Forecasting Chris - Most Difficult Storm in a Long Time

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
jhamps10

#21 Postby jhamps10 » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:09 pm

Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:I seen the tutt catching Chris more then 6 to 12 hours before it happen. Heck I seen it a little longer. I can read a map.


what is the tutt?
0 likes   

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

#22 Postby Frank2 » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:10 pm

Well, watching the WV loop this morning, I was very impressed - it was as if someone knocked off Chris's beanie (not an official term, I know) - it's been a long time since I've seen a system weaken that rapidly and completely.

Frank
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#23 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:12 pm

The models never had a good catch on this system in the first place...It had everything to do with where it was and where the tutt was...Chris moved to slowly so the tutt got it. The nhc should of seen a 800 to 1200 mile wide tutt move its way...In seen that shear value where increasing over the cyclone at least 6 hours away. Also 6 hours before it decoupled shear was already flating the top side. Once they knew the tutt had got it it was a pretty easly forecast overall...
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23693
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#24 Postby gatorcane » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:12 pm

Frank2 wrote:Well, watching the WV loop this morning, I was very impressed - it was as if someone knocked off Chris's beanie - it's been a long time since I've seen a system weaken that rapidly and completely.

Frank


I honestly could not believe it either. I am still floored. Makes you wonder if he will pull another rapid strenghthening on us... :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
Grease Monkey
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 727
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 9:25 pm

#25 Postby Grease Monkey » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:13 pm

Anything is possible.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23693
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#26 Postby gatorcane » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:15 pm

Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:The models never had a good catch on this system in the first place...It had everything to do with where it was and where the tutt was...Chris moved to slowly so the tutt got it. The nhc should of seen a 800 to 1200 mile wide tutt move its way...In seen that shear value where increasing over the cyclone at least 6 hours away. Also 6 hours before it decoupled shear was already flating the top side. Once they knew the tutt had got it it was a pretty easly forecast overall...


This TUTT has been phenomenal this year. It has single-handedly shield the US from anything originating out in the Atlantic. But it is showing signs of weakening, hence Chris.

It's only a matter of time that it will not be strong enough to shield us - typically around this time and through the next couple of weeks it begins to move out.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8346
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

#27 Postby SouthFloridawx » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:15 pm

Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:I seen the tutt catching Chris more then 6 to 12 hours before it happen. Heck I seen it a little longer. I can read a map.


Perhaps you want to shar with us the location of the TUTT because I never heard it in any of the discussions from the hurricane center or my local news. Perhaps you can go into a little more depth and show us what a TUTT looks like.
0 likes   

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

#28 Postby Frank2 » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:15 pm

As Derek just said on another thread - the shear to it's east is moving westward faster than Chris, so...

Frank
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#29 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:16 pm

Matt,

This TUTT interaction was not as easy as you make it out to be. That's a real cheap shot at NHC, IMO
0 likes   

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5907
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

#30 Postby MGC » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:18 pm

I was never very bullish on this system. I'm actually surprised Chris got as strong as he did. But, I've seen these things come back from the dead, so until the circulation completely opens I'm going to keep watching.....MGC
0 likes   

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#31 Postby JonathanBelles » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:18 pm

what is TuTT?
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23693
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#32 Postby gatorcane » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:18 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:Matt,

This TUTT interaction was not as easy as you make it out to be. That's a real cheap shot at NHC, IMO


One would think it was more complicated than what you are saying Matt, I agree with Derek - the NHC has some extremely smart people.....
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#33 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:20 pm

Derek on the shear maps shear was moving up at 10 knots 6 to 12 hours over the system...So the tutt was moving westward. Also 6 to 12 hours before the decoupling the outflow over the north and northeast side was getting flated. I knew that shear was increasing over the cyclone. Cheap shot I think not.
0 likes   

Stormavoider
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 671
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:37 pm
Location: Spring Hill Fl.

#34 Postby Stormavoider » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:23 pm

Frank2 wrote:As Derek just said on another thread - the shear to it's east is moving westward faster than Chris, so...

Frank


Derek, At what level is this shear? Would a upper level shear have a lesser impact on this already stripped low level system? It seems what stripped it last night must have been mid-level.
0 likes   

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

#35 Postby Frank2 » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:23 pm

Well, better to err on the side of weakening than strengthening...
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#36 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:25 pm

the upper level shear will prevent any deep convection from sustaining itself around the core
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Gulf of Gavin Newsom

#37 Postby Steve » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:25 pm

Tropical Upper Tropospheric Trough (but you can wikipedia it). What it is, is a broad swath of lower pressure that looks like a script "V" that sweeps down from the horse climates into the tropics. It causes shear on storms moving toward it, but it is most often found as a prevalent feature in El Nino years.

Look at the V shaped item around 67West.

http://weather.msfc.nasa.gov/GOES/goeseasthurrwv.html

>>The models never had a good catch on this system in the first place

Sure they did. They were on their game to begin with. NOGAPS is the only one that maintains the circulation ultimately arching it down to the Mexican Coast. The UK Met moves the wave energy toward the Upper Texas coastline. The others varyingly keep something minor moving across the central Gulf of Mexico.

As far as this being a hard storm to forecast, I also disagree on that. The NHC has been on their game offering the caveats that several of the globals want to dissipate the circulation. They, IMHO, were better than expected (particularly the globals). Now what happens between now and next week is anyone's guess.

JMO of course.

Steve
Last edited by Steve on Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Rieyeuxs
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 189
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Birmingham, AL

#38 Postby Rieyeuxs » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:26 pm

For all of those of you who were asking, I Wiki'd it:

A Tropical Upper Tropospheric Trough (TUTT) A TUTT low is a TUTT that has completely cut-off. TUTT lows are more commonly known in the Western Hemisphere as an "upper cold low". TUTTs are different from mid-latitude troughs in that they are maintained by subsidence warming near the tropopause which balances radiational cooling. TUTTs are important for tropical cyclone forecasting as they can force large amounts of harmful vertical wind shear over tropical disturbances and tropical cyclones. There are also suggestions that TUTTs can assist tropical cyclone genesis and intensification by providing additional forced ascent near the storm center and/or by allowing for an efficient outflow channel in the upper troposphere.
0 likes   

User avatar
Rieyeuxs
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 189
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Birmingham, AL

#39 Postby Rieyeuxs » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:26 pm

Steve beat me to it. So close... :cry:
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Gulf of Gavin Newsom

#40 Postby Steve » Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:29 pm

Nah, you did fine. They are an interesting weather phenomina. I agree with the writeup, but it really depends on the relational positioning between the cyclone and the TUTT as to whether or not it's harmful or beneficial to a system (much like a standard Upper Level Low).

Steve
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], ouragans, SconnieCane and 46 guests