Abolish FEMA Says US Senate

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
caribepr
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 10:43 pm
Location: Culebra, PR 18.33 65.33

#81 Postby caribepr » Mon May 01, 2006 7:40 pm

It's really interesting to see the difference between the US Virgin Islands and the British Virgin Islands when a hurricane strikes. This is NOT to rag on FEMA, because I support them. This is just to say...seeing the difference in the clean up and regaining a working infastructure after a disaster between gov't's depending on outside help and those that don't.
If you KNOW there is no one coming to help...amazing things happen. People work together more quickly and make it work. St. Martin, ravaged by a cat 5, same as the VI's, was, in a few years time, better than ever. No tarps on the roofs, repairs made, thriving. While places in the VI's still had tarps, STILL have damage evident, 15 and more years later. Point being, depending on outside help from govt is a cultural thing...based on a complicated structure of taxes, agencies, etc. People become dependant. I can't fault anyone for dependancy, even if I don't agree with it. But frankly, my own thinking has been, and I'll blame it on my Daddy, figure out how to help yourself because no one else is going to be there for you (even if they say they will be...hey, he was cynical!). That sounds harsh, but it has stood me well in my life, even though so often, thankfully, there have been people to be there for me so many times in my life when I needed them. But I don't ASSUME there will be.
This can be stretched WAY out of the line of thinking I'm talking about, but all I'm really saying is...if what you own is beyond your means or ability to do again, or have friends help you do again...if you owe more than you could ever afford to pay to have again...and if you live in a place where Nature can take it away, think about who you want to depend on this year. What really matters to you versus what you *think* you have/own. Maybe this doesn't make any sense, sorry if not. I just think of so many who lost so much last year and hope it doesn't happen again, to any of us. But if it does...how do we minimize our losses to a bearable level, things not loved ones?
Ok, I'll stop now :roll:
0 likes   

User avatar
Stephanie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23843
Age: 63
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:53 am
Location: Glassboro, NJ

#82 Postby Stephanie » Mon May 01, 2006 7:46 pm

What you say does make sense to me caribepr. We've just been led to believe that we should be able to rely on a system like FEMA since we support it with our tax dollars. Also, the culture, infrastructure, etc. is so different here in the US.

You Daddy was right! :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Gulf of Gavin Newsom

#83 Postby Steve » Tue May 02, 2006 10:52 am

>>Personally, it escapes me how anyone can single just FEMA and the Feds out for the mess that was certainly exacerbated by incompetence at the local (city) and State (Governor's office) in Louisana.

For the zillionth time, they told people to get out. Most of the 100,000 who stayed had no way out. You can't critize state and local government because communications go out and there's no way to effectively traverse the flood waters. Ultimately, the US Army Corps of Engineers designed the levees. But what really shows your political slant in this argument is that the GOP-dominated Congress pinned the majority of the blame on the federal government's response. Sorry, case closed. Believe in the President, Mike Brown and Chertoff if you feel so inclined. The Senate (run by the same party) certainly didn't. Sure, Mayor Nagin didn't do anything and hopefully will be voted out of office on the 20th. Sure Governor Blanco looked like a freaking deer in the headlights, but she too will likely get voted out in 2008 or 2009 (whenever her next election is). Unfortunately we won't have the same opportunity with President Bush.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Reality Check for Brent:

