No way!!

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#41 Postby senorpepr » Wed Apr 26, 2006 10:25 pm

Scorpion wrote:
DoctorHurricane2003 wrote:lol JTWC is the worst in the area, but hey, whatever floats your inaccurate boat


I would rather use a US based organization that doesn't use an odd way of measuring a cyclone's intensity based on gusts and kilometers per hour.


Oh jeez. With all due respect, someone needs to toss you into a snowbank. This is, by far, the silliest post I've seen in the past month ... and there are some CRAZY things posted in this forum...

I can't believe you would rather use an organization with limited experience (JTWC... and I say that because a majority of their forecasters only have a couple of years experience in tropical forecasting at best) over professionals (BoM). That is like going to Greatone for your hurricane forecasts... :roll:

(Not comparing JTWC to Greatone, of course...)
0 likes   

Rod Hagen
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 237
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 6:22 am
Location: Lives in Melbourne, works in N Queensland

#42 Postby Rod Hagen » Thu Apr 27, 2006 7:13 am

AussieMark wrote:
Scorpion wrote:I would rather use a US based organization that doesn't use an odd way of measuring a cyclone's intensity based on gusts and kilometers per hour.


why would we care tho since kmh is the measurement that is used here.

Imagine the confusion if BOM decided to use mph on the advisories the average person would not know what to expect since kmh is what is used here in Australia.

converting is not difficult anyway

1 kt = 1.15 mph
1 mph = 1.6 kmh

its what I have done for years with tracking Atlantic Hurricanes and talking to u guys converting my terminology into US terminology ;)


I'm rather intrigued that when it comes to things like windspeeds ANYONE uses anything other than kph ( or, perhaps, metres per second) . Sure, we've only had kph as the standard in mainstream Australia since the mid 1970's but the metric system has been the standard international system for scientific matters since 1875.

Heck, the US Congress adopted it as the official US system "except when the use of these units would obviously impair communication or reduce the usefulness of a report" way back in 1901!

104 years is enough time for at least those in the US with an interest in scientific matters like meteorology to get in line with the rest of the world and their own legislature, I reckon!

You can even take it back further. Thomas Jefferson attempted to introduce a variant of the metric system in 1789. In 1866 the international metric system was legally permitted in the US and in 1875 the US became one of the founding signatories of the treaty that established the International System of Units.

I notice that in prominent US scientific publications International units are almost invariably used. Just the amateurs who are reluctant to change, I guess. If the authorities are worried about people not understanding the metric system in warning broadcasts then surely they could just publish both figures for a while (as we did here when I was in my early twenties).

In fact, maybe members on a board like this could help to "lead the way", by standardising on the metric system when discussing such things.

Cheers

Rod
0 likes   

User avatar
joseph01
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 6:08 pm
Location: gainesville, florida

#43 Postby joseph01 » Thu Apr 27, 2006 8:00 am

senorpepr wrote:(Not comparing JTWC to Greatone, of course...)


I was absent from this forum apparently, when this "Greatone" was here. I have seen many references to him/her in posts, and am curious about this episode.

It would be nice if someone would write a very brief synopsis of that story, so I could understand the lasting memory. Obviously, for whatever reason, he was a memorable figure.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#44 Postby senorpepr » Thu Apr 27, 2006 9:19 am

joseph01 wrote:
senorpepr wrote:(Not comparing JTWC to Greatone, of course...)


I was absent from this forum apparently, when this "Greatone" was here. I have seen many references to him/her in posts, and am curious about this episode.

It would be nice if someone would write a very brief synopsis of that story, so I could understand the lasting memory. Obviously, for whatever reason, he was a memorable figure.


I'm able ready to step out, so I can't share the whole story, but it wasn't just one episode. Greatone has been with us, unfortunately, for many years--following a majority of us from other message boards.
0 likes   

Dustin
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 140
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 12:12 pm
Contact:

#45 Postby Dustin » Fri Apr 28, 2006 5:14 pm

Don't get to worried. We will all make it through these hard times.
0 likes   

User avatar
benny
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 593
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 8:09 am
Location: Miami

#46 Postby benny » Sat Apr 29, 2006 12:15 am

Rod Hagen wrote:
AussieMark wrote:
Scorpion wrote:I would rather use a US based organization that doesn't use an odd way of measuring a cyclone's intensity based on gusts and kilometers per hour.


why would we care tho since kmh is the measurement that is used here.

