Invest 90L,W.Caribbean,Comments,Sat Pics,Models Thread #5

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#61 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:00 am

Then where do you think its going then?
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Audrey2Katrina
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4252
Age: 76
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:39 pm
Location: Metaire, La.

#62 Postby Audrey2Katrina » Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:03 am

For my part, and I am by no means an authority; I feel this, whether it becomes Alberto or not (IMO the latter) is going to wind up moving over and into Mexico..

A2K.
0 likes   
Flossy 56 Audrey 57 Hilda 64* Betsy 65* Camille 69* Edith 71 Carmen 74 Bob 79 Danny 85 Elena 85 Juan 85 Florence 88 Andrew 92*, Opal 95, Danny 97, Georges 98*, Isidore 02, Lili 02, Ivan 04, Cindy 05*, Dennis 05, Katrina 05*, Gustav 08*, Isaac 12*, Nate 17, Barry 19, Cristobal 20, Marco, 20, Sally, 20, Zeta 20*, Claudette 21 IDA* 21 Francine *24

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#63 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:10 am

It just depends I guess.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#64 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:16 am

HurricaneHunter914 wrote:http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/avn.jpg

You guys sure the center is over Belize cause there is alot of convection over Belize right now.
yes, it is. Unless the NHC is lying.
0 likes   

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#65 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:17 am

No I doubt they would mislead a bunch of defenseless people like us. :wink:
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#66 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:18 am

CHRISTY wrote:Here are some Spaghetti models for 90L..

Image
All those models that show it going into FL (except the GFS) are not typically known as being the "best" models in predicting these type of systems, and I would just completely discount the LBAR (which is nearly always wrong). I like the BAMM track the best right now.

ALSO: is the CMC on drugs? It looks like it takes the system into a washing machine just east of the Yucatan. The NOGAPS also does the same thing.
Last edited by Extremeweatherguy on Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:21 am, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#67 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:19 am

I thought the GFS was a trusted model?
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#68 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:20 am

HurricaneHunter914 wrote:I thought the GFS was a trusted model?
that is why I said "(except the GFS)". The one problem about the GFS right now is where it initializes the low. Currently, the invest is a completely different low (in a different location) than what the GFS is portraying.
Last edited by Extremeweatherguy on Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:22 am, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#69 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:21 am

Woops I usually ignore the parenthesis. 8-)
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

goxweather
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:49 am

#70 Postby goxweather » Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:22 am

The Canadian does not do a good job with latent heat release and creates its own anticyclone aloft, even in heavily sheared environments...so you got to watch out for that.
0 likes   

spinfan4eva
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 295
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 1:27 am
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Contact:

#71 Postby spinfan4eva » Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:24 am

Tropical waves were at 21W, 53W, 65W & 77W, all showing no signs of development at this time.

Area of disturbed weather in the western Caribbean has increased as upper level shear has decreased and thus been classified as invest 90L by the Navy. Ship reports and buoys in this area are showing pressure falls. At one point today a ship was reporting a pressure down to 1005 millibars just off the coast of Belize. Organization is currently being kept in check by interaction with the land areas but the disturbance is expected to move north or northwestward over the next couple of days into a more favorable environment for development. Most reliable models now show significant development.

If development occurs, there are several possibilities as far as who will be affected. The GFS, Canadian as well as the GFDL hurricane model shows a strong tropical storm/minor hurricane approaching the Florida panhandle in about 4 days. The UKMET, and NOGAPS show a much weaker system moving West-northwestward into México. All models are very unreliable considering there is no true organized system to latch on to at initialization time of the models. These models will get a much better handle on what's going on if/when there is a definite system.

Latest from the National Hurricane Center as of this update.......

SATELLITE IMAGES CONTINUE TO SHOW A LARGE AREA OF DISTURBED WEATHER
EXTENDING FROM CENTRAL AMERICA NORTHEASTWARD ACROSS THE
NORTHWESTERN CARIBBEAN SEA...AND PORTIONS OF CUBA AND THE BAHAMAS.
THIS ACTIVITY IS PRIMARILY ASSOCIATED WITH A BROAD AREA OF LOW
PRESSURE NEAR EASTERN YUCATAN. THERE ARE NO SIGNS OF ORGANIZATION
AT THIS TIME...BUT ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS COULD BECOME A LITTLE
MORE FAVORABLE FOR SLOW DEVELOPMENT...IF THE AREA OF LOW PRESSURE
MOVES AWAY FROM LAND WITHIN THE NEXT DAY OR TWO.



**Update, waiting up for more models and the GFS and Canadian are in for 00Z Friday--All remains the same TC for Fla Panhandle--Of course, still no system for model initialization. UKMET coming in--dissipating TC for Texas.... Off to bed now---stay tuned!!


Elsewhere and otherwise, no tropical storm activity is expected in the Atlantic basin for the next few days.
0 likes   

spinfan4eva
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 295
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 1:27 am
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Contact:

#72 Postby spinfan4eva » Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:25 am

goxweather wrote:The Canadian does not do a good job with latent heat release and creates its own anticyclone aloft, even in heavily sheared environments...so you got to watch out for that.


Yes, but candian has been most right thusfar correct?
0 likes   

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#73 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:29 am

spinfan4eva wrote:Tropical waves were at 21W, 53W, 65W & 77W, all showing no signs of development at this time.