It's easy for you to sit up in North Alabama and make disingenuous statements where it's pretty obvious you have no idea what you are talking about. My situation in Metairie is absolutely no different than it was in October. I'm not living off the government, but fortunately, I still have my job. Because of the lack of housing, rental rates spiked to New York City levels (somewhat due to FEMA picking up the tab through April on rentals). Many people want to come home, but they simply can't. If they were tax-payers all along and not the proverbial welfare queens, what's your beef? I don't think any self-respecting American approves of anyone's lifestyle (= the able but unwilling to work) where they suck the sugar-teat of taxpayer funded largesse for their entire lieftimes. But this disaster is not comparable to anything that has happened in modern American history. Unless you have suffered first-hand losing everything you own, your domicile (residence) and have seen your family split up by 1,200 miles, you can't possibly know. What I do know is that I'm moving out of my trailer this weekend so my ex-wife can move in and out of her friend's house that she's been living with since the first week in September. I'll have a daily commute of approximately 100 miles and 2-3 hours (vs. my previous 8 minute/5 mile commute with no traffic). My kids are still in New York going to school and won't be home until at least July 8th. Most of their friends from our neighborhood are living in other cities in the region or in cramped houses with aunts, uncles, grandparents and such. Really, everyone should save their pontifficating for situations they truly understand from the prospective of shoes they themselves have walked in. Sometimes life doesn't go as planned. As a taxpayer, I appreciate that for once, I actually got something for my money instead of global geo-political wars.

/rant off with no hard feelings

Steve
0 likes   

User avatar
caribepr
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 10:43 pm
Location: Culebra, PR 18.33 65.33

#84 Postby caribepr » Tue May 02, 2006 12:37 pm

Steve,

Hope the rant helped (I know it helps me sometimes)! I pretty much ditto your post. And I can't imagine what you and your family are still going through, along with thousands of others - I can only pray your lives get back to *normal* sooner than later.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Gulf of Gavin Newsom

#85 Postby Steve » Tue May 02, 2006 1:35 pm

Thanks. FWIW, Peter King of all people drove through the ruins of the lower 9th Ward this past weekend while he was in town to cover the draft. A lot of people believe that until someone can see this thing first hand, they really can't comprehend the loss. Bear in mind that King went to a 2 square mile area. There are literally dozens of square miles of standing-in-place destroyed homes. Many on slabs (like the 4BR, 2600sf brick ranch-style house I grew up in) have to be raised 8' within 2 years or they will be ineligible for future flood coverage. How do you raise a large brick house on a slab 8'?

Steve
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Gulf of Gavin Newsom

#86 Postby Steve » Tue May 02, 2006 1:49 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
stormie_skies
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3318
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 9:25 pm
Location: League City, TX

#87 Postby stormie_skies » Tue May 02, 2006 2:17 pm

Is this thread still about FEMA, I hope? (Cuz I know nothing about nuclear power...LOL)

Someone in an earlier post mentioned the (justifiable) criticism of FEMA after Andrew ... understanding what happened between Andrew and Katrina is key here, I think. The post-Andrew criticisms of the federal response are strikingly similar to those we have seen in the wake of the botched Katrina response. Between the two storms, the department went from being a mess to being a model - and now, obviously, its a mess again. So FEMA can be fixed - we just need to look back and see how Clinton fixed it the first time.

Here is an article from 1995 that details it well: http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2005/0509.franklin.html

And here are a few things that I see as key to any FEMA revival:

- Seperate FEMA from DHS. This was a dumb idea to begin with. DHS has sucked the life out of the department and has completely changed its focus. FEMA needs to be its own department, complete with cabinet level access to the administration.

- FEMA needs to concern itself with disaster response - not terrorism per se. Many officials within the department have said that the excessive focus on potential terrorist attacks left natural disaster preparation lacking. That needs to change.

- FEMA officials - from cabinet level down - need to be emergency managers. The head of a department that is responsible for saving the lives of so many Americans should never be a political appointment.

- The federal government (including FEMA, but not limited to FEMA) needs to be trained thoroughly on what their powers are in an emergency situation. When Andrew struck help was delayed because FEMA officials were tangled up in red tape that legally had no bearing on the situation. The same exact thing happened after Katrina, even though in the wake of 9/11 we passed legislation giving the federal government even more power to respond in an emergency.

The local government in NOLA was not perfect. Neither were the local governments in south Florida after Andrew. We should know by now that local governments are inevitably going to be overwhelmed by events of this magnitude. The federal government has the power to act without them - and they need to learn to use that power effectively.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Gulf of Gavin Newsom

#88 Postby Steve » Tue May 02, 2006 2:34 pm

>>FEMA officials - from cabinet level down - need to be emergency managers. The head of a department that is responsible for saving the lives of so many Americans should never be a political appointment.

