TD One advisory email

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Audrey2Katrina
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4252
Age: 76
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:39 pm
Location: Metaire, La.

#21 Postby Audrey2Katrina » Sat Apr 29, 2006 10:49 am

SouthFloridawx wrote:
Ivan14 wrote:That's crazy that some guy in New Orleans reported it as the real thing. That would scare anybody that's in the New Orleans area.


Oh good lord. Figures people wouldn't call someone to verify it. They could even call thier local tv weather people and ask them. Or even call noaa to see. That is plain old ignorance...
I have a feeling everything is going to get blown out of proportion this year and hurricane season will be held up to a spotlight and examined every which way. :roll:


I sincerely hope this derision/scorn is aimed at the Radio Announcer and the station, both of which should have done their homework/research, but didn't and chose to blast this report all over the airwaves and not the uncountable tens of thousands who might have simply heard it, and had no other option than for a few harrowing moments to think another storm might be headed their way. Many of my students commute across Lake Pontchartrain every day because their homes are still not livable, hence this "hoax" or whatever it is was read just as they were leaving school. For anywhere from a 30 min to 1 hour drive they were probably going back and forth about what to do. It's kind of hard to call local tv weather people, much less noaa, while operating a vehicle in open traffic. Sure you could bring up the cell option for those who had them (and many do not)... still an unnecessary aire of concern and fear would prevail until more could be found out meanwhile the other voice over the radio was lending credence to the report, and BTW--nobody READ the date of the report over the airwaves as I heard it. Switching channels around did little to no good as during those times most of them are in the midst of either syndicated long-winded talk-shows, or their 20 straight minutes (etc.) of uninterrupted music. Besides, you'd had to have heard how it was reported....sort of a "this just in" sort of thing--like "we got it before anyone else" something of a scoop on everyone else...additionally it was "only" expected to be a tropical storm and threaten no land before Tuesday. Frankly, I think it is reprehensible, and grossly irresponsible, and the ones folks should be outraged at are the incompetents who aired it--not the victims of nature's fury in this area who happened to hear it. I was one of the lucky ones, living within 5 minutes of my work I wasted no time to check sat images, S2K, AND NOAA, seeing something was definitely amiss and telling all I could who had heard it not to worry, clearly they had made a big mistake--later acknowledged. But, you know, we actually still have people living in sections of our erstwhile "city" who live in tents propped up in front of their property, no electricity (hence local tv news/weather/) and certainly no internet. But a lot of them do have transistor-type radios to keep in touch with something of the outside world.

Look, I can see having a sense of disdain/scorn for people who, upon hearing this AND having ready access to check it out simply chose, instead to REact and spread panic--yes, those would be almost as irresponsible as the announcers who propagated the rumor (almost) ; but bear in mind a lot of folks around here are still dealing with PTSD and the last thing they needed to hear was some announcer, over what was considered THE most informative source throughout all this mess, come on and inform them of an impending storm possibly heading our way--not after all they'd already been through. The scorn, if aimed at anyone but the announcer and radio station--is seriously misdirected.

A2K
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8346
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

#22 Postby SouthFloridawx » Sat Apr 29, 2006 11:37 am

Audrey2Katrina wrote:
SouthFloridawx wrote:
Ivan14 wrote:That's crazy that some guy in New Orleans reported it as the real thing. That would scare anybody that's in the New Orleans area.


Oh good lord. Figures people wouldn't call someone to verify it. They could even call thier local tv weather people and ask them. Or even call noaa to see. That is plain old ignorance...
I have a feeling everything is going to get blown out of proportion this year and hurricane season will be held up to a spotlight and examined every which way. :roll:


I sincerely hope this derision/scorn is aimed at the Radio Announcer and the station, both of which should have done their homework/research, but didn't and chose to blast this report all over the airwaves and not the uncountable tens of thousands who might have simply heard it, and had no other option than for a few harrowing moments to think another storm might be headed their way. Many of my students commute across Lake Pontchartrain every day because their homes are still not livable, hence this "hoax" or whatever it is was read just as they were leaving school. For anywhere from a 30 min to 1 hour drive they were probably going back and forth about what to do. It's kind of hard to call local tv weather people, much less noaa, while operating a vehicle in open traffic. Sure you could bring up the cell option for those who had them (and many do not)... still an unnecessary aire of concern and fear would prevail until more could be found out meanwhile the other voice over the radio was lending credence to the report, and BTW--nobody READ the date of the report over the airwaves as I heard it. Switching channels around did little to no good as during those times most of them are in the midst of either syndicated long-winded talk-shows, or their 20 straight minutes (etc.) of uninterrupted music. Besides, you'd had to have heard how it was reported....sort of a "this just in" sort of thing--like "we got it before anyone else" something of a scoop on everyone else...additionally it was "only" expected to be a tropical storm and threaten no land before Tuesday. Frankly, I think it is reprehensible, and grossly irresponsible, and the ones folks should be outraged at are the incompetents who aired it--not the victims of nature's fury in this area who happened to hear it. I was one of the lucky ones, living within 5 minutes of my work I wasted no time to check sat images, S2K, AND NOAA, seeing something was definitely amiss and telling all I could who had heard it not to worry, clearly they had made a big mistake--later acknowledged. But, you know, we actually still have people living in sections of our erstwhile "city" who live in tents propped up in front of their property, no electricity (hence local tv news/weather/) and certainly no internet. But a lot of them do have transistor-type radios to keep in touch with something of the outside world.

