1992 Andrew report update

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Derek Ortt

1992 Andrew report update

#1 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Jan 06, 2006 2:32 pm

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1992andrew.html

a new update has just been amde to this report

One thing of interest (besides the cat 5)... look how much it, like Katrina weakened just ebfore landfall in the northern GOM. Weakened from 120KT to 100KT in just 2.5 hours. This is a research topic that probably should be addressed to determine why this region causes so much rapid weakening
0 likes   

User avatar
terstorm1012
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1314
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:36 pm
Location: Millersburg, PA

#2 Postby terstorm1012 » Fri Jan 06, 2006 2:54 pm

that unofficial minimum pressure is right near where I spent many a summer at an aunts house! (yes I cheated and looked a map.)

thanks for bringing this to my attn.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#3 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Jan 06, 2006 3:50 pm

forgot to mention this in the previous post

The weakening in the nrothern Gulf should have been made as clear as was the initial upgrade to a cat 5. This is a very important process that occurrs in this part of the basin and further documents the difficulties of having anything above a category 3 make landfall here (and some "cat 4's" may need to be re-examined as well)
0 likes   

User avatar
Aslkahuna
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4550
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ
Contact:

#4 Postby Aslkahuna » Fri Jan 06, 2006 3:51 pm

Probably related to why storms tend to weaken before landfalling in Mainland China (and to a lesser extent Taiwan and Luzon).

Steve
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#5 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Jan 06, 2006 4:03 pm

I did not know that storms tended to weaken before landfall in mainland China, Taiwan, or Juzon. What parameters cause the weakening there? Is the total heat content as low there as it is in the northern Gulf?
0 likes   

Scorpion

#6 Postby Scorpion » Fri Jan 06, 2006 4:06 pm

Dry air, much lower heat content, cooler waters. I expect each and every landfalling major GOM hurricane to be a Cat 3, and no higher from now on.
0 likes   

Rainband

#7 Postby Rainband » Fri Jan 06, 2006 4:13 pm

Derek. I am curious why so much research is being done on the supposed weakening and catagory strength after the fact. What is the purpose of this. It doesn't change the damage done, wether it be a 2,3,4 or 5. Is it for building codes or evacuation zones?? Thanks in advance for your response.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#8 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Jan 06, 2006 4:18 pm

Rainband,

those would be 2 of the reasons as to why there is a push to determine the precise category. Not so much for the past, but to improve the historical record so that we will know in the future what to expect. We now know that for the GOM, a moderate category 3 will bring about damage previously thought to have been possible only in a category 4 or 5 (Ivan, Katrina, and Rita)

Based upon recent hurricanes, it is safe to say that if we can protect the northern GOM from a category 3 hurricane, that region will be safe. Had the New Orleans levees actually been designed to withstand a real cat 3 storm surge (not the 9-12 feet south florida/puuedo 3 indicated in the unofficial addition to the SS Scale), we would not have had the tragedy of New orleans
0 likes   

Rainband

#9 Postby Rainband » Fri Jan 06, 2006 4:39 pm

Thanks derek. I was also thinking if it had something to do with "heat content" is there anyway to adjust that parameter to weaken storms as they get closer to shore?? I guess if there was that would have been attempted some time ago. Thanks again.
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#10 Postby brunota2003 » Fri Jan 06, 2006 4:50 pm

Ok, I know its January, but this time of year always shows the cooler spots the best...look at the gulf of mexico here along the coast:
Image
Since this is January, of course the temps are cooler, I just thought maybe it has to do with the currents keeping the warmer water from the coast, as shown here...
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#11 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Jan 06, 2006 4:52 pm

dont think its the currents as just a few inches below the surface of the northern GOM, it is always cold. it is only the initial surface layer that is warm

there has not been any heat content of the northern GOM studies yet, as coupled modeling is still a very new process
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#12 Postby brunota2003 » Fri Jan 06, 2006 4:58 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:dont think its the currents as just a few inches below the surface of the northern GOM, it is always cold. it is only the initial surface layer that is warm

there has not been any heat content of the northern GOM studies yet, as coupled modeling is still a very new process
ah, but the currents are keeping all that warm water from reaching those areas, thus causing the gom there to have cold water only a few inches down...right?
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#13 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Jan 06, 2006 5:01 pm

the loop current remains well offshore of the northern GOM.

Maybe there is a return cold current near the coast. Something for me to look at (find an old map from physical oceanography class)
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#14 Postby brunota2003 » Fri Jan 06, 2006 5:03 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:the loop current remains well offshore of the northern GOM.

Maybe there is a return cold current near the coast. Something for me to look at (find an old map from physical oceanography class)
what about the rivers? the water comes from the mountains, right? so wouldnt those be chilly...and, the cold water has to sink somewhere...
0 likes   

User avatar
DESTRUCTION5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4423
Age: 43
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
Location: Stuart, FL

#15 Postby DESTRUCTION5 » Fri Jan 06, 2006 5:20 pm

This is all awesome and relavent info...But im trying to figure out who had time to do this update from 1992 with the season we had this year..LOL
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#16 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Jan 06, 2006 5:25 pm

the deputy director, who did the initial Andrew report. he doesn't write any of the seasonal reports anymore

Of interest as well, Andrew is one of the few TC's to have made landfall twice as a cat 5
0 likes   

User avatar
DESTRUCTION5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4423
Age: 43
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
Location: Stuart, FL

#17 Postby DESTRUCTION5 » Fri Jan 06, 2006 5:34 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:the deputy director, who did the initial Andrew report. he doesn't write any of the seasonal reports anymore

Of interest as well, Andrew is one of the few TC's to have made landfall twice as a cat 5


Homestead and?
0 likes   

User avatar
Normandy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2293
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 12:31 am
Location: Houston, TX

#18 Postby Normandy » Fri Jan 06, 2006 5:40 pm

I think its the Florida Coast and the Bahamas (maybe twice in the bahamas i dont know).

Also, it didnt make "landfall" at Homestead, because Homestead isnt on the coast. I think it made landfall on elliot key or cutler ridge.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#19 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Jan 06, 2006 5:43 pm

eleuthra island (140KT) and FL (145KT)
0 likes   

User avatar
DESTRUCTION5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4423
Age: 43
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
Location: Stuart, FL

#20 Postby DESTRUCTION5 » Fri Jan 06, 2006 5:46 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:eleuthra island (140KT) and FL (145KT)


Thanks...
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 65 guests