You mean that a horse-show judge shouldn't be entrusted with the lives and security of American citizens? :cheesy:

>>Between the two storms, the department went from being a mess to being a model - and now, obviously, its a mess again.

Not to overly politicize this thread, but you're saying a Bush had it in a mess, Clinton made it a model, and a Bush returned it to a mess. I didn't vote for any of these 3 guys, but clearly one of them had that aspect of government working a little better.

Steve
0 likes   

User avatar
gtalum
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4749
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Bradenton, FL
Contact:

#89 Postby gtalum » Tue May 02, 2006 2:52 pm

To be fair, during the Clinton administration FEMA had no disasters to deal with that were even close to the magnitude of Andrew or Katrina. FEMA would have performed just as badly at that time in a similar circumstance. The fact is that no federal government agency can be adequately prepared to handle that type of disaster effectively.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Gulf of Gavin Newsom

#90 Postby Steve » Tue May 02, 2006 3:12 pm

>>To be fair, during the Clinton administration FEMA had no disasters to deal with that were even close to the magnitude of Andrew or Katrina. FEMA would have performed just as badly at that time in a similar circumstance. The fact is that no federal government agency can be adequately prepared to handle that type of disaster effectively.

While I agree to a point, it is also fairly evident that they placed a greater premium on seeing a government that worked - at least in this respect. On the other hand, they did have to deal with:

1993 - Mississippi Flooding
1994 - Northridge Earthquake
1995 - Opal, OKC Bombing
1996 - Hurricane Fran and the resulting innundation of eastern NC
1997 - Ohio River Flooding
1998 - Georges
1999 - Floyd
2000 - OK/AR winter storm

While none of these items except perhaps the Mississippi River Flooding and Fran are high up in the all-time disaster list, saying they "would have performed badly" when they actually did quite well is at best an incomplete answer.

Steve
0 likes   

User avatar
stormie_skies
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3318
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 9:25 pm
Location: League City, TX

#91 Postby stormie_skies » Tue May 02, 2006 3:27 pm

Actually, the Northridge Earthquake was the most costly earthquake in US history....and the 1993 floods were the most costly flood event in US history, presumably until Katrina.

A record number of disasters were declared during Clinton's two terms - 348, to be exact.

Regardless, while I understand that no two events are the same and that no response will ever be perfect, everyone seems to agree that something must be done here. Once upon a time, we were happy with FEMA. Now, everyone pretty much agrees its a mess. I'm not saying that this is all that needs to be done, but I think it would be a start.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Gulf of Gavin Newsom

#92 Postby Steve » Tue May 02, 2006 4:09 pm

>>Actually, the Northridge Earthquake was the most costly earthquake in US history....and the 1993 floods were the most costly flood event in US history, presumably until Katrina.

My bad there. Northridge was insane. I posted it in the list of disasters but focused on Fran and the heartland floods. The earthquake was major-league.

Steve
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#93 Postby Air Force Met » Tue May 02, 2006 4:14 pm

Steve wrote:>>To be fair, during the Clinton administration FEMA had no disasters to deal with that were even close to the magnitude of Andrew or Katrina. FEMA would have performed just as badly at that time in a similar circumstance. The fact is that no federal government agency can be adequately prepared to handle that type of disaster effectively.

While I agree to a point, it is also fairly evident that they placed a greater premium on seeing a government that worked - at least in this respect. On the other hand, they did have to deal with:

1993 - Mississippi Flooding
1994 - Northridge Earthquake
1995 - Opal, OKC Bombing
1996 - Hurricane Fran and the resulting innundation of eastern NC
1997 - Ohio River Flooding
1998 - Georges
1999 - Floyd
2000 - OK/AR winter storm

While none of these items except perhaps the Mississippi River Flooding and Fran are high up in the all-time disaster list, saying they "would have performed badly" when they actually did quite well is at best an incomplete answer.

Steve


OK...I've got to chime in here.

