Whats up with the eastern pacific?

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
no advance
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 413
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 1:50 pm
Location: merritt is.

Whats up with the eastern pacific?

#1 Postby no advance » Tue May 02, 2006 11:17 am

Been very inactive the past few yrs. Season starts in two weeks looks like some moisture down there. What do you all think?
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#2 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Tue May 02, 2006 11:19 am

I think it will be more active then last year...More hurricanes and Majors likely.
0 likes   

User avatar
EDR1222
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1253
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2003 12:58 pm
Location: Melbourne, FL

#3 Postby EDR1222 » Tue May 02, 2006 11:52 am

Interesting that it has not been quite as active. Maybe its part of the cycle that some of the hurricane experts have been discussing with the Atlantic seeing heightened activity and other regions are not seeing as much.
0 likes   

User avatar
Epsilon_Fan
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 353
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 1:03 pm
Location: Charleston, SC

#4 Postby Epsilon_Fan » Tue May 02, 2006 11:56 am

it has been quiet so far out there... I checked the visible loop yesterday and there were only a couple blobs on the ITCZ.
0 likes   

HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

#5 Postby HurricaneBill » Tue May 02, 2006 2:20 pm

It's been in a less active cycle since 1995. Usually when the Atlantic is in an active phase, the EPAC is less active and vice-versa.
0 likes   

User avatar
AussieMark
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5858
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 6:36 pm
Location: near Sydney, Australia

#6 Postby AussieMark » Tue May 02, 2006 6:50 pm

also lack of El Ninos during the peak of the season has also resulted in lower numbers in recent years

1997 and 2002 were some of the most active in recent years and were El Nino years. especially with the hurricane and major hurricane counts

1995: 10/7/3
1996: 9/5/2
1997: 18/10/8
1998: 13/9/6
1999: 9/6/2
2000: 19/6/2
2002: 15/8/6
2001: 15/8/2
2003: 16/7/0
2004: 12/6/3
0 likes   

quandary
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 362
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 4:04 pm

#7 Postby quandary » Wed May 03, 2006 1:10 am

If Global warming really is responsible for an increase in hurricanes, we should really see it next time there is a major El Nino. 1997 produced a plethora of massive hurricanes (Linda for one) in the Eastern Pacific and Western Pacific (Ivan, Joan, etc.). I think there were 10! cat 5s that year (or was it super typhoons (high end cat 4s) and at least 4 monsters under 880mb.

Of course, one claim against global warming impacting hurricanes is the very quiet EPAC. Last time the EPAC had a decent year was 2002, with Kenna, Elida and Hernan being marignal Cat 5s and Fausto being an extremely long lasting and wide travelling Cat 4.

They usually make it deep into the alphabet but haven't in recent years.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 67 guests