1992 Andrew report update
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
1992 Andrew report update
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1992andrew.html
a new update has just been amde to this report
One thing of interest (besides the cat 5)... look how much it, like Katrina weakened just ebfore landfall in the northern GOM. Weakened from 120KT to 100KT in just 2.5 hours. This is a research topic that probably should be addressed to determine why this region causes so much rapid weakening
a new update has just been amde to this report
One thing of interest (besides the cat 5)... look how much it, like Katrina weakened just ebfore landfall in the northern GOM. Weakened from 120KT to 100KT in just 2.5 hours. This is a research topic that probably should be addressed to determine why this region causes so much rapid weakening
0 likes
- terstorm1012
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1314
- Age: 43
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:36 pm
- Location: Millersburg, PA
forgot to mention this in the previous post
The weakening in the nrothern Gulf should have been made as clear as was the initial upgrade to a cat 5. This is a very important process that occurrs in this part of the basin and further documents the difficulties of having anything above a category 3 make landfall here (and some "cat 4's" may need to be re-examined as well)
The weakening in the nrothern Gulf should have been made as clear as was the initial upgrade to a cat 5. This is a very important process that occurrs in this part of the basin and further documents the difficulties of having anything above a category 3 make landfall here (and some "cat 4's" may need to be re-examined as well)
0 likes
Derek. I am curious why so much research is being done on the supposed weakening and catagory strength after the fact. What is the purpose of this. It doesn't change the damage done, wether it be a 2,3,4 or 5. Is it for building codes or evacuation zones?? Thanks in advance for your response.
0 likes
Rainband,
those would be 2 of the reasons as to why there is a push to determine the precise category. Not so much for the past, but to improve the historical record so that we will know in the future what to expect. We now know that for the GOM, a moderate category 3 will bring about damage previously thought to have been possible only in a category 4 or 5 (Ivan, Katrina, and Rita)
Based upon recent hurricanes, it is safe to say that if we can protect the northern GOM from a category 3 hurricane, that region will be safe. Had the New Orleans levees actually been designed to withstand a real cat 3 storm surge (not the 9-12 feet south florida/puuedo 3 indicated in the unofficial addition to the SS Scale), we would not have had the tragedy of New orleans
those would be 2 of the reasons as to why there is a push to determine the precise category. Not so much for the past, but to improve the historical record so that we will know in the future what to expect. We now know that for the GOM, a moderate category 3 will bring about damage previously thought to have been possible only in a category 4 or 5 (Ivan, Katrina, and Rita)
Based upon recent hurricanes, it is safe to say that if we can protect the northern GOM from a category 3 hurricane, that region will be safe. Had the New Orleans levees actually been designed to withstand a real cat 3 storm surge (not the 9-12 feet south florida/puuedo 3 indicated in the unofficial addition to the SS Scale), we would not have had the tragedy of New orleans
0 likes
- brunota2003
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 9476
- Age: 34
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
- Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
- Contact:
Ok, I know its January, but this time of year always shows the cooler spots the best...look at the gulf of mexico here along the coast:
Since this is January, of course the temps are cooler, I just thought maybe it has to do with the currents keeping the warmer water from the coast, as shown here...

Since this is January, of course the temps are cooler, I just thought maybe it has to do with the currents keeping the warmer water from the coast, as shown here...
0 likes
- brunota2003
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 9476
- Age: 34
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
- Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
- Contact:
ah, but the currents are keeping all that warm water from reaching those areas, thus causing the gom there to have cold water only a few inches down...right?Derek Ortt wrote:dont think its the currents as just a few inches below the surface of the northern GOM, it is always cold. it is only the initial surface layer that is warm
there has not been any heat content of the northern GOM studies yet, as coupled modeling is still a very new process
0 likes
- brunota2003
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 9476
- Age: 34
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
- Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
- Contact:
what about the rivers? the water comes from the mountains, right? so wouldnt those be chilly...and, the cold water has to sink somewhere...Derek Ortt wrote:the loop current remains well offshore of the northern GOM.
Maybe there is a return cold current near the coast. Something for me to look at (find an old map from physical oceanography class)
0 likes
- DESTRUCTION5
- Category 5
- Posts: 4423
- Age: 43
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
- Location: Stuart, FL
- DESTRUCTION5
- Category 5
- Posts: 4423
- Age: 43
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
- Location: Stuart, FL
- DESTRUCTION5
- Category 5
- Posts: 4423
- Age: 43
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
- Location: Stuart, FL
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 67 guests