Hurricane modification?

#101 Postby **cycloneye** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:00 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
cyclonekiller wrote: Actually, I'd like to show you the email but they won't let me here. I don't lie.

You can PM it to me...I'm sure the mods will not have a problem with that.

But you can give me the name on the board. There is not an issue with that. We talk about the names of NHC staff all the time. Give me the name.

And stop giving incomplete answers. Give a total cost estimate of the project and how you arrive at 10B. Give total weights. Lengths. Labor. All of it. Give me how you came up with the number of tubes needed to take the temp down.

No problem that you PM Air Force Met with your Email or a name at NHC that AFM is asking for.

cyclonekiller · #102 Postby **cyclonekiller** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:01 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
cyclonekiller wrote: Actually, I'd like to show you the email but they won't let me here. I don't lie.

You can PM it to me...I'm sure the mods will not have a problem with that.

But you can give me the name on the board. There is not an issue with that. We talk about the names of NHC staff all the time. Give me the name.

And stop giving incomplete answers. Give a total cost estimate of the project and how you arrive at 10B. Give total weights. Lengths. Labor. All of it. Give me how you came up with the number of tubes needed to take the temp down.

Just give me your email I want to respect the mods wishes.

#103 Postby **Air Force Met** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:02 pm

cyclonekiller wrote:Air Force Met
What is your email I'll send you a copy of it.

You can PM it to me. Copy and paste. Type the name on this thread.

#104 Postby **Air Force Met** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:03 pm

cyclonekiller wrote:

Just give me your email I want to respect the mods wishes.

Well...the mods just said no problem PMing it...so PM it.

cyclonekiller · #105 Postby **cyclonekiller** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:03 pm

cycloneye wrote:
Air Force Met wrote:
cyclonekiller wrote: Actually, I'd like to show you the email but they won't let me here. I don't lie.

You can PM it to me...I'm sure the mods will not have a problem with that.

But you can give me the name on the board. There is not an issue with that. We talk about the names of NHC staff all the time. Give me the name.

And stop giving incomplete answers. Give a total cost estimate of the project and how you arrive at 10B. Give total weights. Lengths. Labor. All of it. Give me how you came up with the number of tubes needed to take the temp down.

No problem that you PM Air Force Met with your Email or a name at NHC that AFM is asking for.

Are you a moderator?

#106 Postby **Air Force Met** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:03 pm

cyclonekiller wrote:
Are you a moderator?

Do you NOT see the title "Moderator" next to his name?

cyclonekiller · #107 Postby **cyclonekiller** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:05 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
cyclonekiller wrote:
Are you a moderator?

Do you NOT see the title "Moderator" next to his name?

Ok hold on a second I'll PM you

cyclonekiller · #108 Postby **cyclonekiller** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:15 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
cyclonekiller wrote:
Are you a moderator?

Do you NOT see the title "Moderator" next to his name?

Did you get it?

#109 Postby **Air Force Met** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:16 pm

cyclonekiller wrote:
Air Force Met wrote:
cyclonekiller wrote:
Are you a moderator?

Do you NOT see the title "Moderator" next to his name?

Did you get it?

Uhhh. No.

#110 Postby **Air Force Met** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:19 pm

While I wait...I wish to ask how you propose to suspend, each tube, which if made of lightweight aluminum will weigh 74 million lbs, hundreds (depending on the location) if not thousands of feet off the ocean floor?

cyclonekiller · #111 Postby **cyclonekiller** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:20 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
cyclonekiller wrote:
Air Force Met wrote:
cyclonekiller wrote:
Are you a moderator?

Do you NOT see the title "Moderator" next to his name?

Did you get it?

Uhhh. No.

OK lets try again.

DoctorHurricane2003 · #112 Postby **DoctorHurricane2003** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:20 pm

Choices of next response:

A. Well, I sent it, something must be wrong.
B. Oops, I deleted it by mistake! It was there though, I'm not lying.
C. Here, I'll send it again. *cough cough*

EDIT: posted at same time, and it's C! Surprise!

cyclonekiller · #113 Postby **cyclonekiller** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:24 pm

DoctorHurricane2003 wrote:Choices of next response:

A. Well, I sent it, something must be wrong.
B. Oops, I deleted it by mistake! It was there though, I'm not lying.
C. Here, I'll send it again. *cough cough*

EDIT: posted at same time, and it's C! Surprise!

It should be under Swoops as they called them.

cyclonekiller · #114 Postby **cyclonekiller** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:26 pm

Air Force Met wrote:While I wait...I wish to ask how you propose to suspend, each tube, which if made of lightweight aluminum will weigh 74 million lbs, hundreds (depending on the location) if not thousands of feet off the ocean floor?

How about now did you get it?

Actually the tunnels would basically support themselfs since they can be designed to be neutrally bouyant. All you have to do is anchor them so as to not float away.

DoctorHurricane2003 · #115 Postby **DoctorHurricane2003** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:27 pm

I thought you talked to them though?

Hmmmm...

cyclonekiller · #116 Postby **cyclonekiller** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:29 pm

DoctorHurricane2003 wrote:I thought you talked to them though?

Hmmmm...

Let it play out what are you afraid of?

Matt-hurricanewatcher · #117 Postby **Matt-hurricanewatcher** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:32 pm

Cyclone, how do you plan to take this to the senate so it can be approved? Then on to the Presidents desk.

Why because your going to need Man power/Money to get it done. In you better have some really good facts to back you case when you get to the senate floor.

#118 Postby **Air Force Met** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:35 pm

cyclonekiller wrote:
How about now did you get it?

Yeah...and I hate to tell ya...but that sounds like an email you send someone when you don't want to hurt their feelings. I will give it to Derek Ortt. I'm sure it can get Frank Mark's first hand account of it.

But...you also said "I already did all that homework you metion above with direct communication with the hurricane center years ago."

The email YOU provided was dated October 22, 2005. Who did you talk to in the NHC (not the HRD...of which Franks Mark's is a part) years ago? Give me a name so I can verify NHC contact "years ago."

cyclonekiller · #119 Postby **cyclonekiller** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:38 pm

Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:Cyclone, how do you plan to take this to the senate so it can be approved? Then on to the Presidents desk.

Why because your going to need Man power/Money to get it done. In you better have some really good facts to back you case when you get to the senate floor.

Well it is just an Idea at this phase. I don't have all the engineering facts yet just some principles to go by with a lot of variables. If thoughtfully engineered my guess it should work.

cyclonekiller · #120 Postby **cyclonekiller** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:43 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
cyclonekiller wrote:
How about now did you get it?

Yeah...and I hate to tell ya...but that sounds like an email you send someone when you don't want to hurt their feelings. I will give it to Derek Ortt. I'm sure it can get Frank Mark's first hand account of it.

But...you also said "I already did all that homework you metion above with direct communication with the hurricane center years ago."

The email YOU provided was dated October 22, 2005. Who did you talk to in the NHC (not the HRD...of which Franks Mark's is a part) years ago? Give me a name so I can verify NHC contact "years ago."

Look on the bottom Hugh Willoughby. Not going to hurt my feelings one bit
The principles work.

Hurricane modification?

Who is online