91L invest Bahamas,Comments,Sat Pics,Models Thread #1

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
tgenius
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1160
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 5:31 pm
Location: Miami, FL

#41 Postby tgenius » Fri Jun 23, 2006 8:34 am

So what would be probability we get Beryl out of this? 2 Possible Storms in June.... pretty crazy I'd say.

It's interesting to note when you follow the tropics daily, things tend to go by REAL slow compared to me not watching so much last year and it flying by
0 likes   

User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:

#42 Postby skysummit » Fri Jun 23, 2006 8:35 am

Here's what I think this morning:

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23021
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#43 Postby wxman57 » Fri Jun 23, 2006 8:36 am

Here's yet another model plot. I have the BAMS on here, too. Of course, you can always ignore the LBAR and AH98E (climo) model. All BAM models say the same - wnw-nw toward Jacksonville. Dynamic models in good agreement as well on the movement of the upper low. Of course, I always advise being wary of the BAM models north of 20N latitude as they're designed for low-latitude systems where the steering currents aren't changing.

Wind shear still looks very strong over it (watch how you interpret those wind shear maps - look at a good, long WV loop). This is not so much a tropical system as a hybrid low.

I think there's a good chance it'll be upgraded to a TD tomorrow due to its proximity to land, but conditions aloft don't favor much intensification before it moves inland.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Trader Ron
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 928
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 7:25 pm
Location: Naples,Fl
Contact:

#44 Postby Trader Ron » Fri Jun 23, 2006 8:36 am

Two of those models are worthless. I'll wait for the GFDL.
0 likes   

User avatar
drezee
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3664
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 12:49 pm
Location: FL

#45 Postby drezee » Fri Jun 23, 2006 8:36 am

3.5mb 24 hour pressure falls off FL coast

http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.p ... t=M&tz=STN
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23021
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#46 Postby wxman57 » Fri Jun 23, 2006 8:38 am

skysummit wrote:Here's what I think this morning:

Image


Over the years, I've learned that the exposed low-level swirls rotating around a larger area of low pressure are NOT what we should focus on for development. You are correct, we need to watch where the thunderstorms are. A tropical system will tend to form beneath the thunderstorms, not from a naked swirl.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23021
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#47 Postby wxman57 » Fri Jun 23, 2006 8:39 am

Trader Ron wrote:Two of those models are worthless. I'll wait for the GFDL.


Besides the LBAR, which I agree is worthless, what other model on my plot is worthless? The CARQ is not a model, by the way, it's the historical track of the disturbance.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6685
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#48 Postby Stormcenter » Fri Jun 23, 2006 8:41 am

As long as it stays away from the GOM I'm a happy camper. :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

#49 Postby Thunder44 » Fri Jun 23, 2006 8:44 am

First T numbers from Dvorak:

23/1215 UTC 26.7N 73.6W T1.0/1.0

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/positions.html
0 likes   

User avatar
jdray
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 853
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 10:07 pm
Location: NE Florida

#50 Postby jdray » Fri Jun 23, 2006 8:46 am

Big Bend of Florida and NE Florida were supposed to see little activity.

So far Alberto hits the Big Bend area, then the second "potential" storm might hit NE Fla/Ga coastline.

There goes most mets outlooks.
0 likes   

bucman1
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 394
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 7:59 am

#51 Postby bucman1 » Fri Jun 23, 2006 8:48 am

Kinda hard to forecast a track when we don't know where the center of circulation is !
0 likes   

caneman

#52 Postby caneman » Fri Jun 23, 2006 8:49 am

bucman1 wrote:Kinda hard to forecast a track when we don't know where the center of circulation is !


And I would add to wait for the new GFS, UKMET, CMC and NOGAPS
0 likes   

User avatar
Stratusxpeye
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 686
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 10:40 am
Location: Tampa, Florida
Contact:

#53 Postby Stratusxpeye » Fri Jun 23, 2006 8:50 am

bucman1 wrote:Kinda hard to forecast a track when we don't know where the center of circulation is !


Great post I was just getting ready to post that. Before we had a handle on Alberto's center it was a Texas storm for sure some even though Mexico. We need to have it establish its exact llc center for models to initiate and then the plots will be a little better right now id say its almost all useless.
0 likes   

tgenius
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1160
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 5:31 pm
Location: Miami, FL

#54 Postby tgenius » Fri Jun 23, 2006 8:54 am

jdray wrote:Big Bend of Florida and NE Florida were supposed to see little activity.

So far Alberto hits the Big Bend area, then the second "potential" storm might hit NE Fla/Ga coastline.

There goes most mets outlooks.


At Least Alberto didn't cause havok to FL in the $$ department. :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
Trader Ron
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 928
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 7:25 pm
Location: Naples,Fl
Contact:

#55 Postby Trader Ron » Fri Jun 23, 2006 8:58 am

wxman57 wrote:
Trader Ron wrote:Two of those models are worthless. I'll wait for the GFDL.


Besides the LBAR, which I agree is worthless, what other model on my plot is worthless? The CARQ is not a model, by the way, it's the historical track of the disturbance.


I concur with you that the LBAR and NHCA98E are worthless. I was typing the post just before you posted. It wasn't directed at you.
0 likes   

User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:

#56 Postby skysummit » Fri Jun 23, 2006 9:00 am

Remember though, the 98E is not actually a model. It's a statistical model.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6685
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#57 Postby Stormcenter » Fri Jun 23, 2006 9:01 am

Guess where the center is forming?

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-vis.html
0 likes   

User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:

#58 Postby skysummit » Fri Jun 23, 2006 9:04 am

Anyone see that the SHIPS takes it up to 62kts in 108 hours...

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
HurricaneGirl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5839
Age: 60
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:45 am
Location: Clare, Michigan
Contact:

#59 Postby HurricaneGirl » Fri Jun 23, 2006 9:06 am

wxman57 wrote:Here's yet another model plot. I have the BAMS on here, too. Of course, you can always ignore the LBAR and AH98E (climo) model. All BAM models say the same - wnw-nw toward Jacksonville. Dynamic models in good agreement as well on the movement of the upper low. Of course, I always advise being wary of the BAM models north of 20N latitude as they're designed for low-latitude systems where the steering currents aren't changing.

Wind shear still looks very strong over it (watch how you interpret those wind shear maps - look at a good, long WV loop). This is not so much a tropical system as a hybrid low.

I think there's a good chance it'll be upgraded to a TD tomorrow due to its proximity to land, but conditions aloft don't favor much intensification before it moves inland.

Image


:eek: Holy Crap! :eek:
0 likes   

curtadams
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1122
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: Orange, California
Contact:

#60 Postby curtadams » Fri Jun 23, 2006 9:06 am

skysummit wrote:Here's what I think this morning:
Image

If you look at the overall low level circulation that's obviously the master center of the invest. All the low clouds are revolving around it, including the naked swirls. Plus convection is firing up there at a time of day it normally wanes. Definitely the place to look.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 38 guests