An Increase in Late and Early Storms in the North Atlantic

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
milankovitch
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 243
Age: 40
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 11:30 pm
Location: Menands, NY; SUNY Albany
Contact:

An Increase in Late and Early Storms in the North Atlantic

#1 Postby milankovitch » Tue Jan 10, 2006 10:15 pm


Has there been an increase in late-season tropical storm activity?

Hurricane experts agree that global warming has not led to an increase in the number of tropical cyclones occurring world-wide, and are currently debating whether or not global warming has affected tropical cyclone intensity (more on this later in January, I've been pulling together a lot of material). Is global warming possibly affecting the length of hurricane season, as well? It seems that an inordinate number of late-season and off-season tropical storms have been forming in the Atlantic the past few years. For example, two December storms formed in 2003, which also had the first-ever April storm, Tropical Storm Ana. Cuba's worst hurricane ever, Hurricane Michelle, hit in November 2001, and the Atlantic's second deadliest hurricane of all time, Hurricane Mitch, lasted into November 1998. Add to this 2005's Greek cousins, Gamma, Delta, Epsilon, and Zeta, which all occurred in November and December. To see if hurricane season is indeed lasting longer, I plotted up the number of days a named storm existed each year from November through April (Figure 1). The data cut-off is 1944--the beginning of reliable hurricane records in the Atlantic, thanks to regular long-range aircraft reconnaissance missions. According to Dr. Chris Landsea's paper, A Climatology of Intense Atlantic Hurricanes, only a very few short-lived tropical storms that formed far out over the open Atlantic were missed by these aircraft missions or ships plying the shipping lanes between Europe and North America. For example, all of 2005's Greek storms were long-lived enough and sufficiently intense that they would have been detected back in the 1944-1960 time frame. Beginning 1960, weather satellites gave us full coverage of all the ocean areas, and it is unlikely we missed any tropical storms after then. Thus, Figure 1 is likely to be an accurate measure of the late-season tropical storm activity for the Atlantic.


Figure 1.Number of days a named tropical storm was present in the Atlantic for each year during November through April, 1944-2005. The 2.5 named tropical storm days from the March 2004 hurricane in the South Atlantic that hit Brazil--Hurricane Catarina--are not included.

Image


Looking at Figure 1, we see a noticeable increase in the number of late-season named-storm days in the Atlantic in the past decade, roughly coinciding with the upswing in Atlantic intense hurricane activity that began in 1995. This increase in late-season tropical cyclone activity was not observed during the previous warm phase of theAtlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO), the natural cycle that greatly influences hurricane activity in the Atlantic. This previous warm phase of the AMO lasted from 1926-1969. Thus, it seems unlikely that the recent upswing in late-season Atlantic tropical storm activity is due to the AMO. Is global warming to blame, then? Global sea surface temperatures in the tropics have increased by .3 degrees C (.5 degrees F) the past century, so it is reasonable to ask if this increase has lengthened hurricane season.

To answer this question, we look at the November though April number of tropical storm days for the Northern Hemisphere's other ocean basins that have tropical cyclones--the Western Pacific (Figure 2) and the Eastern Pacific (Figure 3). Neither ocean basin shows any increase in the length of their hurricane seasons, so global warming has not caused a Northern Hemisphere-wide increase in the length of hurricane seasons. If global warming is to blame for the recent increase in Atlantic late season and off-season tropical storm activity, it is probably through some as yet not understood mechanism, and not directly due to increased the sea surface temperatures over the Atlantic.

Image

Figure 2. Number of days a named tropical storm was present in the Northern Hemisphere's Western Pacific Ocean for each year during November through April, 1945-2005.

Image

Figure 3. Number of days a named tropical storm was present in the Northern Hemisphere's Eastern Pacific Ocean (off the coast of Mexico) for each year during November through April, 1949-2005

Jeff Masters

http://www.weatherunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/show.htm



I found this article particularly interesting anyone have any thoughts on an increase in late-season activity in the North Atlantic?
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23022
Age: 68
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#2 Postby wxman57 » Tue Jan 10, 2006 10:20 pm

One could argue that the increased use in satellite in the detection of such systems could be a prime reason for the apparent increase in the number of late season storms, as many of them tend to form well out to sea. It may also be a function of the NHC now naming systems that are not fully tropical.
0 likes   

User avatar
milankovitch
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 243
Age: 40
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 11:30 pm
Location: Menands, NY; SUNY Albany
Contact:

#3 Postby milankovitch » Tue Jan 10, 2006 10:51 pm

Certainly a valid argument although it does say in the article...

"According to Dr. Chris Landsea's paper, A Climatology of Intense Atlantic Hurricanes, only a very few short-lived tropical storms that formed far out over the open Atlantic were missed by these aircraft missions or ships plying the shipping lanes between Europe and North America. For example, all of 2005's Greek storms were long-lived enough and sufficiently intense that they would have been detected back in the 1944-1960 time frame'

How would the West Pacific data be explained using that arguement? I certainly admit that there are inaccuracies when you go that far back but the trend in the North Atlantic appears to large to me to be detection and recording.
0 likes   

MWatkins
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 7:51 pm
Location: SE Florida
Contact:

#4 Postby MWatkins » Wed Jan 11, 2006 12:48 am

Couple of quick thoughts:

1. The late season analysis shows a very clear trend. However...it fails to explain why...in general during the last several seasons (2005 excluded) we have seen very quiet Octobers...especially in terms of US landfalls.

In the scenario mentioned in the article...I would think that the trend would show up throughout the season rather than halt in Oct...a generally favorable month...then pick up again in Nov/Dec.

2. Hard to argue against the idea that most of this late/out of season stuff would have not been detected.

In general...I'm not going to go against Dr Masters or Dr Landsea...those guys are the best in terms of analysis and knowledge. I'm most curious about the quiet Octobers we've seen in the last several seasons...other than of course 2005.

MW
0 likes   
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23022
Age: 68
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#5 Postby wxman57 » Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:56 am

milankovitch wrote:Certainly a valid argument although it does say in the article...

"According to Dr. Chris Landsea's paper, A Climatology of Intense Atlantic Hurricanes, only a very few short-lived tropical storms that formed far out over the open Atlantic were missed by these aircraft missions or ships plying the shipping lanes between Europe and North America. For example, all of 2005's Greek storms were long-lived enough and sufficiently intense that they would have been detected back in the 1944-1960 time frame'

How would the West Pacific data be explained using that arguement? I certainly admit that there are inaccuracies when you go that far back but the trend in the North Atlantic appears to large to me to be detection and recording.


I don't know, without satellite, they MAY have been detected as low centers back in 1944-1960, but would they have been identified as warm core and then named without any direct observations? Just knowing that there was a low producing wind and swell doesn't make it a tropical storm, particularly pre and post-season. How would they have determined the presence of a warm-core tropical cyclone back then without satellite?
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: HurakaYoshi and 76 guests