Texas Winter Weather Thread #3 - GFS showing cold christmas

Winter Weather Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
double D
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 485
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 8:17 pm
Location: Austin, Tx

#441 Postby double D » Mon Dec 18, 2006 5:42 pm

Extremeweatherguy wrote:
Portastorm wrote:EWG ... I wouldn't get too wrapped up in the 18z GFS run if I were you ... I'd trust it as much as I would trust news from the Al Jazeera network.
yeah, I don't trust it really that much at all, it is just interesting to point out that this now makes 8 consistant GFS runs in a row showing a similar situation. The slower movement may also be a hint at what could be coming in the 0z run. I guess we will have to see. Really it is just interesting to look at right now since we are talking about a situation that is now less than a week out.


Does anybody else notice that the GFS does not bring down a 1040+ high anymore? It only shows a 1036mb high coming down and weaking it to 1032mb. The 2 meter temps are also a little warmer as well. This might be a situation where we get snow and never reach the 32 degree mark.
0 likes   

rsdoug1981
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 184
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:22 pm
Location: Canton, MS

#442 Postby rsdoug1981 » Mon Dec 18, 2006 5:50 pm

It will all depend on the critical thickness values. Watch for that magical 540 line. Surface freezing temps don't matter for snow to fall...just for snow to stick.
0 likes   

User avatar
Janie2006
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1329
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 3:28 pm
Location: coastal Ms aka home of the hurricanes

#443 Postby Janie2006 » Mon Dec 18, 2006 6:28 pm

I don't blame NWS for playing it safe at the moment. Really, why should they go out on the proverbial limb at this distance? Colder temperatures are a fairly safe bet. A frozen precip event is a trickier kind of creature, especially along the coast.
0 likes   

double D
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 485
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 8:17 pm
Location: Austin, Tx

#444 Postby double D » Mon Dec 18, 2006 6:33 pm

Janie2006 wrote:I don't blame NWS for playing it safe at the moment. Really, why should they go out on the proverbial limb at this distance? Colder temperatures are a fairly safe bet. A frozen precip event is a trickier kind of creature, especially along the coast.


Especially since it involves Christmas weekend. This is probably the worst situation a forecaster could be in. On one hand they don't want to cause a panic and jump the gun and nothing happens and on the other they don't want to sit back and do nothing until the last minute. It will sure be interesting on how they approach this weekend (assuming that the current model solutions hold).
0 likes   

User avatar
Janie2006
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1329
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 3:28 pm
Location: coastal Ms aka home of the hurricanes

#445 Postby Janie2006 » Mon Dec 18, 2006 6:42 pm

Good point, double D. I sure don't envy those gals and guys.
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

#446 Postby southerngale » Mon Dec 18, 2006 6:43 pm

Let's not be greedy though. Would 31 inches of snow be enough? ;)

31 Inches of Snow in SE Texas in 24 Hrs. Yep, it Can Happen!

http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic ... ght=inches
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#447 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Mon Dec 18, 2006 6:47 pm

southerngale wrote:Let's not be greedy though. Would 31 inches of snow be enough? ;)

31 Inches of Snow in SE Texas in 24 Hrs. Yep, it Can Happen!

http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic ... ght=inches
Yes, I think 31" would be just perfect. :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#448 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Mon Dec 18, 2006 6:54 pm

whether or not this actually plays out, this is still a very cool forecast to see posted for the Austin area for Christmas Eve:

AUSTIN:
Sunday: A 20 percent chance of rain. Mostly cloudy, with a high near 44.

Sunday Night: A chance of snow or rain. Mostly cloudy, with a low around 31. Chance of precipitation is 30%.


Also, Houston has updated their forecast for the Christmas period since earlier:

(north) HOUSTON:
Sunday: A 30 percent chance of rain. Partly cloudy, with a high near 53.

Sunday Night: A 20 percent chance of rain. Partly cloudy, with a low around 35.

Christmas Day: Partly cloudy, with a high near 53.


It does look a bit colder for Sunday night.
0 likes   

Burn1
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:13 pm

#449 Postby Burn1 » Mon Dec 18, 2006 7:02 pm

Houston Xmas weekend outlook.....


