Wave in Central Caribbean Thread #2

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

Wave in Central Caribbean Thread #2

#1 Postby WindRunner » Sun Jul 30, 2006 8:45 pm

Thread #1:

http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=87223&start=480

Image

Right now it's looking rather disorganized, but still pretty convective. Let's see what it can do down the line as it heads westward.
0 likes   

max

#2 Postby max » Sun Jul 30, 2006 8:47 pm

Does not look like much but then again I can't let my guard down with mother nature. Hurricane Wilma, Rita, and Katrina tough me that.

The three sisters.
0 likes   

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#3 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Sun Jul 30, 2006 8:49 pm

Wilma, Katrina, and Rita were on a whole different level than this wave will ever be. IMO the 2005 season is in a class of its own.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

max

#4 Postby max » Sun Jul 30, 2006 8:50 pm

HurricaneHunter914 wrote:Wilma, Katrina, and Rita were on a whole different level than this wave will ever be. IMO the 2005 season is in a class of its own.


Your so right with that! I will remember the 2005 hurricane season forever! It will be in my mind before I even die I bet.
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#5 Postby HouTXmetro » Sun Jul 30, 2006 9:56 pm

:boared:
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#6 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Sun Jul 30, 2006 9:59 pm

I'm bored to I think 94E and the cape verde wave should be the ones to watch.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38117
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#7 Postby Brent » Sun Jul 30, 2006 10:02 pm

HouTXmetro wrote::boared:


Me too.

:sleeping:
0 likes   
#neversummer

User avatar
Cyclenall
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6667
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

#8 Postby Cyclenall » Sun Jul 30, 2006 10:42 pm

HouTXmetro wrote::boared:

:boared: X30
0 likes   

max

#9 Postby max » Sun Jul 30, 2006 10:52 pm

I am so bored I wish I could go back in time or somehow have saved Hurricane Wilma radar second by second and rewatch her develop so quickly.
0 likes   

wayoutfront

#10 Postby wayoutfront » Sun Jul 30, 2006 11:45 pm

max wrote:
HurricaneHunter914 wrote:Wilma, Katrina, and Rita were on a whole different level than this wave will ever be. IMO the 2005 season is in a class of its own.


Your so right with that! I will remember the 2005 hurricane season forever! It will be in my mind before I even die I bet.


really?

LOL I remember Katrina was "the little TD 10 that could" that every one wrote off due to the SAL then Shear and dryair

she was pitiful looking http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3933 ... 00/Ten.jpg
Last edited by wayoutfront on Mon Jul 31, 2006 12:18 am, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

max

#11 Postby max » Sun Jul 30, 2006 11:48 pm

wayoutfront wrote:
max wrote:
HurricaneHunter914 wrote:Wilma, Katrina, and Rita were on a whole different level than this wave will ever be. IMO the 2005 season is in a class of its own.


Your so right with that! I will remember the 2005 hurricane season forever! It will be in my mind before I even die I bet.


really?

LOL I remember Katrina was "the little TD 10 that could" that every one wrote off due to the SAL then Shear and dryair

she was a pitiful looking WAVE



Yes really because I went through Hurricane Katrina. I didn't stay but we had 2 feet of water in the house and feel like I was lucky because our friend had 9 feet of water in her house. It was horrible her house. I feel very lucky even though we still flooded some.

If the other side of the 17 street canal would of broke we would of had 9 feet as well I am sure.

We were very lucky.
0 likes   

User avatar
LAwxrgal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1763
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:05 pm
Location: Reserve, LA (30 mi west of NOLA)

#12 Postby LAwxrgal » Sun Jul 30, 2006 11:50 pm

wayoutfront wrote:
max wrote:
HurricaneHunter914 wrote:Wilma, Katrina, and Rita were on a whole different level than this wave will ever be. IMO the 2005 season is in a class of its own.


Your so right with that! I will remember the 2005 hurricane season forever! It will be in my mind before I even die I bet.


really?