I work in this area...and the statement you quoted is correct. It is your stance that is in COMPLETE error and you are the one making it political. How do I know? I've been working in the 5th Army, Now ARNORTH/NORTHCOM side of the house since 1988...and we have worked with FEMA through those disasters you listed.

My unit helped write the book on the military response with FEMA through these disasters and I can tell you that I do not know what individual or group you are listening to that is giving you this "information" that it was so great under Clinton and if it had been the "same" it would have worked "just as well"...but it is totally FALSE. I know this because I work it. I work in the planning area and I work with MSCA (Military Support to Civilian Authorities), which includes FEMA (and the CIA and the FBA).

And to lump what the US had been through with the 2004 season, 9/11, and all the other disasters with what FEMA faced during the Clinton years is also bad information on your part. How do I know this? Our OPS TEMPO. We support FEMA with bodies for the JMO and RTF/DCO deployment cells for weather. We have never been as busy as we have the last 2 years. Yes there were many disasters during the Clinton years...but they were SPACED and they did not TAX the agency's logistics.

Please...you do not know as much about this as you think...and I think you are trying to make some political hay where there is a lot less...and getting some information that is faulty. I worked under FEMA, VIA the military, through the Bush, Clinton and Bush years and to say it went from Bad to good to bad again is jsut plain ignorance and political hackery...and means you must be ignorant of the facts.

Why? Because from the time we have worked MSCA...it has done nothing but improved. However, logistical lines can only handle so much. And the bottom line is those lines (and MY PEOPLE!!!) were not taxed drastically by disaster relief in the 1990's...they have been in the 2000's. The other bottom line is this: If the LOCAL AND STATE GOVERNMENT had FOLLOWED THE PLAN we exercised with them back in the summer of 2004...and had done their part of the job they said THEY WOULD DO (and they DID NOT)...it would have made it a lot easier for the Federal Government to Do OUR JOB!

Period. And that is the truth. I was there when the Gov. and Parish Pres.'s signed the papers with Fema on how we would work evacs. Gues who didn't do their job first?

When I say I am going to cook dinner for 20 people...and 50 people show up...there are going to be a lot of people hungry and sitting on the floor. There was a plan to get the poor outta NOLA (and FEMA came up with it), it wasn't done.

RANT OFF/
0 likes   

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

#94 Postby WeatherEmperor » Tue May 02, 2006 4:21 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
Steve wrote:>>To be fair, during the Clinton administration FEMA had no disasters to deal with that were even close to the magnitude of Andrew or Katrina. FEMA would have performed just as badly at that time in a similar circumstance. The fact is that no federal government agency can be adequately prepared to handle that type of disaster effectively.

While I agree to a point, it is also fairly evident that they placed a greater premium on seeing a government that worked - at least in this respect. On the other hand, they did have to deal with:

1993 - Mississippi Flooding
1994 - Northridge Earthquake
1995 - Opal, OKC Bombing
1996 - Hurricane Fran and the resulting innundation of eastern NC
1997 - Ohio River Flooding
1998 - Georges
1999 - Floyd
2000 - OK/AR winter storm

While none of these items except perhaps the Mississippi River Flooding and Fran are high up in the all-time disaster list, saying they "would have performed badly" when they actually did quite well is at best an incomplete answer.

Steve


OK...I've got to chime in here.

I work in this area...and the statement you quoted is correct. It is your stance that is in COMPLETE error and you are the one making it political. How do I know? I've been working in the 5th Army, Now ARNORTH/NORTHCOM side of the house since 1988...and we have worked with FEMA through those disasters you listed.

My unit helped write the book on the military response with FEMA through these disasters and I can tell you that I do not know what individual or group you are listening to that is giving you this "information" that it was so great under Clinton and if it had been the "same" it would have worked "just as well"...but it is totally FALSE. I know this because I work it. I work in the planning area and I work with MSCA (Military Support to Civilian Authorities), which includes FEMA (and the CIA and the FBA).

