New York City Hurricane Storm Surge Maps

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
zlaxier
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 101
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 1:44 pm

New York City Hurricane Storm Surge Maps

#1 Postby zlaxier » Mon May 22, 2006 10:36 pm

Not sure if anyone has posted this before, but I thought it was pretty cool.

Storm Surge maps for all the boroughs are at this link.

http://www.nyc.gov/html/oem/html/emols/emols.html

Communities in Zone A, represented by the following color orange , face the highest risk of life-threatening storm surge inundation. Zone A includes all low-lying coastal areas and other areas that could experience storm surge in ANY hurricane (Category 1 and higher) that makes landfall close to New York City.

Zone B, represented by the following color yellow, indicates areas at risk of storm surge inundation from a MODERATE (Category 2 and higher) hurricane.

Zone C, represented by the following color green, indicates areas at risk of storm surge inundation from a MAJOR hurricane (Category 3 & 4) making landfall just south of New York City. A major hurricane is unlikely in New York City, but not impossible.
0 likes   

User avatar
luvwinter
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 7:05 am
Location: Dayton, Ohio

#2 Postby luvwinter » Tue May 23, 2006 1:53 am

zlaxier wrote:Not sure if anyone has posted this before, but I thought it was pretty cool.

Storm Surge maps for all the boroughs are at this link.

http://www.nyc.gov/html/oem/html/emols/emols.html

Communities in Zone A, represented by the following color orange , face the highest risk of life-threatening storm surge inundation. Zone A includes all low-lying coastal areas and other areas that could experience storm surge in ANY hurricane (Category 1 and higher) that makes landfall close to New York City.

Zone B, represented by the following color yellow, indicates areas at risk of storm surge inundation from a MODERATE (Category 2 and higher) hurricane.

Zone C, represented by the following color green, indicates areas at risk of storm surge inundation from a MAJOR hurricane (Category 3 & 4) making landfall just south of New York City. A major hurricane is unlikely in New York City, but not impossible.



You would think those areas would go further inland wouldn't you. As well, some of the shelters are located pretty close to areas that are surge prone unless I am seeing things. :cheesy:
0 likes   

User avatar
terstorm1012
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1314
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:36 pm
Location: Millersburg, PA

#3 Postby terstorm1012 » Tue May 23, 2006 6:40 am

luvwinter wrote:
zlaxier wrote:Not sure if anyone has posted this before, but I thought it was pretty cool.

Storm Surge maps for all the boroughs are at this link.

http://www.nyc.gov/html/oem/html/emols/emols.html

Communities in Zone A, represented by the following color orange , face the highest risk of life-threatening storm surge inundation. Zone A includes all low-lying coastal areas and other areas that could experience storm surge in ANY hurricane (Category 1 and higher) that makes landfall close to New York City.

Zone B, represented by the following color yellow, indicates areas at risk of storm surge inundation from a MODERATE (Category 2 and higher) hurricane.

Zone C, represented by the following color green, indicates areas at risk of storm surge inundation from a MAJOR hurricane (Category 3 & 4) making landfall just south of New York City. A major hurricane is unlikely in New York City, but not impossible.



You would think those areas would go further inland wouldn't you. As well, some of the shelters are located pretty close to areas that are surge prone unless I am seeing things. :cheesy:


New York is hillier than it looks, and the ground rises fairly quickly away from the coastal innundation zones in a lot of the city.
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8247
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

#4 Postby jasons2k » Tue May 23, 2006 10:39 am

terstorm1012 wrote:New York is hillier than it looks, and the ground rises fairly quickly away from the coastal innundation zones in a lot of the city.


Exactly, this is something I have tried to point out many times. The highest point on Staten Island is over 400ft above sea level. The whole city won't flood.
0 likes   

User avatar
terstorm1012
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1314
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:36 pm
Location: Millersburg, PA

#5 Postby terstorm1012 » Tue May 23, 2006 10:50 am

jschlitz wrote:
terstorm1012 wrote:New York is hillier than it looks, and the ground rises fairly quickly away from the coastal innundation zones in a lot of the city.


Exactly, this is something I have tried to point out many times. The highest point on Staten Island is over 400ft above sea level. The whole city won't flood.


Yup, Todt Hill, highest point on the eastern Coastal Plain south of the hills on the Maine Coast.

the Fall line between Coastal Plain and Piedmont runs right through the city, actually through most mid-Atlantic and Northeastern cities (except maybe Boston.)
0 likes   

User avatar
luvwinter
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 7:05 am
Location: Dayton, Ohio

#6 Postby luvwinter » Tue May 23, 2006 4:47 pm

Glad to know that highest point is 400 feet above sea-level. I was not aware. I visited as a child but can't remember much about it. So pretty much they would need to worry more about winds and tornadoes correct?
0 likes   

User avatar
terstorm1012
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1314
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:36 pm
Location: Millersburg, PA

#7 Postby terstorm1012 » Tue May 23, 2006 4:52 pm

luvwinter wrote:Glad to know that highest point is 400 feet above sea-level. I was not aware. I visited as a child but can't remember much about it. So pretty much they would need to worry more about winds and tornadoes correct?


Well not exactly. Storm Surge flooding is a serious concern and due to the population density, some 2 million people within the city proper, and I believe the estimate is 2 million more in the suburbs of Long Island, and at least one million more in New Jersey need to get out of harms way.