LOL I remember Katrina was "the little TD 10 that could" that every one wrote off due to the SAL then Shear and dryair

she was a pitiful looking WAVE


I thought Katrina formed from TD12?
0 likes   
Andrew 92/Isidore & Lili 02/Bill 03/Katrina & Rita 05/Gustav & Ike 08/Isaac 12 (flooded my house)/Harvey 17/Barry 19/Cristobal 20/Claudette 21/Ida 21 (In the Eye)/Francine 24
Wake me up when November ends

wayoutfront

#13 Postby wayoutfront » Sun Jul 30, 2006 11:51 pm

well technically yes and no...It was renamed.

Its still somewhat debateable
0 likes   

max

#14 Postby max » Sun Jul 30, 2006 11:52 pm

Another reason I feel so lucky is because if Hurricane Katrina would of directly hit New Orleans we would of had water up to three stories high in a whole lot of places.

The whole city of N.O. and many other parts of Louisiana would of flooded.

The only thing you would of been able to see is the top of the tall building in New Orleans and some of the Super Dome.

It would look like the scene in A.I. with New York totally under water literally.


That is one hurricane that would top Hurricane Katrina whenever it ever happens. :(

The only way it can is it has to hit New Orleans directly as a Cat. 5




So most of New Orleans and many other areas in Louisiana would have 24 feet of water covering full two story and three story houses completely plus the first three floors of tall buildings.
0 likes   

User avatar
Grease Monkey
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 727
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 9:25 pm

#15 Postby Grease Monkey » Sun Jul 30, 2006 11:57 pm

Actually a direct hit of the strong side of a CAT 4 cane would be enough to top Katrina.
0 likes   

User avatar
TSmith274
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 756
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 1:11 am
Location: New Orleans, La.

#16 Postby TSmith274 » Sun Jul 30, 2006 11:59 pm

max wrote:Another reason I feel so lucky is because if Hurricane Katrina would of directly hit New Orleans we would of had water up to three stories high in a whole lot of places.

The whole city of N.O. and many other parts of Louisiana would of flooded.

The only thing you would of been able to see is the top of the tall building in New Orleans and some of the Super Dome.

It would look like the scene in A.I. with New York totally under water literally.


That is one hurricane that would top Hurricane Katrina whenever it ever happens. :(

The only way it can is it has to hit New Orleans directly as a Cat. 5




So most of New Orleans and many other areas in Louisiana would have 24 feet of water covering full two story and three story houses completely plus the first three floors of tall buildings.


Not so sure about that. There are maps that predict water depths of a cat 5 hit. Your predictions are off-base.
0 likes   

max

#17 Postby max » Mon Jul 31, 2006 12:00 am

Grease Monkey wrote:Actually a direct hit of the strong side of a CAT 4 cane would be enough to top Katrina.


Really ? :eek:

Wow now your scaring me even more ? Would the water still be 24 feet high in a lot of areas of southeast LA. with a Cat. 4 direct hit rather than a Cat. 5 ?
0 likes   

User avatar
Grease Monkey
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 727
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 9:25 pm

#18 Postby Grease Monkey » Mon Jul 31, 2006 12:11 am

I don't how high the surge would be, but from what I understand is New orleans was hit by the weak side of Katrina as a CAT4, so it would only make sense to me that a direct hit from the strong side of a CAT4 would be worse then Katrina.
0 likes   

max

#19 Postby max » Mon Jul 31, 2006 12:31 am

Grease Monkey wrote:I don't how high the surge would be, but from what I understand is New orleans was hit by the weak side of Katrina as a CAT4, so it would only make sense to me that a direct hit from the strong side of a CAT4 would be worse then Katrina.


Yep.

Basically what we got is the least of the worst case if that even seems like much.

Its hard to believe that was the least worst case because even that is horrible but it makes you wonder how horrible it can get ? :eek:
0 likes   

Stormavoider
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 671
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:37 pm
Location: Spring Hill Fl.

#20 Postby Stormavoider » Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:07 am

The area north of the western end of Hispaniola is looking good this morning. The TWD seems to indicate its upper level. I think we should watch it. Go back 30 frames on high zoom.

http://weather.msfc.nasa.gov/GOES/goeseastconusir.html
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Argcane, Cpv17, cycloneye, Stormybajan and 39 guests