GFS Model Output and Discussion

#21 Postby **SouthFloridawx** » Tue Jun 13, 2006 3:57 pm

Just posting gfs graphic model outputs here in the gfs graphic model output thread... not arguments necessary.

#22 Postby **fci** » Tue Jun 13, 2006 4:32 pm

HurricaneHunter914 wrote:
Dustin wrote:
HurricaneHunter914 wrote:Beryl has suddenly popped in my mind, but only time will tell.

LEts not hype things. Please.... every wave will not develop.

I'm not saying it will develop I'm saying it might develop. I think this forum needs to stop going straight to conclusions about what someone says and assume what they think that person meant.

Can y'all just calm down please???

If someone comments that a wave could be the precursor for the next named storm, it is conjecture not hype.
In my opinion, this is the forum where someone CAN make a comment like that .
it is their opinion, they don't pretend that they are an expert and saying "Beryl" comes to mind is the same thing as saying that the system looks like it has potential.
PLEASE, let's stop being so sensitive and just read the board and enjoy!
Ignore those that you don't respect and if you are really bothered by something someone says, send them a Private Massage (PM) and tell them.
If you get garbage back from them, then alert a MOD and don't use the board for petty arguements.
fci climbs off of soapbox.....

#23 Postby **SouthFloridawx** » Tue Jun 13, 2006 4:58 pm

EDIT: I agree with the above post 100% :uarrow:

I have noticed that a lot people have been arguing a lot on this board and I don't think its very respectful to the people who are here that are interested in the weather to learn, observe, educate, be educated or just want to browse to see what current conditions/forecasts and scientific data. I have noticed a lot of arguing. I have been guilty in the past of doing it also but, for the casual browser looking for a good forum to go to is NOT going to want to post or read post's if they are full of arguments and negative comments all the time. IMO

#24 Postby **cycloneye** » Tue Jun 13, 2006 4:59 pm

SouthFloridawx do you have the 18z run?

#25 Postby **SouthFloridawx** » Tue Jun 13, 2006 4:59 pm

cycloneye wrote:SouthFloridawx do you have the 18z run?

it has not been posted as of yet on the cyclone phase page. I am leaving work now but, if you see it please post the graphic. I will be home around 730 or so and will post it then if it is not here.

#26 Postby **skysummit** » Tue Jun 13, 2006 5:49 pm

18z is out now.
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... el_s.shtml

Aquawind · #27 Postby **Aquawind** » Tue Jun 13, 2006 6:15 pm

big tropical view - http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... loop.shtml

#28 Postby **SouthFloridawx** » Tue Jun 13, 2006 9:54 pm

#29 Postby **SouthFloridawx** » Wed Jun 14, 2006 8:42 am

6Z GFS 6-14-06

no advance · #30 Postby **no advance** » Wed Jun 14, 2006 9:34 am

Reminds me of a storm back in 74 that later went on to hit Miami.

#31 Postby **HURAKAN** » Wed Jun 14, 2006 9:37 am

no advance wrote:Reminds me of a storm back in 74 that later went on to hit Miami.

No storm struck Miami in 1974!!!

#32 Postby **skysummit** » Wed Jun 14, 2006 9:41 am

Here's the graphic I posted in the other thread.

jusforsean · #33 Postby **jusforsean** » Wed Jun 14, 2006 10:11 am

very interesting way to early for me to follow, my nerves cannot handle such a thought quite yet :eek:

HurricaneHunter914 · #34 Postby **HurricaneHunter914** » Wed Jun 14, 2006 10:12 am

skysummit wrote:Here's the graphic I posted in the other thread.

That's what I call a long range forecast, but its too far out they will change it over the next several days.

Rainband · #35 Postby **Rainband** » Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:05 am

fci wrote:
HurricaneHunter914 wrote:
Dustin wrote:
HurricaneHunter914 wrote:Beryl has suddenly popped in my mind, but only time will tell.

LEts not hype things. Please.... every wave will not develop.

I'm not saying it will develop I'm saying it might develop. I think this forum needs to stop going straight to conclusions about what someone says and assume what they think that person meant.

Can y'all just calm down please???

If someone comments that a wave could be the precursor for the next named storm, it is conjecture not hype.
In my opinion, this is the forum where someone CAN make a comment like that .
it is their opinion, they don't pretend that they are an expert and saying "Beryl" comes to mind is the same thing as saying that the system looks like it has potential.
PLEASE, let's stop being so sensitive and just read the board and enjoy!
Ignore those that you don't respect and if you are really bothered by something someone says, send them a Private Massage (PM) and tell them.
If you get garbage back from them, then alert a MOD and don't use the board for petty arguements.
fci climbs off of soapbox.....

Good Post. Everyone calm down and respect your fellow posters. If you do that the rest is easy :wink:

As for the "board not being the same as it used to be". It will be, those causing Problems will be issued a mandatory Evacuation from S2K. Trust me on that :wink:

#36 Postby **gatorcane** » Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:11 am

well that track the GFS is showing is dreadful for South Florida - I hope it is just way off on this one - :eek:

#37 Postby **skysummit** » Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:53 am

Well...the 12z shows nothing so I guess it was a one hit wonder. :cheesy:

The Hurricaner · #38 Postby **The Hurricaner** » Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:57 am

HURAKAN wrote:
no advance wrote:Reminds me of a storm back in 74 that later went on to hit Miami.

No storm struck Miami in 1974!!!

LOL!!!!

HurricaneHunter914 · #39 Postby **HurricaneHunter914** » Wed Jun 14, 2006 12:23 pm

Well one storm skidded Miami.

The Hurricaner · #40 Postby **The Hurricaner** » Wed Jun 14, 2006 12:25 pm

It didn't come from far away and it was weak... anyways back on topic.

GFS Model Output and Discussion

Who is online