98L invest,W.GOM,Comments,Sat Pics,Models Thread

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#441 Postby HouTXmetro » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:19 pm

stormtruth wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:compared to the threat Daniel ACTUALLY poses to the USA, this is but a waste of time. A sheared TD or a weak TS is going to be given a whole 5 minutes by me, much like Grace/Jimena in 2003


Allison was a big waste of time too :roll:


I was about to say the same thing.
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6132
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

#442 Postby cheezyWXguy » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:20 pm

stormtruth wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:compared to the threat Daniel ACTUALLY poses to the USA, this is but a waste of time. A sheared TD or a weak TS is going to be given a whole 5 minutes by me, much like Grace/Jimena in 2003


Allison was a big waste of time too :roll:


allison? as in the costliest TS in U.S. History?
Ya, 5 Billion dollar TS's are a waste :roll:
0 likes   

User avatar
Swimdude
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2270
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:57 am
Location: Houston, TX

#443 Postby Swimdude » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:20 pm

I think we're all spoiled after the train of cat 5's last year. :lol:
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#444 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:21 pm

please reread my entire post

I said Allison 1989
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#445 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:22 pm

What I'm saying is that I think a LLC(Under the ULL)right on the coastline...Which the nhc is talking about. But there may be one around 24/97 to under the MLC and the deepest convection area....In which if a cyclone where to develop would try to fire there.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6685
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#446 Postby Stormcenter » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:22 pm

Swimdude wrote:I think we're all spoiled after the train of cat 5's last year. :lol:


Correct.

No tropical system is a "waste" time of if it has the potential to cause death and destruction.
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6132
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

#447 Postby cheezyWXguy » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:23 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:please reread my entire post

I said Allison 1989


I was actually referring to Stormtruth but as long as yall are both talking about allison '89 then I feel kinda stupid right now...lol
0 likes   

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#448 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:23 pm

Still, this isn't even a TC yet and you are calling it a Waste of Time? For all we no this will stall over the central GOM and become a Cat-5. (What I just posted about this being a Cat-5 is not to be taken seriously).
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#449 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:24 pm

1989:
Image

2001:
Image

Similar tracks, same name!!!
0 likes   

User avatar
Starburst
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 484
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 11:03 pm
Location: Beeville, TX
Contact:

#450 Postby Starburst » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:24 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:compared to the threat Daniel ACTUALLY poses to the USA, this is but a waste of time. A sheared TD or a weak TS is going to be given a whole 5 minutes by me, much like Grace/Jimena in 2003


Well to those of us that are facing potential flooding from this system it is not a waste of time. Derek I have always respected your opinion, your discussions, etc. but let me tell you something when you make a statement like that you loose alot in my book. Not only is it rude it is unprofessional and I for one will not give you or your discussions even 5 minutes of my time.
0 likes   

curtadams
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1122
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: Orange, California
Contact:

#451 Postby curtadams » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:24 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:compared to the threat Daniel ACTUALLY poses to the USA, this is but a waste of time. A sheared TD or a weak TS is going to be given a whole 5 minutes by me, much like Grace/Jimena in 2003

I don't see that. IMO the tropicalish low in SE Texas last month did as much harm as a 50 kt TS Daniel on the Highway to Hana would. And it's not like we can't pay attention to both.
0 likes   

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#452 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:25 pm

Invest 98L has alot more time over water than Allison of 2001 had.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

#453 Postby Thunder44 » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:25 pm

HurricaneHunter914 wrote:Still, this isn't even a TC yet and you are calling it a Waste of Time? For all we no this will stall over the central GOM and become a Cat-5. (What I just posted about this being a Cat-5 is not to be taken seriously).


Let's be realistic here. It won't do anything like that.
0 likes   

Hohwxny

#454 Postby Hohwxny » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:26 pm

HurricaneHunter914 wrote:
compared to the threat Daniel ACTUALLY poses to the USA, this is but a waste of time. A sheared TD or a weak TS is going to be given a whole 5 minutes by me, much like Grace/Jimena in 2003


Not to be mean but I am getting annoyed by these "This storm is just a waste of time" comments. So far we have seen two of them and IMO those comments are a waste of time. Because to some people these week TDs are NOT a waste of time.


I think what Derek is sayingis that Hurricane Daniel poses a more serious threat to Hawaii than 98L does to Texas, and, therefore, spending more time on 98L than on Hurricane Daniel is a waste of time.
0 likes   

GalvestonDuck
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 15941
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)

#455 Postby GalvestonDuck » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:27 pm

cheezyWXguy wrote:
stormtruth wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:compared to the threat Daniel ACTUALLY poses to the USA, this is but a waste of time. A sheared TD or a weak TS is going to be given a whole 5 minutes by me, much like Grace/Jimena in 2003


Allison was a big waste of time too :roll:


allison? as in the costliest TS in U.S. History?
Ya, 5 Billion dollar TS's are a waste :roll:


I'm fairly certain Stormtruth was being sarcastic.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#456 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:28 pm

Furthermore, Daniel may pose a greater threat, windwise, but since Daniel is a small cyclones moving faster than our large disturbance I think the greatest menace here is our disturbance. As we all know, rain causes more damage and deaths than wind, especially if those winds come from a tropical storm.
Last edited by HURAKAN on Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29114
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

#457 Postby vbhoutex » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:28 pm

After a quick look at SAT loops, both infrared and visible, I tend to think that a LLCC could be attempting to form just about where Matt is talking about or somewhere close to that vicinity. It is way too close to the coast to develop quickly, if indeed anything is even happening, so I wouldn't worry about any rapid intensification into anything of major sinificance, except a major rainmaker for the TX and possibly Mexican coasts. I have nothing else to base this on except for this quick look at the sat loops. JMHO.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#458 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:28 pm

The GOM is a heavy rain threat, which is handled by locla NWS offices.

I am concerned about mudslides in Hawaii due to the very mountainous terrain on the big island (Jimena missed in 2003 and still brough 10 inches of rain with the upslope flow, Daniel may bring more, which is why 90% of my focus on on Daniel)

Of course, if a LLC does form, you can bet I will still write forecasts and then highlight the flooding threat
0 likes   

User avatar
dixiebreeze
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5140
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:07 pm
Location: crystal river, fla.

#459 Postby dixiebreeze » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:30 pm

There might not be a S2K at all if any tropical activity was a waste of time. That's sort of why we're all here, enjoying the companionship of tropical weather watchers. :D
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#460 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:30 pm

I think what Derek is sayingis that Hurricane Daniel poses a more serious threat to Hawaii than 98L does to Texas, and, therefore, spending more time on 98L than on Hurricane Daniel is a waste of time.

That is precisely what I am saying, and possibly a greater rainfall and flooding threat as well due to the mountains. The Big Island has a 13,000 foot mountain
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: dl20415, riapal, wileytheartist and 56 guests