Sat
Dec 23 Mostly Cloudy
64°/45° 10%
9 Comfortable

Sun
Dec 24 Showers
56°/41° 40%
5 Moderate



Mon Dec 25 Mostly Cloudy
55°/43° 10%
7 Moderate



Tue
Dec 26 Sunny
55°/40° 10%
8 Comfortable



Wed
Dec 27 Sunny
62°/43°
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#450 Postby Air Force Met » Mon Dec 18, 2006 7:03 pm

rsdoug1981 wrote:It will all depend on the critical thickness values. Watch for that magical 540 line. Surface freezing temps don't matter for snow to fall...just for snow to stick.


OK...guess it's that time now...to start chiming in on this...

Ihave to disagree with you here. The "magical 540 line" has absolutely NOTHING to do with whether you will get snow or not....neither do ANY thickness values. This is something we discussed last year and I am seeing some make the same mistake again this year.

Thickness values are just that...THICKNESS of an air layer. If you have a really deep 500mb low and a decent high at the sfc...you will have thickness values below 540. However, if your sfc temps are above freezing...and if that freezing layer is greater than 1500 feet thick or if there is another layer aloft that is above freezing...it really doesn't matter what your thickness values are. You could have 534 thickness values and if you have above freezing sfc temps or a warm layer aloft that is greater than 1000'-1500' thick...you will get a cold rain, freezing rain or sleet.

Thickness values are a first look ONLY. When you see the thickness values getting lower...that is your first clue to start looking elsewhere. Most mets...once they see the thickness values getting close...realize that the atmosphere may be getting cold enough for winter precip...then they won't look at thickness again...except at a glance. They look at temps...AND the availability of moisture.

In this case...the 12z run shows (if the 12Z GFS was GOSPEL...which it isn't) it is above freezing over SETX from the sfc to 2000'. There is also a warm layer (above freezing) between 3000' and 8000' on Christmas eve morning at 12Z.

On the morning of the 25th, there is still a warm later aloft...down to 1500' thick and it is still above freezing at the sfc...which is probably wrong since there is no moisture at all and radiational cooling will set in somewhat.

By 18Z...the thickness values are about 534...and the warm slot is still there at 4000'...and temps are above freezing.

The chances for any winter type precip in SETX look very slim...not because of the lack of cold air...but moisture. This is a typical cold shot for us...which has cold/dry air with it.

One more thing to add about the 540 line. The 540 line is only and indication for snow in the plains. IN the Rockies...the value is closer to 552. It changes depending on where you are. IN the Pacific NW...the values you look for are closer to 530...or lower. So remember...it is just a tool to give you a heads up...once you get your heads up...move away from it and start looking at the actual temps in the air column...because THAT is what will determine snow/sleet/freezing rain or just plain old rain....not the 540 line.
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

#451 Postby southerngale » Mon Dec 18, 2006 7:14 pm

It sure is good to see you here, AFM! Thanks for your input. Now if you could just change that "look very slim" comment to something more encouraging, I'd appreciate it. ;)
0 likes   

User avatar
cctxhurricanewatcher
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1206
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:53 pm
Location: Corpus Christi, Texas

#452 Postby cctxhurricanewatcher » Mon Dec 18, 2006 8:01 pm

Image
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38089
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#453 Postby Brent » Mon Dec 18, 2006 8:32 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
rsdoug1981 wrote:It will all depend on the critical thickness values. Watch for that magical 540 line. Surface freezing temps don't matter for snow to fall...just for snow to stick.


OK...guess it's that time now...to start chiming in on this...

Ihave to disagree with you here. The "magical 540 line" has absolutely NOTHING to do with whether you will get snow or not....neither do ANY thickness values. This is something we discussed last year and I am seeing some make the same mistake again this year.

Thickness values are just that...THICKNESS of an air layer. If you have a really deep 500mb low and a decent high at the sfc...you will have thickness values below 540. However, if your sfc temps are above freezing...and if that freezing layer is greater than 1500 feet thick or if there is another layer aloft that is above freezing...it really doesn't matter what your thickness values are. You could have 534 thickness values and if you have above freezing sfc temps or a warm layer aloft that is greater than 1000'-1500' thick...you will get a cold rain, freezing rain or sleet.

Thickness values are a first look ONLY. When you see the thickness values getting lower...that is your first clue to start looking elsewhere. Most mets...once they see the thickness values getting close...realize that the atmosphere may be getting cold enough for winter precip...then they won't look at thickness again...except at a glance. They look at temps...AND the availability of moisture.

In this case...the 12z run shows (if the 12Z GFS was GOSPEL...which it isn't) it is above freezing over SETX from the sfc to 2000'. There is also a warm layer (above freezing) between 3000' and 8000' on Christmas eve morning at 12Z.