And to lump what the US had been through with the 2004 season, 9/11, and all the other disasters with what FEMA faced during the Clinton years is also bad information on your part. How do I know this? Our OPS TEMPO. We support FEMA with bodies for the JMO and RTF/DCO deployment cells for weather. We have never been as busy as we have the last 2 years. Yes there were many disasters during the Clinton years...but they were SPACED and they did not TAX the agency's logistics.

Please...you do not know as much about this as you think...and I think you are trying to make some political hay where there is a lot less...and getting some information that is faulty. I worked under FEMA, VIA the military, through the Bush, Clinton and Bush years and to say it went from Bad to good to bad again is jsut plain ignorance and political hackery...and means you must be ignorant of the facts.

Why? Because from the time we have worked MSCA...it has done nothing but improved. However, logistical lines can only handle so much. And the bottom line is those lines (and MY PEOPLE!!!) were not taxed drastically by disaster relief in the 1990's...they have been in the 2000's. The other bottom line is this: If the LOCAL AND STATE GOVERNMENT had FOLLOWED THE PLAN we exercised with them back in the summer of 2004...and had done their part of the job they said THEY WOULD DO (and they DID NOT)...it would have made it a lot easier for the Federal Government to Do OUR JOB!

Period. And that is the truth. I was there when the Gov. and Parish Pres.'s signed the papers with Fema on how we would work evacs. Gues who didn't do their job first?

When I say I am going to cook dinner for 20 people...and 50 people show up...there are going to be a lot of people hungry and sitting on the floor. There was a plan to get the poor outta NOLA (and FEMA came up with it), it wasn't done.

RANT OFF/


wow. that deserves a big round of applause. Very informative and well sid AirForceMet! :D
0 likes   

User avatar
stormie_skies
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3318
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 9:25 pm
Location: League City, TX

#95 Postby stormie_skies » Tue May 02, 2006 4:25 pm

AFM, I've always respected your opinion on here. But you know, it is just an opinion - and it seems a bit overboard to be accusing others discussing this issue of "ignorance" and "political hackery" simply because they disagree with you. The opinion that something inside FEMA (not just inside local or state governments) has gone drastically wrong is not one that only Democrats or politicians hold - its a widespread opinion, one held by many people who are just as "in the know" as you are.

So is it possible, just for a second, to set aside accusations of political motives etc. and actually discuss what could be done better in the future? Or is that too much to ask of everyone?

I think the changes I outlined could be implemented equally well under a Republican or a Democratic administration. It just takes leadership.

Out of curiousity, do you think that there is anything that FEMA could learn from Katrina? Do you agree with the Senate about dissolving the agency? Where do you stand on the subject of the thread, given your experience?
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#96 Postby Air Force Met » Tue May 02, 2006 4:30 pm

WeatherEmperor wrote: wow. that deserves a big round of applause. Very informative and well sid AirForceMet! :D


Thanks...but it's not the first time I've said it...and I'm sure Steve doesn't know about it....because when I first started talking about this...it was right after the storm passed and he was still evacuated.

Go to this link

http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic ... t=#1041831

I talk a lot about the work we did on the plan on this thread. By also going to the "Hurricane Recovery and Aftermath" page and going to the timeframe of around the 31st of August to teh 3rd or so of Sept...you will see I speak volumes about the issue of FEMA and what happened.
0 likes   

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

#97 Postby WeatherEmperor » Tue May 02, 2006 4:32 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
WeatherEmperor wrote: wow. that deserves a big round of applause. Very informative and well sid AirForceMet! :D


Thanks...but it's not the first time I've said it...and I'm sure Steve doesn't know about it....because when I first started talking about this...it was right after the storm passed and he was still evacuated.

Go to this link

http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic ... t=#1041831

I talk a lot about the work we did on the plan on this thread. By also going to the "Hurricane Recovery and Aftermath" page and going to the timeframe of around the 31st of August to teh 3rd or so of Sept...you will see I speak volumes about the issue of FEMA and what happened.


thanks AFM. always appreciate the hard work you do.

<RICKY>
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#98 Postby Air Force Met » Tue May 02, 2006 4:40 pm

stormie_skies wrote:AFM, I've always respected your opinion on here. But you know, it is just an opinion - and it seems a bit overboard to be accusing others discussing this issue of "ignorance" and "political hackery" simply because they disagree with you. The opinion that something inside FEMA (not just inside local or state governments) has gone drastically wrong is not one that only Democrats or politicians hold - its a widespread opinion, one held by many people who are just as "in the know" as you are.

So is it possible, just for a second, to set aside accusations of political motives etc. and actually discuss what could be done better in the future? Or is that too much to ask of everyone?

I think the changes I outlined could be implemented equally well under a Republican or a Democratic administration. It just takes leadership.

Out of curiousity, do you think that there is anything that FEMA could learn from Katrina? Do you agree with the Senate about dissolving the agency? Where do you stand on the subject of the thread, given your experience?


First...I took issue...and it IS POLITICAL HACKERY to say it was BAD under Bush...great under Clinton and bad under Bush again. I've done the same job for 19 years...faithfully and I've seen it get better regardless of who the leader is. Bottom line is MORE is constantly being expected of the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT every year. The sense of entitlement is growing...and as that grows...people expect the fed to bail them out at an increasing rate. So...the sense that they worked great in 1993...well...if the culture was the same as today? They probably would not have thought that. That is what I take issue at and THAT is politics at its best and thats all it is. That is not a disagreement of opnion...it's a fact. It did not all of the sudden get better in Jan of 1993 and then turn dark in Jan of 2001. That is a charge with a political motive...pure and simple...one oblivious to facts.

There is a lot FEMA could learn...and the GOVT has take huge steps this year. I am deploying next week on a big pre-season exercise. But there are also some things that the American people need to learn....and one of them is this: years and years of political corruption at its finest (and we ALL KNOW IT) and failed social policies (when it becomes engrained in people that someone else will take care of them...instead of themselves) will get you New Orleans every time.

And that is the Government's fault. It's a lesson that should be learned...but that won't be.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Gulf of Gavin Newsom

#99 Postby Steve » Tue May 02, 2006 4:50 pm

Not sure where you're going with this. Many people who are apparently party partisans seem to continue to blame the governor and mayor as the major problems, when in fact the United States Senate (along with me) spreads the blame around with primary accusations at the Federal Government. I'm anti-party so I don't care. Like I said, I didn't vote for Clinton or Bush and I didn't vote for Nagin or Blanco (though I did vote for her twice as Lt. Governor where she did a pretty good job).

I do know, however, how inept FEMA has been in dealing with this particular disaster. I see it every day on the news and talk to people several times a day about their problems. If you want them detailed, I can cite you numerous examples of people who have trailers but no keys, didn't want trailers but got them anyway, told FEMA to remove their trailers so they could bulldoze their houses while getting calls every other day to lease them in to the trailers they weren't planning on using, etc. Then I could cite the e-mails between the one FEMA guy on the ground in the Superdome and Mike Brown's secretary - you know, the one where the FEMA guy was told Mr. Brown could not be bothered because he was dining in Baton Rouge (Ruth's Chris FWIW), and Baton Rouge was very hectic and he responded that he just ate an MRE with 30,000 of his closest friends and took a **** with them in the hallways of the Superdome).

Yeah, AFM, it's hardly anecdotal evidence that we're dealing with here. It was utter lunacy and sheer stupidity. I witnessed plenty of it first hand and could also offer my own experiences with this sad bureaucracy. But for now, I'll spare you the details.

You may note that it has not been addressed in this thread, but I have had nothing but praise for the military in the aftermath of Katrina (special mention to the Coast Guard for risking their lives to save others and the National Guard for being here on the ground after they took the streets back and also to assist with handling the relief efforts).

Now to your points:

I'm not listening to any "group" concerning FEMA as a cabinet level position. Apparently it was prepared - became prepared after Witt said give me 1 year to clean it up or scrap the whole thing if I can't - as you guys wrote the book.

>>And to lump what the US had been through with the 2004 season, 9/11, and all the other disasters with what FEMA faced during the Clinton years is also bad information on your part. How do I know this? Our OPS TEMPO. We support FEMA with bodies for the JMO and RTF/DCO deployment cells for weather. We have never been as busy as we have the last 2 years. Yes there were many disasters during the Clinton years...but they were SPACED and they did not TAX the agency's logistics.

So I don't get it. I'm offering some disasters that happened then (can't remember if WTC 1 was under his administration or President Bush's), but how can you call those "spaced out" when you're talking 2001, 2004 and 2005? There have literally been only 3 or 4 major disasters in the last 5 1/2 years. We had 9/11, three years later we had 4 storms of some consequence hit Florida, the next year we had 2 storms of much consequence hit Louisiana and 1 hit south Florida. Well It had been pretty much 10 or 11 months since the previous storm system until Hurricane Katrina hit SE LA, MS and Alabama. The response was PATHETIC. And yes, this includes state and local even though any logical view of the situation would state that there's no way a small city or small state has the resources to handle the largest disaster in modern US history. Only the Federal government can respond at the level needed. Oh yeah, and to keep the politics to a minimum, notice I didn't reference the 40% of the LA National Guard troops who were then-deployed or training for overseas missions. But yes, it's true.

>>Please...you do not know as much about this as you think...and I think you are trying to make some political hay where there is a lot less...and getting some information that is faulty. I worked under FEMA, VIA the military, through the Bush, Clinton and Bush years and to say it went from Bad to good to bad again is jsut plain ignorance and political hackery...and means you must be ignorant of the facts.

Ask the guy on the street. Whether the James Lee Witt era of FEMA might have been better prepared than a FEMA under DHS where actual FEMA people stated ON THE RECORD that had this been a terrorist attack, there would have been significiantly more resources deployed shows that you're military-political background probably hasn't fallen too far from the usual tree (acknowledging that military politics is across the board in some instances). Trust me, I'd take anyone over Chertoff/Brown. As noted above, Brown was a horse-show judge. Political patronage at its best that can be denied any way you see fit to do so. Answer that one. We're the ones dealing with the aftermath of this disaster. Ask anyone in Louisiana what they think of FEMA. Outside of the initial emergency assistance and the subsequent rental-assistance checks, you're not likely to hear anything good. In fact, the winner of this year's Tennessee Williams "Stella" scream in the French Quarter won specifically by yelling "FEMA." It's engrained into our heads here that FEMA=bad. If you call that bad information, I think those of us who have lived it first hand would beg to differ.

>> If the LOCAL AND STATE GOVERNMENT had FOLLOWED THE PLAN we exercised with them back in the summer of 2004...and had done their part of the job they said THEY WOULD DO (and they DID NOT)...it would have made it a lot easier for the Federal Government to Do OUR JOB!

Unfortunately the Feds didn't have it in either. It is my understanding that there were significant resources up in Barksdale and some of CENLA's miiltary installations. How were they supposed to get to New Orleans once the levees broke? I blame Mayor Nagin in part because the buses that were supposedly for the evacuation lay idle as the drivers fled. Yeah, that's on him. I blame the governor for not coordinating enough with the White House. That's on her. But then again, 50 governors were polled in the aftermath and either 49 or 50 stated that they didn't want the Federal Government taking precedent over state-controlled troops without consent. Apparently the red tape crosses the boundaries of this state all the way to Washington. Then you have the problem with the communications going out. I know. I was 200 miles away and the local phones there, despite gusts only to 20 in the area and no measurable rainfall - didn't work. No one's cell phones worked. Apparently ground communications were zero even for emergency responders and the military. One National Guard friend of mine in NE Alabama had one switch router working on the MS Gulf Coast. That was it. It was later to be figured out by consumers that text messaging was the only means of reliable communications. Our cell phones otherwise didn't work.

It is my understanding that the government has rectified this situation for future emergencies with mobile communications posts operating at some government frequency that is supposed to stand up. But you can't blame that on the state or city either. It just happened. And if you want to call that "getting better", I'd agree it is now - assuming it works, but it wasn't last year. So we might as well face that even though that exercise on Cat 5's was coordinated in 2004 (only one year prior), it didn't really matter. No one - local, state or federal, was prepared for what was to come.

>>Period. And that is the truth. I was there when the Gov. and Parish Pres.'s signed the papers with Fema on how we would work evacs. Gues who didn't do their job first?

Which Parish President - Broussard? New Orleans doesn't have a President-Council form of government. And while I'm in one of the only parts of Jefferson that took a major hit (water funneling in from the city), he called for everyone to get out once the NWS swung wildly on Friday afternoon in response to the 18z guidance that had come out. Remember, this was "florida's storm" up until that point. The state had set up phased evacuations, but that was to take a minimum of 72 hours to execute. Nonetheless, > 90% of the area's population did heed the warning to leave while they could. So if you would say that they didn't do their jobs or follow them to the letter or spirit of how they were written, I'd say you were mistaken. But as many European and Asian countries marved in the aftermath about all that talk America does, it was exposed that even in an American city in the Twenty-first century, there was a major underclass who live in the same abject poverty as many 3rd World denizens. So of the 100,000 people who stayed, somewhere between 90-95% were honest and poor citizens left with no way out. Maybe 5-10% were opportunists that made all the tv headlines.

But still, if you don't believe me, check out Peter King. My understanding that outside of infrastructure and trucking away debris, very little of the billions that have been appropriated have actually made their way down here. I guess that's the fault of the city and state too, right?

>>When I say I am going to cook dinner for 20 people...and 50 people show up...there are going to be a lot of people hungry and sitting on the floor. There was a plan to get the poor outta NOLA (and FEMA came up with it), it wasn't done.

Maybe. But when you can't even get a bottle of water to an 85 year old woman for 3 days, I say there's something seriously wrong. And yeah, wrong at the state and local level but especially at the federal level.

So if you have a beef with what I said, I think you should dispute things rather than drop the innuendos. Seriously. Find something in fact to dispute anything I've offered and I'll apologize. I don't think you can.

Yeah, I'm real sour on the GOP these days. But I'm also sour on the Democrats. I don't have a dog in either fight because I'm an independent. But I know that the Senate has the most data (despite being denied specific information by the White House) to point a finger in the primary direction. And that direction is at FEMA.

Steve
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Gulf of Gavin Newsom

#100 Postby Steve » Tue May 02, 2006 5:00 pm

>>The sense of entitlement is growing...and as that grows...people expect the fed to bail them out at an increasing rate. So...the sense that they worked great in 1993...well...if the culture was the same as today? They probably would not have thought that. That is what I take issue at and THAT is politics at its best and thats all it is. That is not a disagreement of opnion...it's a fact. It did not all of the sudden get better in Jan of 1993 and then turn dark in Jan of 2001. That is a charge with a political motive...pure and simple...one oblivious to facts.

See, I gotta call B.S. on that too. Most of us are not welfare cheats. We're taxpayers. We're not asking for the millions of dollars paid to family members in the WTC bombings. We just expect someone to deliver the goods. And at a cost of near $100k to loan us trailers for 18 months, I'd say there are serious problems. And the problems aren't that we are looking for handouts. But when you lose everything (in my case, all my stuff, my house, my kids and ultimately my marriage), someone's gotta step up. Afterall, I've been a taxpayer with no say how my money is spent since I quit college in 1984. I was gouged by insurance companies - flood and hazard - to the tune of $3,500 in 2005 alone. I played by the rules. I'm not looking for entitlements. But I do want a helping hand to get back on my feet. As it is with me, I'm doing it mostly on my own and quite inconveniently. For you guys, the planning goes on. For us, so does real life.

That's all I've got to say about that. But I will read your other link when I come into work tomorrow. I don't have internet at my camper since Cox won't hook me up except for cable.

Steve
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 66 guests