The subways are also flood prone and have flooded during extreme high tides in the past. A major hurricane would put a lot of water underground that would take weeks to pump out.

On Manhattan everything south of Canal Street will be innundated in a severe hurricane, and JFK Airport will also be innundated.

And because NYC is unique in that a significant number of people don't drive or don't own cars because of the high expense, a lot of people will need to evacuate via mass-transit. Also traffic on a good day is bad so they really want people who are not in an evac zone to stay put and not add to the chaos. My concern is a New Orleans repeat. It is why NYC Emergency Management is really getting the word out. Some politicians don't think the plan is good enough but it is still evolving, and NYC Emergency Management is probably one of the better EMO units in the country.
0 likes   

User avatar
luvwinter
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 7:05 am
Location: Dayton, Ohio

#8 Postby luvwinter » Tue May 23, 2006 5:13 pm

They need to get moving with their plan then. Two million people is alot to move. I think their EMO is pretty good. If you look at how they handled 9/11 and then how New Orleans handled Katrina. Huge difference. I hate bringing up 9/11 but more people were killed by that tradgedy than Katrina. They had no warning and no prep time and yes they had some malfunctions but I think they dealt with it okay considering what happened. No the whole city did not flood but it did affect New York city in alot of other ways. I am not putting down anyone from New Orleans so if anyone is offended please don't be. Mayor Rudi Gulianni rose to the occasion and didn't pass the buck from what I saw. Mayor Ray Nagin had an entire week to prepare and get people out of harms way and failed miserably along with Blanco and Fema and passed the buck most of the way.
0 likes   

zlaxier
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 101
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 1:44 pm

#9 Postby zlaxier » Tue May 23, 2006 6:03 pm

Is this the worst case scenario possible?

A large Cat 5 Katrina type storm riding up the gulf stream off the Carolinas, then phasing with some frontal boundary? in the atmosphere and shooting up the east coast at 60-80mph and hitting just to the west of Manhattan as a 135 mph Cat 4....the eye hits northern New Jersey and Newark but the worst winds and surge in the right hand quadrant (because of the 60-80 mph forward motion) of the storm hit the city and long island....
0 likes   

User avatar
terstorm1012
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1314
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:36 pm
Location: Millersburg, PA

#10 Postby terstorm1012 » Tue May 23, 2006 7:04 pm

zlaxier wrote:Is this the worst case scenario possible?

A large Cat 5 Katrina type storm riding up the gulf stream off the Carolinas, then phasing with some frontal boundary? in the atmosphere and shooting up the east coast at 60-80mph and hitting just to the west of Manhattan as a 135 mph Cat 4....the eye hits northern New Jersey and Newark but the worst winds and surge in the right hand quadrant (because of the 60-80 mph forward motion) of the storm hit the city and long island....


I'd say improbable but not impossible.

Promets would probably know more.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#11 Postby Derek Ortt » Tue May 23, 2006 8:40 pm

you would need the best QG forcing ever to get a cat 4 in NYC
0 likes   

User avatar
terstorm1012
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1314
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:36 pm
Location: Millersburg, PA

#12 Postby terstorm1012 » Tue May 23, 2006 9:07 pm

FYI the History Channel program was similar to, and used much of the same imagery, but was not the same program as the Weather Channel show.

However in terms of information given the History Channel program was MUCH much better then the Weather Channel's program, which I thought was abysmally edited and otherwise poorly done in terms of info given.

Both programs mentioned Gloria which was kind of wimpy, but both forgot Bob, which probably was considerably stronger.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#13 Postby Derek Ortt » Tue May 23, 2006 9:16 pm

and Gloria did not produce cat 2 winds that the show reported

It may not have even been a hurricane at landfall based upon the surface obs. Gloria may have been a TS at landfall or a very marginal hurricane... should put things in perspective
0 likes   

User avatar
terstorm1012
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1314
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:36 pm
Location: Millersburg, PA

#14 Postby terstorm1012 » Tue May 23, 2006 9:25 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:and Gloria did not produce cat 2 winds that the show reported

It may not have even been a hurricane at landfall based upon the surface obs. Gloria may have been a TS at landfall or a very marginal hurricane... should put things in perspective


I thought there were gusts at Islip over 95mph? twister?
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#15 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Tue May 23, 2006 9:32 pm

terstorm1012 wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:and Gloria did not produce cat 2 winds that the show reported

It may not have even been a hurricane at landfall based upon the surface obs. Gloria may have been a TS at landfall or a very marginal hurricane... should put things in perspective


I thought there were gusts at Islip over 95mph? twister?
A strong TS or weak Cat. 1 hurricane can easily produce gusts to 95mph. During Hurricane Charley in Orlando, I saw Category 1 force sustained winds near 80mph, but the gusts were much higher (up to 105mph). On average, gusts can be 15-30mph higher than the sustained winds. To get 95mph wind gusts, the sustained winds were probably on the order of 65-80mph at landfall.
0 likes   

User avatar
terstorm1012
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1314
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:36 pm
Location: Millersburg, PA

#16 Postby terstorm1012 » Tue May 23, 2006 9:33 pm

That was probably what they meant by Cat 2 then, in the program. At least I'd hope so, most of the rest of the program was pretty good for its science.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: jlauderdal and 34 guests