Area of disturbed weather in the western Caribbean has increased as upper level shear has decreased and thus been classified as invest 90L by the Navy. Ship reports and buoys in this area are showing pressure falls. At one point today a ship was reporting a pressure down to 1005 millibars just off the coast of Belize. Organization is currently being kept in check by interaction with the land areas but the disturbance is expected to move north or northwestward over the next couple of days into a more favorable environment for development. Most reliable models now show significant development.

If development occurs, there are several possibilities as far as who will be affected. The GFS, Canadian as well as the GFDL hurricane model shows a strong tropical storm/minor hurricane approaching the Florida panhandle in about 4 days. The UKMET, and NOGAPS show a much weaker system moving West-northwestward into México. All models are very unreliable considering there is no true organized system to latch on to at initialization time of the models. These models will get a much better handle on what's going on if/when there is a definite system.

Latest from the National Hurricane Center as of this update.......

SATELLITE IMAGES CONTINUE TO SHOW A LARGE AREA OF DISTURBED WEATHER
EXTENDING FROM CENTRAL AMERICA NORTHEASTWARD ACROSS THE
NORTHWESTERN CARIBBEAN SEA...AND PORTIONS OF CUBA AND THE BAHAMAS.
THIS ACTIVITY IS PRIMARILY ASSOCIATED WITH A BROAD AREA OF LOW
PRESSURE NEAR EASTERN YUCATAN. THERE ARE NO SIGNS OF ORGANIZATION
AT THIS TIME...BUT ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS COULD BECOME A LITTLE
MORE FAVORABLE FOR SLOW DEVELOPMENT...IF THE AREA OF LOW PRESSURE
MOVES AWAY FROM LAND WITHIN THE NEXT DAY OR TWO.



**Update, waiting up for more models and the GFS and Canadian are in for 00Z Friday--All remains the same TC for Fla Panhandle--Of course, still no system for model initialization. UKMET coming in--dissipating TC for Texas.... Off to bed now---stay tuned!!


Elsewhere and otherwise, no tropical storm activity is expected in the Atlantic basin for the next few days.


Interesting. Looks like we could have Alberto before the 3rd week of June ends.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

goxweather
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:49 am

#74 Postby goxweather » Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:34 am

spinfan4eva wrote:
goxweather wrote:The Canadian does not do a good job with latent heat release and creates its own anticyclone aloft, even in heavily sheared environments...so you got to watch out for that.


Yes, but candian has been most right thusfar correct?


I wouldn't say that the Canadian as been the best model. The model had a hurricane going straight for NOLA two days ago, and has been all over the GOM ever since. It was one of the first models to develop "something."
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#75 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:49 am

goxweather wrote:
spinfan4eva wrote:
goxweather wrote:The Canadian does not do a good job with latent heat release and creates its own anticyclone aloft, even in heavily sheared environments...so you got to watch out for that.


Yes, but candian has been most right thusfar correct?


I wouldn't say that the Canadian as been the best model. The model had a hurricane going straight for NOLA two days ago, and has been all over the GOM ever since. It was one of the first models to develop "something."
yeah, the Canadian has been horrible. Plus, those storms that were suppose to hit N.O. were coming from the eastern pacific; not the Caribbean.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6685
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#76 Postby Stormcenter » Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:49 am

HurricaneHunter914 wrote:I thought the GFS was a trusted model?


To some it is to others it's not. If you ask someone at the National Hurricane Center then it is.
0 likes   

curtadams
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1122
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: Orange, California
Contact:

#77 Postby curtadams » Fri Jun 09, 2006 1:30 am

spinfan4eva wrote:
goxweather wrote:The Canadian does not do a good job with latent heat release and creates its own anticyclone aloft, even in heavily sheared environments...so you got to watch out for that.


Yes, but candian has been most right thusfar correct?


Not really. It and the new NAM predicted a system in this mess first but they both said it should already be a TS by now. This kind of moderate-shear environment is precisely where the Canadian is normally at its worst. Most right in seeing potential but no more.

In general none of the models mean anything yet anyway. They are all predicated on having a system already there, and we don't. Cyclogenesis is a harder problem which the numerical models can't do well even under good circumstances. Worse, the current environment is about as difficult a cyclogenesis problem as you're going to see (a large area of disturbed weather with weak steering interacting with both land and variable moderate shear).
0 likes   

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#78 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Fri Jun 09, 2006 2:02 am

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/avn.jpg

Convection looks really deep right now.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Ivan14
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 184
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 10:49 am
Contact:

#79 Postby Ivan14 » Fri Jun 09, 2006 2:08 am

curtadams wrote:
spinfan4eva wrote:
goxweather wrote:The Canadian does not do a good job with latent heat release and creates its own anticyclone aloft, even in heavily sheared environments...so you got to watch out for that.


Yes, but candian has been most right thusfar correct?


Not really. It and the new NAM predicted a system in this mess first but they both said it should already be a TS by now. This kind of moderate-shear environment is precisely where the Canadian is normally at its worst. Most right in seeing potential but no more.

In general none of the models mean anything yet anyway. They are all predicated on having a system already there, and we don't. Cyclogenesis is a harder problem which the numerical models can't do well even under good circumstances. Worse, the current environment is about as difficult a cyclogenesis problem as you're going to see (a large area of disturbed weather with weak steering interacting with both land and variable moderate shear).

Isn't shear supposed to relax over the weak end? And if there is low sheer in the Gulf of Mexico this weekend Cyclogenesis is very possible. IMHO we will see Alberta early next week.
0 likes   

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#80 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Fri Jun 09, 2006 2:12 am

I think you mean "AlbertO".
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Chris90, Google [Bot] and 40 guests