SKETCHES OF A CATASTROPHE....PLEASE READ.

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
CHRISTY

SKETCHES OF A CATASTROPHE....PLEASE READ.

#1 Postby CHRISTY » Sun May 07, 2006 3:48 am

Hey guys this article came out today In the Miami Herald....once i read the full article it actually sent chills down my back....please take to read the article.The article comes with SOUTHFLORIDA STORM SURGE animations and much more.

One day, South Florida will be struck by a much more ferocious hurricane than those that hit last year - and experts predict potentially catasrophic results.

Image

HERE'S THE LINK...

http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/14518105.htm


LEAVE COMMENTS!
0 likes   

CHRISTY

#2 Postby CHRISTY » Sun May 07, 2006 4:18 am

these are some great stormsurge animations for SOUTHFLORIDA!We have been lucky for long time... :roll:
0 likes   

User avatar
jdray
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 853
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 10:07 pm
Location: NE Florida

#3 Postby jdray » Sun May 07, 2006 6:18 am

But it also shows just how lucky south florida is with regards to lower storm surges than the rest of the state.

feel fortunate there Christy, those same storms with throw 15+ foot surges into downtown Jacksonville, while only doing 7-10 feet near Biscayne Bay
0 likes   

Scorpion

#4 Postby Scorpion » Sun May 07, 2006 8:29 am

Especially a large-core hurricane similar to Katrina or Floyd. Major hurricane winds from central Palm Beach County down to north Miami.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#5 Postby Derek Ortt » Sun May 07, 2006 9:47 am

we will never see sustained major hurricane winds from Miami to Palm beach in a continuous line, since the major hurricane winds are found in very small streaks

we could see sustained hurricane force again, though, as we saw with Wilma
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#6 Postby Lindaloo » Sun May 07, 2006 9:55 am

South Florida was ALREADY hit by a major CAT5 hurricane.
0 likes   

Scorpion

#7 Postby Scorpion » Sun May 07, 2006 9:57 am

Lindaloo wrote:South Florida was ALREADY hit by a major CAT5 hurricane.


Andrew was very compact and hit a far-less populated and developed area.
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#8 Postby Lindaloo » Sun May 07, 2006 9:58 am

Still a major for South Florida.

Homestead was a less popluated area?
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#9 Postby Derek Ortt » Sun May 07, 2006 9:59 am

http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/14520617.htm

what a joke the new building code is. WHY DO WE NOT HAVE THE CAYMAN CODE?

A structure only has to survive gusts to 140? Wilma produced higher gusts than that at the tops of the high rises. This code is laughable. I'd feel more comfortable in the pre-Andrew structures, which were unfairly criticized for being poorly build, when they only failed under SUSTAINED winds over 140 m.p.h.
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#10 Postby Lindaloo » Sun May 07, 2006 9:59 am

I agree Derek.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#11 Postby Derek Ortt » Sun May 07, 2006 10:00 am

yeah. Homestead was so unpopulated that it only destroyed 80,000 homes and businesses
0 likes   

spinfan4eva
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 295
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 1:27 am
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Contact:

#12 Postby spinfan4eva » Sun May 07, 2006 10:56 am

jdray wrote:But it also shows just how lucky south florida is with regards to lower storm surges than the rest of the state.

feel fortunate there Christy, those same storms with throw 15+ foot surges into downtown Jacksonville, while only doing 7-10 feet near Biscayne Bay


Here is a link to a story ran back in december about what the storm surge in Jax would be in a cat 4 or 5 storm. http://www.firstcoastnews.com/news/loca ... ryid=48261
In reallity, it is very hard, though possible, for any hurricane to hit Jacksonville cause we're like a large inlet. How many hurricanes after beginning the turn more north, turn back west like Dora did? It would also be really hard for a hurricane of cat 4 or 5 intensity to make it to jacksonville cause we are so far north and the chances of one making it to our latitude at that intensity are slim at best. Im sure New york city has the same surge maps-that is surge maps for up to cat 5 and NYC will never be hit by a cat 5.
Last edited by spinfan4eva on Sun May 07, 2006 11:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