Look, I can see having a sense of disdain/scorn for people who, upon hearing this AND having ready access to check it out simply chose, instead to REact and spread panic--yes, those would be almost as irresponsible as the announcers who propagated the rumor (almost) ; but bear in mind a lot of folks around here are still dealing with PTSD and the last thing they needed to hear was some announcer, over what was considered THE most informative source throughout all this mess, come on and inform them of an impending storm possibly heading our way--not after all they'd already been through. The scorn, if aimed at anyone but the announcer and radio station--is seriously misdirected.

A2K


wow... that comment was certainly not aimed at the people/residents of new orleans. This comment was aimed at the annoucer(s) that aired the information. The radio station should have called tv stations/noaa to verifty the email as it could have caused mass panic. I can not begin to imagine what the residents and people who were affected in the north central gulf coast. Again I repeat this was not aimed at the residents of new orleans or the surrounding area.

I am modifying my previous statment so there is no more confusion.

Oh good lord. Figures THE RADIO STATION! wouldn't call someone to verify it. They could even call thier local tv weather people and ask them. Or even call noaa to see. That is plain old ignorance...
I have a feeling everything is going to get blown out of proportion this year and hurricane season will be held up to a spotlight and examined every which way. :roll:
0 likes   

User avatar
Audrey2Katrina
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4252
Age: 76
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:39 pm
Location: Metaire, La.

#23 Postby Audrey2Katrina » Sat Apr 29, 2006 2:18 pm

I am modifying my previous statment so there is no more confusion.


Thanks :) I was just concerned that some folks might want to blame the hearers instead of the announcers. You're 100% right! This radio station, certainly had the resources to have checked this out thoroughly before they aired it across the tri-state area. Kind of like yelling "Fire" in a closed theater, while people are watching something akin to the Towering Inferno.

Once again, thanks for the clarification.

A2K
0 likes   
Flossy 56 Audrey 57 Hilda 64* Betsy 65* Camille 69* Edith 71 Carmen 74 Bob 79 Danny 85 Elena 85 Juan 85 Florence 88 Andrew 92*, Opal 95, Danny 97, Georges 98*, Isidore 02, Lili 02, Ivan 04, Cindy 05*, Dennis 05, Katrina 05*, Gustav 08*, Isaac 12*, Nate 17, Barry 19, Cristobal 20, Marco, 20, Sally, 20, Zeta 20*, Claudette 21 IDA* 21 Francine *24

User avatar
crabbyhermit
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 60
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 8:58 pm
Location: New Orleans uptown, da sliva by da riva

#24 Postby crabbyhermit » Sat Apr 29, 2006 2:52 pm

I listened to WWL radio part of the afternoon friday, but obviously not when this thing was announced. For what it's worth, I think Tommy Tucker was filling in for Garland, so my man Garland didn't screw up, at least.

Surprised to hear about this major snafu.
0 likes   

User avatar
Audrey2Katrina
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4252
Age: 76
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:39 pm
Location: Metaire, La.

#25 Postby Audrey2Katrina » Sat Apr 29, 2006 3:26 pm

crabbyhermit wrote:I listened to WWL radio part of the afternoon friday, but obviously not when this thing was announced. For what it's worth, I think Tommy Tucker was filling in for Garland, so my man Garland didn't screw up, at least.

Surprised to hear about this major snafu.


You're absolutely right, I'd have recognized Garland's voice, and feel he'd have had it looked into much more thoroughly before giving it any credibility.

A2K
0 likes   
Flossy 56 Audrey 57 Hilda 64* Betsy 65* Camille 69* Edith 71 Carmen 74 Bob 79 Danny 85 Elena 85 Juan 85 Florence 88 Andrew 92*, Opal 95, Danny 97, Georges 98*, Isidore 02, Lili 02, Ivan 04, Cindy 05*, Dennis 05, Katrina 05*, Gustav 08*, Isaac 12*, Nate 17, Barry 19, Cristobal 20, Marco, 20, Sally, 20, Zeta 20*, Claudette 21 IDA* 21 Francine *24


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Tak5 and 64 guests