Theo's AstroMet 2006 Hurricane & Tropical Storm Forecast

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29114
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

#41 Postby vbhoutex » Sun Apr 30, 2006 1:13 am

If this thread is to continue on the site the petty sniping back and forth needs to stop. Discuss the topic at hand only or it will be pulled.
0 likes   

Theo

#42 Postby Theo » Sun Apr 30, 2006 2:18 am

DoctorHurricane2003 wrote:Oh with Jim Hughes...hm. I do agree that very long range sunspot cycles can probably help to influence global warming/cooling...as I believe they found some research evidence on that.

Day-to-day weather I'm still a bit iffy on.


Well, J. H. Nelson did a lot of work with RCA on sunspots and planetary positions on short-wave transmissions that are famous in astrometeorology. I was 12 years old when I read his book called Cosmic Patterns. Published 1974 by the American Federation of Astrologers, Nelson's book higlighted one of the most controversial questions in the field of solar system science ~ Do planets play a part in the development and behavior of sunspots, and magnetic storms?

Nelson spent almost 30 years doing detailed research in the field and produced very strong evidence that the planets do cause changes in the particular solar radiations associated with magnetic storms in the atmosphere of the earth.

Employed to study sunspots by RCA Communications, once the largest short-wave radio communication organization in the world, Nelson thought sunspots were the cause of magnetic storms that disrupted short-wave communications. The short-wave radio industry needed a reliable magnetic storm forecasting service so advance preparations could be made for these periodic disruptions.

By pre-acting, steps could be taken by communications engineers to alleviate the effects of the magnetic storms on the short-wave radio circuits and for this reason a reliable forecasting service for the industry was needed. Nelson's planetary alignment work was successful and its usefulness both to astronomers and users of these forecasts were very valuable. Opposition from conventional scientists dropped to negligible after a few years of seeing the facts of planetary and solar transits on communications come true.

It was during the observation of sunspots that Nelson became convinced that, besides their activity, other forces acting upon the sun also affected magnetic weather conditions upon the earth's surface. This conviction led him into research involving the exact position of planets in relation to their positions to the Sun, and Earth's transits.

For instance, by plotting the course of the planets of the solar system on a daily basis Nelson found that:

- When two or more planets are at right angles to each other, or in line on the same side of the sun - or in line with the sun between them - magnetic disturbances occur more frequently on the earth's surface.

- The most disturbed 12 month period will precede and follow the positions of Jupiter & Saturn, in certain configurations to the Sun and relative to the Earth.

- That the most severe disturbances happen when Mars, Venus, Mercury and the Earth are in critical relationship near points of Jupiter-Saturn configurations.

- When Jupiter and Saturn have moved away from their critical relationship, there is a correlating decline in severity of magnetic weather, although storms of shorter duration result from the critical combinations of smaller planets.

- The least disturbed periods occur when Saturn, Jupiter and Mars are equally spaced by what astrologers call a trine aspect, or 120 degrees.

Nelson's work received worldwide acclaim. He later became president of RCA.
0 likes   

Theo

#43 Postby Theo » Sun Apr 30, 2006 2:37 am

SouthFloridawx wrote:
Mark the dates above as key dates for hurricane and tropical storm watches. Lunar maximum declinations north for the Gulf coast, Carribean Sea, and Atlantic Ocean reveal a high potential for tropical storms, and hurricanes this season.


Theo thanks and I will be saving this to a word file to see how well this forecast was.


You're welcome. I hope that I am wrong because what I see of these coming transits, I don't like. We all know that we are seeing more powerful storms, they seem to be increasing in strength, and intensity. The Lunar declinations will, though, arrive on time - they always do - and with the warming waters, and my worries about the gulf stream, I found that the coasts of Florida, Georgia, South & North Carolina, as well as states above the Mason-Dixon line - all the way past New Jersey and into the parts of the Northeast are subject to tropical activity this year.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7393
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

#44 Postby Hurricaneman » Mon May 01, 2006 12:16 am

Thank you for your outlook
0 likes   

User avatar
luvwinter
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 7:05 am
Location: Dayton, Ohio

#45 Postby luvwinter » Mon May 01, 2006 5:56 am

Hey Theo,

Glad to see you made it to this forum. As you know I always enjoy reading your forecasts. Your input puts a different spin on things, always interesting. You have made many great predictions that have come to fruition. keep up the good work.

Luvwinter
0 likes   

rockyman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1967
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 12:24 pm
Location: Dauphin Island, AL

#46 Postby rockyman » Mon May 01, 2006 6:31 am

Hey, ya'll..thanks for the laugh this morning! My newspaper got soaked overnight by the rainstorm here...and my horoscope was illegible...this was a nice substitute. :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
terstorm1012
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1314
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:36 pm
Location: Millersburg, PA

#47 Postby terstorm1012 » Mon May 01, 2006 8:18 am

Theo.....this was really cool. I'm also going to save it as a word file and link it up with my Outlook Calender.

