Can TS's go backwards?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
- Category 2
- Posts: 671
- Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:37 pm
- Location: Spring Hill Fl.
Can TS's go backwards?
Here is an all together different question. On occasion tornadoes develop with an anticyclonic spin in the northern hemisphere. Has a tropical system ever done this?
0 likes
I've never heard of it happening in either hemisphere, at least as far as a tropical cyclone is concerned. If it does start to happen, we'd all be in big trouble, because it would mean something has gone very wrong with the Earth's rotation...
Frank
Frank
Last edited by Frank2 on Mon Sep 04, 2006 9:07 am, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes
-
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2004 9:22 am
The only time I can think of was with Cyclone Agni.
Read more on that here (original discussion on the storm) and here (why, as a developing cyclone that originated in the northern hemisphere, it crossed the equator into the southern hemisphere but still kept spinning counterclockwise).
Read more on that here (original discussion on the storm) and here (why, as a developing cyclone that originated in the northern hemisphere, it crossed the equator into the southern hemisphere but still kept spinning counterclockwise).
0 likes
mtm4319 wrote:The only time I can think of was with Cyclone Agni.
Read more on that here (original discussion on the storm) and here (why, as a developing cyclone that originated in the northern hemisphere, it crossed the equator into the southern hemisphere but still kept spinning counterclockwise).
I asked a question a long time ago about "has a tropical cyclone ever spun the wrong way?" and I got "NO". Thank you for the information! That is really neat.
0 likes
gilbert88 wrote:Don't mean to be nitpicky, but that map shows Cyclone Agni dissipating before crossing the Equator.
Advisory 1 is where it was first considered a named storm. It went WNW toward the African coast before dissipating ("14A"). It crossed over the equator and back in its formative stage, before Advisory 1.
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 1243
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 9:45 am
- Location: Ft. Collins, CO
A circulation, cyclonic or anticyclonic, cannot survive a trip across the equator. Coriolis works because areas at higher latitudes have higher linear speeds to "keep up" with the equatorial regions. As such, coriolis effect is dependent directly on latitude, and its value is 0 at the equator. With no coriolis, air moves linearly instead of converging to or diverging from a circulation center, and any circulation that may have existed will weaken if it gets too close to the equator and be nonexistent at the equator. This will *usually* be the case, but it does assume only coriolis dictates air flow at the equator.
0 likes
- Hurricanehink
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 2041
- Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2003 2:05 pm
- Location: New Jersey
ncweatherwizard wrote:A circulation, cyclonic or anticyclonic, cannot survive a trip across the equator. Coriolis works because areas at higher latitudes have higher linear speeds to "keep up" with the equatorial regions. As such, coriolis effect is dependent directly on latitude, and its value is 0 at the equator. With no coriolis, air moves linearly instead of converging to or diverging from a circulation center, and any circulation that may have existed will weaken if it gets too close to the equator and be nonexistent at the equator. This will *usually* be the case, but it does assume only coriolis dictates air flow at the equator.
Wouldn't Agni negate this?
0 likes
tgenius wrote:Has there ever been a case where a storm has moved south over FL? I had a dream last night that a storm was coming in through JAX and coming down the state... is that even possible? lol
Absolutely. Betsy (1965) moved from north to south and hit Key Largo. It had almost two complete loops in its track before then.
Katrina entered the east coast north of Miami and went southwest to exit the southwest corner of the peninsula. I can't think of a track exactly from Jacksonville to Naples, say, but it's not impossible exactly.
0 likes
- Hurricanehink
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 2041
- Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2003 2:05 pm
- Location: New Jersey
tgenius wrote:Has there ever been a case where a storm has moved south over FL? I had a dream last night that a storm was coming in through JAX and coming down the state... is that even possible? lol
Actually, yes. A hurricane moved across the state in 1906, looped, and hit the state again from the north near Jacksonville.

0 likes
Scott,
A storm can cross the equator theoretically
Absolute vorticity is relative plus planetary. The planetary would work against it, but if a monsoon circulation was intense enough, it would probably be able to support an equatorial cross
Agni basically has 0 help from the Earth when it spun up, all from the monsoon circ
A storm can cross the equator theoretically
Absolute vorticity is relative plus planetary. The planetary would work against it, but if a monsoon circulation was intense enough, it would probably be able to support an equatorial cross
Agni basically has 0 help from the Earth when it spun up, all from the monsoon circ
0 likes
ncweatherwizard wrote:Coriolis works because areas at higher latitudes have higher linear speeds to "keep up" with the equatorial regions.
It's true that the Coriolis torque is zero at the equator, but this speed statement is not. Toward the poles, parallels of latitude, being closer to the axis of rotation, are shorter, yet they rotate around once a day, just like the equator. The "linear speed" is obviously fastest at the equator.
What this does is to give equatorial parcels of air the greatest "planetary" angular momentum; parcels toward the poles have less. And it's the change of this planetary angular momentum with latitude that's related to the Coriolis torque. No change just at the equator means no Coriolis torque at the equator. The fastest change with latitude is at the poles, where the torque is greatest. You can use this reasoning and geometry to work out for yourself that it's proportional to the sine of the latitude. HPH
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ulf and 43 guests