULD BECOME A
TROPICAL STORM AT ANY TIME AS IT MOVES THROUGH THE WINDWARD
ISLANDS.

FORECASTER BEVEN
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

#137 Postby ConvergenceZone » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:11 pm

The good news is that this isn't forecast to be a major like Dean was...in fact, not even remotely close to being a major, based on the latest forecast. Hopefully it will miss any real populated areas like Dean did as well....
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#138 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:13 pm

the NHC forecast does not have this becoming a major, but they leave the possibility open.

NHC does tend to be a little more conservative on the initial forecasts than I do. That said, there is likely greater than a 70 percent chance of this beocming a major
0 likes   

User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:

Re:

#139 Postby skysummit » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:13 pm

ConvergenceZone wrote:The good news is that this isn't forecast to be a major like Dean was...in fact, not even remotely close to being a major, based on the latest forecast. Hopefully it will miss any real populated areas like Dean did as well....


THE LARGE-SCALE MODELS FORECAST THE CYCLONE TO BE IN DEEP-LAYER
EASTERLY FLOW ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF AN UPPER-LEVEL ANTICYCLONE FOR
THE NEXT 5 DAYS...WHICH SHOULD ALLOW SIGNIFICANT STRENGTHENING ONCE
THE SYSTEM CONSOLIDATES
. THE SHIPS MODEL AND THE EXPERIMENTAL LGEM
MODEL BOTH FORECAST A MAJOR HURRICANE IN ABOUT 5 DAYS. ON THE
OTHER HAND...AS NOTED ABOVE THE HWRF DISSIPATES THE SYSTEM...WHILE
THE GFDL WAITS UNTIL IT IS WEST OF 75W TO FORECAST SIGNIFICANT
STRENGTHENING. GIVEN THE GOOD OUTFLOW ALOFT AND THE FORECAST
UPPER-LEVEL WINDS...THE INTENSITY FORECAST CALLS FOR STEADY
STRENGTHENING THROUGH THE FORECAST PERIOD. THERE IS A CHANCE THAT
THE CYCLONE COULD BE STRONGER THAN CURRENTLY FORECAST IF THE
STATISTICAL MODELS ARE CORRECT.
0 likes   

Coredesat

Re: TD SIX: Near Windwards-Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#140 Postby Coredesat » Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:14 pm

miamicanes177 wrote:
Coredesat wrote:Didn't I say Dvorak is trumped in this area?

Unless you've managed get your own private pilot to fly you up into this thing tonight to get data, I'm not sure how the 2.5 estimate could be overtaken. Recon is not flying in this right now and it looks 10x better since they were up there many hours ago.


Dvorak is trumped. Just look at Dean: based on Dvorak estimates it would not have been a Cat 5. The highest T associated with it was T6.5/6.5.
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests