Patrick99 wrote:It wouldn't be worse than in New Orleans.....at least in Tampa, the surge would begin receding once the storm passed.
New Orleans is a very unique situation.
I agree.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
TSmith274 wrote:jschlitz wrote:In theory, yes one could argue that a "Katrina" in LA would do damage to a larger area of SE Lousiana given the large swath of land at or below sea level. But the same storm would cause more losses in Tampa-St. Pete because there is significantly more urbanized and developed land that will be directly impacted. It's just that simple. It comes down to numbers and how many houses, office buildings, airports, etc. are crowded into a given space of land. That's exactly why a storm making landfall on Matagorda bay here in Texas is much less of a concern than one in Galveston. The surge itself may be similiar in size but the losses/outcome will be vastly different.
Bret '99 was a powerful hurricane but it didn't do much damage because it hit a sparesly populated area.
Not sure how you can make that assumption. New Orleans is a highly industrialized area with a population density making it the 5th most densely populated city in the US. Tampa ranks 38th in population density. New Orleans was #2 on the FEMA list of worst possible disasters... #1 being a terrorist attack on NYC, and #3 being a major earthquake in L.A.
I'd love to be wrong, as it would make the case for investment in New Orleans easier. Unfortunately, I don't think I am.
TSmith274 wrote:jschlitz wrote:In theory, yes one could argue that a "Katrina" in LA would do damage to a larger area of SE Lousiana given the large swath of land at or below sea level. But the same storm would cause more losses in Tampa-St. Pete because there is significantly more urbanized and developed land that will be directly impacted. It's just that simple. It comes down to numbers and how many houses, office buildings, airports, etc. are crowded into a given space of land. That's exactly why a storm making landfall on Matagorda bay here in Texas is much less of a concern than one in Galveston. The surge itself may be similiar in size but the losses/outcome will be vastly different.
Bret '99 was a powerful hurricane but it didn't do much damage because it hit a sparesly populated area.
Not sure how you can make that assumption. New Orleans is a highly industrialized area with a population density making it the 5th most densely populated city in the US. Tampa ranks 38th in population density. New Orleans was #2 on the FEMA list of worst possible disasters... #1 being a terrorist attack on NYC, and #3 being a major earthquake in L.A.
I'd love to be wrong, as it would make the case for investment in New Orleans easier. Unfortunately, I don't think I am.
Derek Ortt wrote:Orlando already got theirs from Charley
A Tampa strike may mean the core misses Orlando to the north, while a track slightly south from a similar strength, but larger storm than Charley will result in at least category 2 conditions in the center of the city
stpeteweathergal wrote:Many analysts have reported their thoughts about a direct hit storm for Pinellas County.
In the end, they all advise that we evacuate to shelters in the county on higher ground.
It's been said that there is no way we can safely get everybody out of the county in time.
I've lived here all my life (40 years) and I've heard MANY people who say
they'll "just head to Orlando or out of state" if the big one comes. It's sad to know that if we get a Cat 3 or higher, there will be a lot of damage and loss.
At least I know I'm prepared and have a good local shelter to go to.
hurricanefloyd5 wrote:i have to Disagree i dont think it "COULD" i think it "WILL" happen may not be this year nor the next year but we will see another Katrina Type storm and roll right into Tampa Bay Area and this is realality folks so be prepared in Tampa Bay and dont take the Hurricane Warnings lightly because Tampa is a sitting duck awaiting to be slammed and that gose as well for Orlando!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PS. Remember folks if Tampa Bay gets slammed like New Orleans Did then Orlando watch out as well!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Derek Ortt wrote:and there is a reason why Charley was Orlando's worst hurricane ever
Majors that far inland are nearly impossible. To even get 75KT sustained in Orlando with gusts approaching 100KT is a very rare event, which I do not believe has ever happened before
hurricanefloyd5 wrote:
not true look at donna hit orlando as a cat.3
Users browsing this forum: Hurricaneman, Tak5 and 30 guests