On the morning of the 25th, there is still a warm later aloft...down to 1500' thick and it is still above freezing at the sfc...which is probably wrong since there is no moisture at all and radiational cooling will set in somewhat.

By 18Z...the thickness values are about 534...and the warm slot is still there at 4000'...and temps are above freezing.

The chances for any winter type precip in SETX look very slim...not because of the lack of cold air...but moisture. This is a typical cold shot for us...which has cold/dry air with it.

One more thing to add about the 540 line. The 540 line is only and indication for snow in the plains. IN the Rockies...the value is closer to 552. It changes depending on where you are. IN the Pacific NW...the values you look for are closer to 530...or lower. So remember...it is just a tool to give you a heads up...once you get your heads up...move away from it and start looking at the actual temps in the air column...because THAT is what will determine snow/sleet/freezing rain or just plain old rain....not the 540 line.


Ah. The unpopular voice of reason. 8-)
0 likes   
#neversummer

User avatar
weatherrabbit_tx
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 270
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 3:13 pm
Location: Kingwood,Tx
Contact:

#454 Postby weatherrabbit_tx » Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:13 pm

so basically the snow sandwich has to be right up in the atmosphere or layers in order to get snow? so any warm layer aloft you get ice? I think someone explained if before :think:
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#455 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:13 pm

JB's evening post is saying that he expects 2-3 snow events to reach deep into TX over the next 2 weeks or so. He also said that these will not be just west TX or panhandle events only, but that each one may reach all the way to I-35 and possibly beyond.

If he is right, then it could be an interesting end to December and start to January for sure!!! I just hope that northern Harris county can get something out of this pattern!
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

#456 Postby Portastorm » Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:17 pm

Extremeweatherguy wrote:JB's evening post is saying that he expects 2-3 snow events to reach deep into TX over the next 2 weeks or so. He also said that these will not be just west TX or panhandle events only, but that each one may reach all the way to I-35 and possibly beyond.

If he is right, then it could be an interesting end to December and start to January for sure!!! I just hope that northern Harris county can get something out of this pattern!


You WILL get something EWG ... a nice chilly rain. Heh, heh ... :hehe:
0 likes   

User avatar
cctxhurricanewatcher
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1206
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:53 pm
Location: Corpus Christi, Texas

#457 Postby cctxhurricanewatcher » Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:24 pm

Portastorm wrote:
Extremeweatherguy wrote:JB's evening post is saying that he expects 2-3 snow events to reach deep into TX over the next 2 weeks or so. He also said that these will not be just west TX or panhandle events only, but that each one may reach all the way to I-35 and possibly beyond.

If he is right, then it could be an interesting end to December and start to January for sure!!! I just hope that northern Harris county can get something out of this pattern!


You WILL get something EWG ... a nice chilly rain. Heh, heh ... :hehe:


Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#458 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:42 pm

Portastorm wrote:
Extremeweatherguy wrote:JB's evening post is saying that he expects 2-3 snow events to reach deep into TX over the next 2 weeks or so. He also said that these will not be just west TX or panhandle events only, but that each one may reach all the way to I-35 and possibly beyond.

If he is right, then it could be an interesting end to December and start to January for sure!!! I just hope that northern Harris county can get something out of this pattern!


You WILL get something EWG ... a nice chilly rain. Heh, heh ... :hehe:
Funny... :roll:

:lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

#459 Postby Portastorm » Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:47 pm

OK then ... let me offer you something that will cheer ya up ... the 12z run of the Euro.

Day 6:
http://weather.cod.edu/forecast/ECMWF/e ... mp_144.gif

Day 7:
http://weather.cod.edu/forecast/ECMWF/e ... mp_168.gif

Looks nice and cold ... and somewhat wet/icy!
0 likes   

aggiecutter
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1753
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 9:22 pm
Location: Texarkana

#460 Postby aggiecutter » Mon Dec 18, 2006 10:06 pm

JB must be looking at the noon Ensembles because the trough position depicted is classic for Texas winter storms.

Noon Ensembles:
http://wwwt.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/gmb/ens/t ... 121812.htm

Checkout the 850mb temperature anomalies. The area and deviation below normal is very impressive. This is a winter storm or storms waiting to happen.

http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/map/images/ens/ ... times.html
0 likes   


Return to “Winter Weather”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests