Doomsday storms

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Jim Cantore

Doomsday storms

#1 Postby Jim Cantore » Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:12 am

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Ixolib
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2741
Age: 68
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 8:55 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

#2 Postby Ixolib » Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:39 am

Those depictions do, in fact, present some very scary scenarios for each of the fictional landfalls!! I guess it's a good thing we're not in "season" right now or some folks might be getting freaked out about right now!!
0 likes   

User avatar
Hybridstorm_November2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2813
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: SW New Brunswick, Canada
Contact:

RE:

#3 Postby Hybridstorm_November2001 » Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:45 am

Only problem I see for track 4 is that storms tend to be "flying" up here. Bob for example was a cat 2 when it made landfall and it was still a 60 mph TS when the center was over my area later that day. Any typical storm hitting NYC as cat 5 would still be a cat 3 at the cat 1 position you show, or if it hit as a cat 4 would still be a cat 2; simply because it wouldn't have enough time to weaken that much at a forward speed of about 40 mph, or even higher.


PS: Other wise fantastic work :D
0 likes   

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#4 Postby JonathanBelles » Wed Jan 18, 2006 2:18 pm

some of those look like katrina and rita
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7393
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

#5 Postby Hurricaneman » Wed Jan 18, 2006 3:18 pm

IMO scenerio 4 seems quite unlikely if impossible
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#6 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Jan 18, 2006 3:33 pm

scenario 2 and 3 happened (track wise) in 1947 and 1985
0 likes   

User avatar
hicksta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1108
Age: 35
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:16 am
Location: Kemah Texas/ Baton Rogue LA

#7 Postby hicksta » Wed Jan 18, 2006 5:37 pm

Strength wise your off alot, no way a cane can hold cay 5 into New York or for a long time.
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

#8 Postby MiamiensisWx » Wed Jan 18, 2006 6:29 pm

This would truly be a nasty - yet realistic - storm for New York City (as well as New England and the Mid-Atlantic area)...

Image

The storm is 650 miles wide at landfall and makes landfall in Newark, New Jersey, with 125MPH sustained winds at landfall. At it's peak intensity, the storm is a Category Five with 165MPH winds at two periods when it is north of Puerto Rico and the islands of the Caribbean and when it is east of the Bahamas.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hybridstorm_November2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2813
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: SW New Brunswick, Canada
Contact:

RE:

#9 Postby Hybridstorm_November2001 » Wed Jan 18, 2006 6:46 pm

Your numbers are a bit off. No way a 125 mph, 650 mile wide storm could go down to a TD in the time you showed. Check out the below storm.


Image


It made landfall at NYC as a 85 mph cat one at point 38 on the map, it still had winds of 60 mph at point 41 on the map (as it lefted Northern Maine in other words). As I stated before storms tend to travel at an average of about 40 mph up here. There is little chance it couldn't make the trip across New England in less than 12 hours tops.
0 likes   

Jim Cantore

Re: RE:

#10 Postby Jim Cantore » Wed Jan 18, 2006 6:47 pm

Hybridstorm_November2001 wrote:Only problem I see for track 4 is that storms tend to be "flying" up here. Bob for example was a cat 2 when it made landfall and it was still a 60 mph TS when the center was over my area later that day. Any typical storm hitting NYC as cat 5 would still be a cat 3 at the cat 1 position you show, or if it hit as a cat 4 would still be a cat 2; simply because it wouldn't have enough time to weaken that much at a forward speed of about 40 mph, or even higher.


PS: Other wise fantastic work :D


I figured by that time It would be rapidly becoming extratropical
0 likes   

Jim Cantore

#11 Postby Jim Cantore » Wed Jan 18, 2006 6:48 pm

Hurricaneman wrote:IMO scenerio 4 seems quite unlikely if impossible


I screwed that one up a bit
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

#12 Postby MiamiensisWx » Wed Jan 18, 2006 6:48 pm

Oh... thanks for telling me on that, Hybridstorm_November2001. I think a made a mistake by winding down the intensity after landfall too quickly. Other than that, is it fairly realistic?
0 likes   

User avatar
Hybridstorm_November2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2813
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: SW New Brunswick, Canada
Contact:

#13 Postby Hybridstorm_November2001 » Wed Jan 18, 2006 6:58 pm

Yup. Sorry if I came across as a bit of an ass LOL. Just I'm helping to do a study on this very subject right now (New England and Maritimes hurricanes). We have found thus far that they tend to loss roughly 40 mph of their sustained wind speed by the time one has crossed most of the region if it makes landfall say around Long Island/Cape Code area, and is moving at the usual high speed.
0 likes   

Jim Cantore

#14 Postby Jim Cantore » Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:00 pm

heres 3 more (a bit more realistic)

Image

Image

Image
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#15 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:02 pm

I don't think a cat5 could move at 40 or more mph. It would form its own shear.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hybridstorm_November2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2813
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: SW New Brunswick, Canada
Contact:

#16 Postby Hybridstorm_November2001 » Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:08 pm

I tend to agree. I also doubt one could get up to NYC/Long Island and still be a 5 at landfall, but this is the Weather Channel’s idea not mine :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
Hybridstorm_November2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2813
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: SW New Brunswick, Canada
Contact:

#17 Postby Hybridstorm_November2001 » Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:11 pm

Map looks a lot better. In theory anyhow. Like I said I still think a cat. 5 in that area could not happen, though who can say for sure :?:
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#18 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:13 pm

A cat5 moving at 40 mph wind shear its self apart. Remember the cape verde systems that move 20 mph westward.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hybridstorm_November2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2813
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: SW New Brunswick, Canada
Contact:

#19 Postby Hybridstorm_November2001 » Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:21 pm

Yup. For awhile Bertha in 1996 was moving to fast to really strengthen. It didn't take off until it reached the Bahamas, and slowed down. Still in these cases the storms tend to be mere embryos. Once a storm gets large and established. I do not think fast motion will harm it that much. Especially if it is moving in the same direction as the Upper level flow regime. Look at the great New England Hurricane, Hurricane Carol, and Hurricanes Edna and Gerda. All were still monsters when they got up here, and all were racing to the finish line as they say.
0 likes   

Jim Cantore

#20 Postby Jim Cantore » Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:26 pm

If you note in the NYC storm it struggles early on due to that

then it slows and bombs
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: StormWeather, TomballEd, WaveBreaking and 76 guests