91L Invest,Comments,Sat Pics,Models Thread #3

JamesFromMaine2 · #21 Postby **JamesFromMaine2** » Mon May 01, 2006 12:46 pm

Camille_2_Katrina wrote:i will always remember 91L... not for what she did... rather for
what she could have done! and so so early in the 2006 season.

Ok look there was NO Invest! The NHC just wanted to test the equipment before the start of the season so they could make sure everything was in working condition before the first REAL Invest came! This never had a chance to develop the water was to cold where it was and the wind shear was to strong and increasing! You will know when we get our first real invest believe me!

https://www.youtube.com/user/senorpepr · #22 Postby **senorpepr** » Mon May 01, 2006 12:47 pm

Camille_2_Katrina wrote:quote" Fare thee well 91L. We shall remember you fondly when the August and September giants come around. "

i will always remember 91L... not for what she did... rather for
what she could have done! and so so early in the 2006 season.

You mean nothing, right?

stormtruth · #23 Postby **stormtruth** » Mon May 01, 2006 12:48 pm

We will never forget 91L! :ggreen:

Camille_2_Katrina · #24 Postby **Camille_2_Katrina** » Mon May 01, 2006 12:50 pm

just greatfull she didn't get drug into the gulf with the warmer water temps
and hook up with that gale we had here in south mississippi this past weekend.
we need a break here... a LONG break.

stormtruth · #25 Postby **stormtruth** » Mon May 01, 2006 12:53 pm

Camille_2_Katrina wrote:just greatfull she didn't get drug into the gulf with the warmer water temps
and hook up with that gale we had here in south mississippi this past weekend.
we need a break here... a LONG break.

If a storm heads that way this Summer there should be plenty of advance warning.

#26 Postby **skysummit** » Mon May 01, 2006 12:53 pm

This is just getting stupid now. There was NOTHING that would've come in the gulf. I don't know why I keep responding to this...all we're doing is feeding the troll now.

Camille_2_Katrina · #27 Postby **Camille_2_Katrina** » Mon May 01, 2006 12:58 pm

stormtruth wrote:
Camille_2_Katrina wrote:just greatfull she didn't get drug into the gulf with the warmer water temps
and hook up with that gale we had here in south mississippi this past weekend.
we need a break here... a LONG break.

If a storm heads that way this Summer there should be plenty of advance warning.

i hope it doesn't come to that. This site looks like a great reference place.
some of the people are a little mean. But most of you are GREAT!

we can all help each other here.

Ivan14 · #28 Postby **Ivan14** » Mon May 01, 2006 1:53 pm

Bye Bye 91L.

CHRISTY · #29 Postby **CHRISTY** » Mon May 01, 2006 2:04 pm

Camille_2_Katrina · #30 Postby **Camille_2_Katrina** » Mon May 01, 2006 2:05 pm

it stayed a fish the whole time!

Tampa Bay Hurricane · #31 Postby **Tampa Bay Hurricane** » Mon May 01, 2006 2:11 pm

Though it was obviously a test...it was a winter-storm gale...with gusty winds....nothing tropical of course...but nevertheless an interesting feature

#32 Postby **brunota2003** » Mon May 01, 2006 2:15 pm

Even though it was only a test...I must say: Bye 91L and good riddends...though you never caused any harm, nor ever would as a tropical system...I must say you caused quite a panic when there was nothing to panic about in the first place... :roll:

Camille_2_Katrina · #33 Postby **Camille_2_Katrina** » Mon May 01, 2006 2:17 pm

only a test? where are you getting that from?

we must take the NHC seriously. They are the
authoriteis.

#34 Postby **brunota2003** » Mon May 01, 2006 2:19 pm

Camille_2_Katrina wrote:only a test? where are you getting that from?

uh...the forecasters here have been stating that since thread #1...it is only a TEST by the NHC/NRL...

Camille_2_Katrina · #35 Postby **Camille_2_Katrina** » Mon May 01, 2006 2:20 pm

Did NHC/NRL say this was a test?

#36 Postby **brunota2003** » Mon May 01, 2006 2:21 pm

Camille_2_Katrina wrote:Did NHC/NRL say this was a test?

There never WAS a chance. The only reason this was even an invest was this was a test for the NHC and the NRL's microwave products (the NRL said so). It's not even a blip on the screen as far as concern for development...

It NEVER was.

You guys are going to be certifiable the first time we actually have something to watch that might actually have the chance to develop. I've never seen so much discussion over a cold front on a tropical board.

from AFM in thread #2...

#37 Postby **skysummit** » Mon May 01, 2006 2:21 pm

Camille_2_Katrina wrote:Did NHC/NRL say this was a test?

Please stop. It was never anything....just stop.

wxwatcher91 · #38 Postby **wxwatcher91** » Mon May 01, 2006 2:26 pm

Camille_2_Katrina wrote:Did NHC/NRL say this was a test?

it was a test. The mets have been saying it was a test for the past three days.

Camille_2_Katrina · #39 Postby **Camille_2_Katrina** » Mon May 01, 2006 2:29 pm

that's wierd....
:eek:

#40 Postby **bvigal** » Mon May 01, 2006 2:29 pm

Yes, NHC did. As has been stated, it was written in this thread by a meteorologist (weather expert) who spoke to someone at the NRL. Perhaps you should read the whole thread (including part 1 and 2) before commenting. Or, are you trolling?

I'm not saying you are, but... when there's a blue puddle of ink on the floor and someone comes along and calls it red, after 20 times people, including color experts, have said "no, it's blue", but that person continues to insist it is red, how do you expect people to react? That is exactly what a troll does. It's not a matter of differences of opinion, but common knowledge.

If some here seem rude, it's because they are frustrated at using their time and effort to explain to you, over and over again. They really are nice people. :cheesy:

91L Invest,Comments,Sat Pics,Models Thread #3

Who is online