Imagine the confusion if BOM decided to use mph on the advisories the average person would not know what to expect since kmh is what is used here in Australia.

converting is not difficult anyway

1 kt = 1.15 mph
1 mph = 1.6 kmh

its what I have done for years with tracking Atlantic Hurricanes and talking to u guys converting my terminology into US terminology ;)


I'm rather intrigued that when it comes to things like windspeeds ANYONE uses anything other than kph ( or, perhaps, metres per second) . Sure, we've only had kph as the standard in mainstream Australia since the mid 1970's but the metric system has been the standard international system for scientific matters since 1875.

Heck, the US Congress adopted it as the official US system "except when the use of these units would obviously impair communication or reduce the usefulness of a report" way back in 1901!

104 years is enough time for at least those in the US with an interest in scientific matters like meteorology to get in line with the rest of the world and their own legislature, I reckon!

You can even take it back further. Thomas Jefferson attempted to introduce a variant of the metric system in 1789. In 1866 the international metric system was legally permitted in the US and in 1875 the US became one of the founding signatories of the treaty that established the International System of Units.

I notice that in prominent US scientific publications International units are almost invariably used. Just the amateurs who are reluctant to change, I guess. If the authorities are worried about people not understanding the metric system in warning broadcasts then surely they could just publish both figures for a while (as we did here when I was in my early twenties).

In fact, maybe members on a board like this could help to "lead the way", by standardising on the metric system when discussing such things.

Cheers

Rod


There is no push to metricize the US anymore. knots and miles per hour are all you are going to get! I would be shocked if it changed in my lifetime..
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#47 Postby wxmann_91 » Sat Apr 29, 2006 12:19 am

Why are we arguing about units? Different countries/cultures, different viewpoints on the same thing. Geez.
0 likes   

HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

#48 Postby HurricaneBill » Sat Apr 29, 2006 12:54 am

The U.S. uses the metric system in the medical field.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivan14
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 184
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 10:49 am
Contact:

#49 Postby Ivan14 » Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:02 am

For me knots and MPH are easier to understand the KPH.
0 likes   

User avatar
jimvb
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 397
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 8:03 am
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Contact:

They all measure the same thing

#50 Postby jimvb » Sun Apr 30, 2006 7:52 am

To me all three are equally easy to understand. kph, mph, and knots all measure wind speed. To me there is nothing in mph to recommend it. One mph is 5280 fph, which to me is not intuitive - there is nothing natural about the number 5280 and nothing to relate it to distance. Knots do have something going for them; a knot-hour (also known as a nautical mile) is a minute of the earth's surface. So 60 knots is a degree an hour. That's helpful for counting hours across a map ticked off in degrees. Kph is easy to deal with because there are no other units such as feet. There are only meters; kilometers, megameters, millimeters and so forth all are decimal parts of a meter. However, there is nothing significant about the length of a meter, except that it may have been 1/40millionth of the earth's surface. Better units, in my opinion, are feet and kilofeet (one foot = one light nanosecond) and nautical miles.
0 likes   

User avatar
Recurve
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1640
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:59 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

#51 Postby Recurve » Sun Apr 30, 2006 10:44 am

A "knot hour"? That seems to be a contradictory unit, since a knot is one nautical mile per hour. A knot-hour, if there is such a thing, is certainly not "also known as a nautical mile."
A knot is not a distance measurement. A nautical mile is, and it's equal to one minute of arc, but only in latitude. For longitude (east-west distances), a nautical mile is one minute of arc only at the equator. As you go north or south, lines of longitude converge, and east-west minutes of arc get smaller and smaller. If you stand one foot from the north pole, a minute of arc east-west is a fraction of an inch.

There is something familiar about mph for most Americans because it's what cars use. You want to feel a 60 mph wind, get on the expressway and roll down the window.
MPH, feet and inches, miles, and degrees farenheit are so common here that it's hard to imagine changing in my lifetime. I'm aware of other units, of course, but I can't comprehend the temperature on a nice day being 25 degrees (or whatever 75 F is in centigrade).
0 likes   

DoctorHurricane2003

#52 Postby DoctorHurricane2003 » Sun Apr 30, 2006 10:51 am

hrm...a knot-hour would just simply be a nautical mile, and a knot per hour would be an acceleration.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Hurricaneman and 68 guests