TSR Febuary outlook for the 2006 season=16/9/4

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 146224
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

TSR Febuary outlook for the 2006 season=16/9/4

#1 Postby cycloneye » Mon Feb 06, 2006 11:21 am

http://tsr.mssl.ucl.ac.uk/

As always the Tropical Storm Risk folks do great outlooks and this one is no exception.Any comments are welcomed about their forecast which calls for another active season although not as active as the 2005 one.

To view the Tropical Storm Risk outlook you have to have acrobat reader.If you dont have it here is the place to download it.

:darrow: :darrow: :darrow: :darrow: :darrow: :darrow: :darrow: :darrow: :darrow: :darrow:

http://www.download.com/3000-2378-10000062.html
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

Javlin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1621
Age: 64
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 7:58 pm
Location: ms gulf coast

#2 Postby Javlin » Mon Feb 06, 2006 12:37 pm

So they still think a GOM activity is a possibility well have to see how the future reports evolve.
0 likes   

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#3 Postby JonathanBelles » Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:10 pm

it really help if i knew what ace numbers were
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Gulf of Gavin Newsom

#4 Postby Steve » Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:39 pm

>>it really help if i knew what ace numbers were

Accumulated Cyclone Energy or the potential of energy compared to normal seasons. Go to Google and check it out at the NOAA site or whatever.

Steve
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Gulf of Gavin Newsom

#5 Postby Steve » Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:52 pm

Also, prior to 2005, nearly everyone would be shaking his or her head at a respectable site calling for 16/9/4. That would be on the extreme end of most predictions had we not seen first-hand what could happen in a season coming off one of the worst landfalling seasons of most of our lifetimes (2004). But until we've got an EL Nino solution (and the clock is ticking on that anyway), expect a lot of people to come out with named storms in the teens.

Steve
0 likes   

User avatar
P.K.
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 5149
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Watford, England
Contact:

#6 Postby P.K. » Mon Feb 06, 2006 7:20 pm

fact789 wrote:it really help if i knew what ace numbers were


The wind speed in kts every 6 hours (3am, 9am, 3pm, 9pm GMT) squared when it is 35kts or greater.
Last edited by P.K. on Mon Feb 06, 2006 8:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5907
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

#7 Postby MGC » Mon Feb 06, 2006 7:20 pm

Well, after the past 2005 season, 16/9/4 sound on the quiet side. I just hope they all stay at sea. Sure does look like another active season ahead of us.....MGC
0 likes   

Jim Cantore

#8 Postby Jim Cantore » Mon Feb 06, 2006 7:31 pm

I had 17/9/5

with la nina now I have

19/11/6 with 2 cat 5's
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9490
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

#9 Postby ROCK » Mon Feb 06, 2006 8:26 pm

Hurricane Floyd wrote:I had 17/9/5

with la nina now I have

19/11/6 with 2 cat 5's



sounds about right...I'm still sticking with 17/9/4..not sure La Nina will be around throughout the season.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23022
Age: 68
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#10 Postby wxman57 » Mon Feb 06, 2006 8:59 pm

Hurricane Floyd wrote:I had 17/9/5

with la nina now I have

19/11/6 with 2 cat 5's


Just because there's a La Nina doesn't necessarily mean that a season will have twice as many named storms as normal (19 vs. 9.6). Many other factors came into play in 2005 to produce the 27 named storms. The presence of what looked like a monsoonal trof in the central to NW Caribbean combined with unusually low wind shear in the Caribbean Sea and Gulf were two of the main factors. La Nina would likely have significantly less impact than those two. Questsion is, will the same trof and shear patterns redevelop in 2006? I think it's unlikely, at least climatology says so. Cooling temps in the Pacific could also mean a stronger Bermuda high in 2006 and beyond, and that could erase the very low shear in the Caribbean Sea. With La Nina, the shear may be a little lower than in a "normal" season, but it may be higher than last year.

That said, my initial thoughts before I heard a presentation by TSR were about 16 named storms, 9 hurricanes, and 4 major hurricanes. Quite a bit higher than normal, but significantly lower than last year.
0 likes   

Margie

#11 Postby Margie » Thu Feb 09, 2006 11:59 am

My numbers are 15/8/3 (from Dec 2). I don't have forecasting experience so I used climatology from similar years. The only change I will make is for any storms arriving before the "official" season starts.

It's weird to have those numbers and apparently be the conservative one.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#12 Postby KWT » Thu Feb 09, 2006 12:46 pm

So another season with a high ACE and high totals??

I know that the ACE forecast is only very rough estimate but that forecast would put at the 8th most active ever, saying that its abit of a come-down compared to the last 2 seasons ACE totals :eek:
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: riapal and 76 guests