#13 Postby Evil Jeremy » Sun May 07, 2006 10:56 am

we are doomed.
0 likes   
Frances 04 / Jeanne 04 / Katrina 05 / Wilma 05 / Fay 08 / Debby 12 / Andrea 13 / Colin 16 / Hermine 16 / Matthew 16 / Irma 17

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

#14 Postby clfenwi » Sun May 07, 2006 11:06 am

From the article
First, scientists say the destructive power of a hurricane increases five-fold each time it moves one step up in category. Thus, Katrina2 could be expected to deliver 10 times more damage to South Florida than the real Katrina inflicted and Wilma2 could be expected to deliver 10 to 15 times the damage wrought by the real Wilma.


So, "Katrina2" could be expected to deliver 750 billion to 1.25 trillion dollars of damage? Discuss.

LATER: Never mind. In each case they are talking about the damage relative to the damage done to South Florida by the storm, not relative to (MS/LA). That didn't quite process with me the first time around.
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#15 Postby Lindaloo » Sun May 07, 2006 11:35 am

Derek Ortt wrote:yeah. Homestead was so unpopulated that it only destroyed 80,000 homes and businesses


I picked up on the sarcasm. lol. I thought that area had quite a bit if structural damage. Thanks for verifying that.
0 likes   

User avatar
hookemfins
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:56 pm
Location: Miami, FL

#16 Postby hookemfins » Sun May 07, 2006 12:04 pm

jdray wrote:But it also shows just how lucky south florida is with regards to lower storm surges than the rest of the state.

feel fortunate there Christy, those same storms with throw 15+ foot surges into downtown Jacksonville, while only doing 7-10 feet near Biscayne Bay


Those surge numbers were if Katrina were to hit the same area. However Andrew's storm surge was much higher than what was posted in the Herald. Andrew's surge was 17' and at my Parents house 16' a mile south of 17' surge.

A structure only has to survive gusts to 140? Wilma produced higher gusts than that at the tops of the high rises. This code is laughable. I'd feel more comfortable in the pre-Andrew structures, which were unfairly criticized for being poorly build, when they only failed under SUSTAINED winds over 140 m.p.h.


I remember when I was in the A/C business and I had a set of plans to be reviewed by Dade County Building and Zoning. Pre Andrew A/C units had to be secured by winds upto 125 mph. I questioned them about what a low number that is. 140 mph is better but should be a little higher.

I perfer the post Andrew South Florida Building Code as opposed to the present Florida Building code.
0 likes   

User avatar
milankovitch
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 243
Age: 40
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 11:30 pm
Location: Menands, NY; SUNY Albany
Contact:

#17 Postby milankovitch » Sun May 07, 2006 12:45 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:yeah. Homestead was so unpopulated that it only destroyed 80,000 homes and businesses


Do you have a link? Because I looked up the population of Homestead and according to the 1990 census it was 27,000. Does the 80,000 figure include unincorporated areas or surrounding towns?
0 likes   

User avatar
stormtruth
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 651
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 4:15 pm

#18 Postby stormtruth » Sun May 07, 2006 12:49 pm

Lindaloo wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:yeah. Homestead was so unpopulated that it only destroyed 80,000 homes and businesses


I picked up on the sarcasm. lol. I thought that area had quite a bit if structural damage. Thanks for verifying that.


Katrina 2 would impact a much larger area I think is the point. You and Ortt are talking about a Cat 5 but a much smaller area.
Last edited by stormtruth on Sun May 07, 2006 12:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
stormtruth
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 651
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 4:15 pm

#19 Postby stormtruth » Sun May 07, 2006 12:51 pm

The number of housing units destroyed (made uninhabitable and beyond economically-justified repair) by Hurricane Andrew in 1992 was estimated at over 28,000.

http://www.nahb.org/news_details.aspx?newsID=1572
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#20 Postby Derek Ortt » Sun May 07, 2006 2:54 pm

remember, Andrew also leveled Florida City, Cutler Ridge, and Leisure City. Not to mention a 10 foot surge at Coconut Grove
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], HurricaneBelle, scotto, TomballEd and 89 guests