clfenwi wrote:gatorcane wrote:interesting the shallow BAMS take it west but the global models see a weakness...
early to say where it will go
Shallow BAM isn't on the SFWMD graphic (that has become harder to read since they've added the extra models) for whatever reason. It takes the system to the north on a track between that of the LBAR and GFDL. That's why I was saying that the BAMs were 'inverted, because they are doing the opposite of the rule of stronger/north weaker/west rule of thumb.
As for BensonTCwatcher's comment regarding the GFDL... it didn't really do that well with Ernesto. Check out the model performance page for Ernesto to see. At most time periods it was the weakest link of the GFDL, UKMET, NOGAPS, AVN (GFS) consensus... at the later periods it underperformed CLIPER.
It's entertaining to look back on the first full set of plots for the invest that became Ernesto. Turned out that LBAR(?!) had it best, with the Shallow BAM being competitive. Other than that though, none of them were better off than CLIPER.
OK I'll concede to the overall performance on the CLIPER, but the GFDL had Ernesto crossing Cuba and it also did very well as it exited FL ( as did the GFS) Particularly when the dropsonde data was added to the GFS. I did not do any comparison on overall or early cycle.