98L invest,W.GOM,Comments,Sat Pics,Models Thread

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Yankeegirl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3417
Age: 49
Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 11:59 pm
Location: Cy-Fair, Northwest Houston
Contact:

#421 Postby Yankeegirl » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:01 pm

:uarrow: :uarrow: :uarrow: :uarrow: :uarrow: :uarrow: :uarrow:

LOL!!!


:roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao:
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23021
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#422 Postby wxman57 » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:01 pm

As far as I can discern, there is no area of low pressure at the surface, and no LLC. Pressures across the western Gulf have actually risen. Any MLC appears to be on the coast of Mexico and moving NNW (inland). Wind shear remains high. Chances of development appear low. That's why recon was cancelled.

However, the system will likely produce heavy squalls into the lower Texas coast by tonight and through Tuesday, spreading northward across much of east Texas late Tue/Wed. Rainfall amounts may top 5-10 inches in coastal sections of Texas over the next few days, maybe more.
0 likes   

shaggy
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 655
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:14 pm
Location: greenville, n.c.

#423 Postby shaggy » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:02 pm

looks good today but still very close to land and it may not have alot of time.I guess a watch and wait approach is the way to go but hopefuly it will bring some rain to places that need it!I see the spin but its really close to the coastline now!
0 likes   

User avatar
drezee
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3664
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 12:49 pm
Location: FL

#424 Postby drezee » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:03 pm

from Discussion:

LATEST SATELLITE PICTURES AND
SURFACE DATA SHOW THAT A SURFACE LOW IS FORMING NEAR TAMPICO IN
MEXICO.
0 likes   

User avatar
hicksta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1108
Age: 35
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:16 am
Location: Kemah Texas/ Baton Rogue LA

#425 Postby hicksta » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:03 pm

wx, what about around seabrook think we will get some rain. Just got a new truck and need to get some rain to go mudding
0 likes   

User avatar
stormtruth
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 651
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 4:15 pm

#426 Postby stormtruth » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:06 pm

Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:Christ!


Almost time to hug your Dad again Matt. :D
0 likes   

Weatherfreak000

#427 Postby Weatherfreak000 » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:07 pm

wxman57 wrote:As far as I can discern, there is no area of low pressure at the surface, and no LLC. Pressures across the western Gulf have actually risen. Any MLC appears to be on the coast of Mexico and moving NNW (inland). Wind shear remains high. Chances of development appear low. That's why recon was cancelled.

However, the system will likely produce heavy squalls into the lower Texas coast by tonight and through Tuesday, spreading northward across much of east Texas late Tue/Wed. Rainfall amounts may top 5-10 inches in coastal sections of Texas over the next few days, maybe more.



Can you maybe explain to me why you think chances of development are slim when the NHC is liking it now more then ever and the TCFA being issued?


No offense wxman, but I have your word to take about pressures rising and there being no area of low pressure where the NHC's TWO said this had a surface low.


And to be honest that's hard to go against, so is it right for the NHC to say things are that untrue you think? Because i've been noticing your posts for a while and reading the NHC's wording and sometimes I see these differences.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#428 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:08 pm

Any low-pressure appears to be just above the surface.

However, if this were to remain offshore for say 36 hours, a TS Allison (1989 version) would not be impossible. It formed under similar conditions right on the coast
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6132
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

#429 Postby cheezyWXguy » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:09 pm

Dude...do you know much those very religious people in the country/ world would be offended by naming a hurricane Christ? Some people would say that theyre anti's of each other
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23693
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#430 Postby gatorcane » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:09 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:Any low-pressure appears to be just above the surface.

However, if this were to remain offshore for say 36 hours, a TS Allison (1989 version) would not be impossible. It formed under similar conditions right on the coast


So I take it you don't think the BOC system is garbage anymore? :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
Swimdude
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2270
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:57 am
Location: Houston, TX

#431 Postby Swimdude » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:12 pm

gatorcane wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:Any low-pressure appears to be just above the surface.

However, if this were to remain offshore for say 36 hours, a TS Allison (1989 version) would not be impossible. It formed under similar conditions right on the coast


So I take it you don't think the BOC system is garbage anymore? :lol:


Some of us are just more positive than others. That's all I've got to say.
0 likes   

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#432 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:13 pm

I'm confused because now I have alot of questions:
Does this have a surface low?
Does this have an LLC?
Are chances for this to become a TC big or small?

The reasons for all these questions is because some people saying one thing about 98L and other people are saying different things.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23693
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#433 Postby gatorcane » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:14 pm

Swimdude wrote:
gatorcane wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:Any low-pressure appears to be just above the surface.

However, if this were to remain offshore for say 36 hours, a TS Allison (1989 version) would not be impossible. It formed under similar conditions right on the coast


So I take it you don't think the BOC system is garbage anymore? :lol:


Some of us are just more positive than others. That's all I've got to say.


its amazing how things change. Yesterday at this time I was even writing this off - and suddenly it goes nuts...

I'll take my serving of crow please 8-):eek:
Last edited by gatorcane on Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#434 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:14 pm

compared to the threat Daniel ACTUALLY poses to the USA, this is but a waste of time. A sheared TD or a weak TS is going to be given a whole 5 minutes by me, much like Grace/Jimena in 2003
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#435 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:15 pm

stormtruth wrote:
Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:Christ!


Almost time to hug your Dad again Matt. :D


Can't :cry:
0 likes   

User avatar
stormtruth
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 651
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 4:15 pm

#436 Postby stormtruth » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:16 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:compared to the threat Daniel ACTUALLY poses to the USA, this is but a waste of time. A sheared TD or a weak TS is going to be given a whole 5 minutes by me, much like Grace/Jimena in 2003


Allison was a big waste of time too :roll:
0 likes   

GalvestonDuck
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 15941
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)

#437 Postby GalvestonDuck » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:16 pm

Named storm or not, it's worth my time just to know what the weather is going to be like in my area for the next couple of days.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6685
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#438 Postby Stormcenter » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:16 pm

wxman57 wrote:As far as I can discern, there is no area of low pressure at the surface, and no LLC. Pressures across the western Gulf have actually risen. Any MLC appears to be on the coast of Mexico and moving NNW (inland). Wind shear remains high. Chances of development appear low. That's why recon was cancelled.

However, the system will likely produce heavy squalls into the lower Texas coast by tonight and through Tuesday, spreading northward across much of east Texas late Tue/Wed. Rainfall amounts may top 5-10 inches in coastal sections of Texas over the next few days, maybe more.


So you are disagreeing with the NHC, correct?

LATEST SATELLITE PICTURES AND
SURFACE DATA SHOW THAT A SURFACE LOW IS FORMING NEAR TAMPICO IN
MEXICO.
Last edited by Stormcenter on Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23693
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#439 Postby gatorcane » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:17 pm

stormtruth wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:compared to the threat Daniel ACTUALLY poses to the USA, this is but a waste of time. A sheared TD or a weak TS is going to be given a whole 5 minutes by me, much like Grace/Jimena in 2003


Allison was a big waste of time too :roll:


Well I can't imagine this system getting very strong since it is so close to land....but I still will eat my crow!
0 likes   

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#440 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:18 pm

compared to the threat Daniel ACTUALLY poses to the USA, this is but a waste of time. A sheared TD or a weak TS is going to be given a whole 5 minutes by me, much like Grace/Jimena in 2003


Not to be mean but I am getting annoyed by these "This storm is just a waste of time" comments. So far we have seen two of them and IMO those comments are a waste of time. Because to some people these week TDs are NOT a waste of time.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: chris_fit, MarioProtVI, riapal, sasha_B and 47 guests