You've hit on some things that are really interesting and should be studied more.

do you have an email list?
0 likes   

User avatar
Cookiely
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3211
Age: 74
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 7:31 am
Location: Tampa, Florida

#48 Postby Cookiely » Mon May 01, 2006 3:51 pm

Theo thank you for the information and forgive our members who aren't very open minded about other's view point. Keep us updated.
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

#49 Postby MiamiensisWx » Mon May 01, 2006 3:58 pm

I agree. I think your information, Theo, is rather interesting, mostly that on the moon's influence.
0 likes   

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5907
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

#50 Postby MGC » Mon May 01, 2006 4:44 pm

I don't buy into the moon controlling weather here on Earth. If the moon did control the weather than said weather would be as predictable as the rise and fall of the tides which the moon does influence. Astrology is pure hog wash IMO, but you can believe what you like.....MGC
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

#51 Postby MiamiensisWx » Mon May 01, 2006 4:48 pm

MGC wrote:If the moon did control the weather than said weather would be as predictable as the rise and fall of the tides which the moon does influence.


That's because there are other climatological factors and solar weather factors that come into play. Nothing is ever simple, but that doesn't mean that Theo's point on the moon is incorrect.

MGC wrote:Astrology is pure hog wash IMO, but you can believe what you like.....MGC


For the record, I don't agree on Theo's planetary alignment influence part of his/her theory. However, I agree with Theo's point on the moon's influence. That's all.
0 likes   

Theo

#52 Postby Theo » Mon May 01, 2006 5:09 pm

luvwinter wrote:Hey Theo,

Glad to see you made it to this forum. As you know I always enjoy reading your forecasts. Your input puts a different spin on things, always interesting. You have made many great predictions that have come to fruition. keep up the good work.

Luvwinter


Thanks LuvWinter.
0 likes   

Theo

#53 Postby Theo » Mon May 01, 2006 5:12 pm

MGC wrote:I don't buy into the moon controlling weather here on Earth. If the moon did control the weather than said weather would be as predictable as the rise and fall of the tides which the moon does influence. Astrology is pure hog wash IMO, but you can believe what you like.....MGC


You must mean pop-culture astrology, which is hogwash. As for the Moon and its direct influence on Earthly weather, well, that Moon is not up there for entertainment purposes, and I suggest you observe it and your local weather over the months ahead to see just how strong a role it plays with other celestial bodies on the Earth's weather.
0 likes   

Theo

#54 Postby Theo » Mon May 01, 2006 5:13 pm

Cookiely wrote:Theo thank you for the information and forgive our members who aren't very open minded about other's view point. Keep us updated.


You're welcome Cookiely. Like your avatar by the way.
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

#55 Postby MiamiensisWx » Mon May 01, 2006 5:13 pm

Theo wrote:You must mean pop-culture astrology, which is hogwash. As for the Moon and its direct influence on Earthly weather, well, that Moon is not up there for entertainment purposes, and I suggest you observe it and your local weather over the months ahead to see just how strong a role it plays with other celestial bodies on the Earth's weather.


Good response, Theo. I agree with your points on the moon's influence. I think it is like the influence of solar weather on climatological conditions.
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#56 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Mon May 01, 2006 5:17 pm

Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:A few quastions for theo

What is your number of tropical cyclones...Meaning tropical storms,hurricanes,major hurricanes.

2# When do you expect the next cyclone to form on earth?

3# When will the next powerful cyclone form on earth?

4# When do you expect the next 9 point earth quake?

5# When doy you expect that big earth quake to hit the Portland area?

Lets see if you can get these. If you can they there will be no quastion you will earn alot of respect.



Please Answer my quastions theo. I hope your not mad at me :cry:
0 likes   

Theo

#57 Postby Theo » Mon May 01, 2006 5:49 pm

CapeVerdeWave wrote:I agree. I think your information, Theo, is rather interesting, mostly that on the moon's influence.


The Moon is a part of the solar system, as is the Earth, Sun, and planets. Everything is inter-connected, not seperate.
0 likes   

Theo

#58 Postby Theo » Mon May 01, 2006 5:51 pm

terstorm1012 wrote:Theo.....this was really cool. I'm also going to save it as a word file and link it up with my Outlook Calender.

You've hit on some things that are really interesting and should be studied more.

do you have an email list?


Thanks. The more you study astrometeorology, the more observant you will be in forecasting long-range weather conditions.
0 likes   

quandary
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 362
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 4:04 pm

#59 Postby quandary » Mon May 01, 2006 6:15 pm

This definitely needs a disclaimer. It is the opinion of an individual who I has little or no experience in meteorology. Please adhere ot the rules even the ones that were put out last year regarding posts.

Any moderator have an opinion on this (posting the S2K disclaimer for something as left field as this).
0 likes   

Theo

#60 Postby Theo » Mon May 01, 2006 7:08 pm

quandary wrote:This definitely needs a disclaimer. It is the opinion of an individual who I has little or no experience in meteorology. Please adhere ot the rules even the ones that were put out last year regarding posts.

Any moderator have an opinion on this (posting the S2K disclaimer for something as left field as this).


You must mean "informed" opinion. I am an expert on space weather, and astrometeorology. If you have an opinion on astrometeorology, please make sure that it is informed. Moreover, S2K rules are being adhered to, and just because you may "disagree" with my methodologies, it does not mean you have a right to demand a disclaimer based on your lack of knowledge of astrometeorology - which is centuries old, and pre-dates conventional meteorology by many centuries, while giving birth to meteorology itself.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AnnularCane, Google [Bot], hurricane2025, kevin and 37 guests