WxGuy1 wrote:Just as a note, models and NHC haven't performed as well with cyclones that have originated in the manner that Zeta has (e.g. NOT from a classic west-ward moving tropical wave, etc). For whatever reason (I'd surmise it has a lot to do with the thermodynamic environment typical of upper-troughs turned tropical cyclone), these systems tend to persist longer than one would otherwise think -- look at Vince, Delta and Epsilon... It certainly doesn't help that there are huge data collection issues in the central Atlantic, so you can't expect models to perform too well.
I'm going to reiterate this comment I made a couple of days ago... We've seen this in the past (namely, with Vince and Epsilon), and we're seeing it again with Zeta... Storms that develop from an upper-level low or trough tend to be able to persist / maintain intensity in the face of cool water and relatively strong shear. Unfortunately, a storm's dissipation can occur very quickly in such an environment (again, as we saw with Epsilon, which fell apart very rapidly), making the forecast even more difficult. I think NHC and model forecasts for a storm like Zeta should be taken with a little less confidence than normal. I'm not dogging the NHC, as they're the best there are, but we just don't have a good grasp on intensity forecasts for these, more rare storms... Just an observation...