Your Favorite Hurricane Pair (Devastation Included!)

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K

Favorite Pair of Hurricanes (Devastation Included!)

Katrina - Wilma
11
22%
Katrina - Andrew
9
18%
Katrina - Camille
14
27%
Katrina - Mitch
4
8%
Mitch - Gilbert
0
No votes
Mitch - Labor Day Hurricane
1
2%
Floyd - Gilbert
1
2%
Isabel - Katrina
2
4%
Andrew - Labor Day Hurricane
3
6%
Andrew - Camille
1
2%
Other - Please Specify
5
10%
 
Total votes: 51

Message
Author
Anonymous

#21 Postby Anonymous » Thu Nov 10, 2005 3:20 pm

southerngale wrote:While I don't have a favorite hurricane pair, I'm surprised that Rita isn't up there at all, while other hurricanes that weren't as intense, in winds and pressure are there. hmmm, odd


Rita is considered the childs play storm compared to Katrina/Wilma. Rita's damage, while Cat 3-ish is nothing like the extreme Cat 4 damage of Wilma in the Yucatan, and the catastrophic Cat 5 damage of Katrina in LA/MA
0 likes   

User avatar
sunny
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7031
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 2:11 pm
Location: New Orleans

#22 Postby sunny » Thu Nov 10, 2005 3:22 pm

~Floydbuster wrote:
southerngale wrote:While I don't have a favorite hurricane pair, I'm surprised that Rita isn't up there at all, while other hurricanes that weren't as intense, in winds and pressure are there. hmmm, odd


Rita is considered the childs play storm compared to Katrina/Wilma. Rita's damage, while Cat 3-ish is nothing like the extreme Cat 4 damage of Wilma in the Yucatan, and the catastrophic Cat 5 damage of Katrina in LA/MA


I think the people sitting over in Western LA and Eastern TX would disagree with you on Rita being "childs play".
Last edited by sunny on Thu Nov 10, 2005 3:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

CajunMama
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 10791
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:57 pm
Location: 30.22N, 92.05W Lafayette, LA

#23 Postby CajunMama » Thu Nov 10, 2005 3:55 pm

~Floydbuster wrote:
southerngale wrote:While I don't have a favorite hurricane pair, I'm surprised that Rita isn't up there at all, while other hurricanes that weren't as intense, in winds and pressure are there. hmmm, odd


Rita is considered the childs play storm compared to Katrina/Wilma. Rita's damage, while Cat 3-ish is nothing like the extreme Cat 4 damage of Wilma in the Yucatan, and the catastrophic Cat 5 damage of Katrina in LA/MA


What??????? Coastal towns wiped out....storm surge in parts of LA that had never seen storm surge....coastal wetlands wiped out...

Just because it was in an area not as populated it's considered "childs play"?
0 likes   

Anonymous

#24 Postby Anonymous » Thu Nov 10, 2005 3:58 pm

CajunMama wrote:
~Floydbuster wrote:
southerngale wrote:While I don't have a favorite hurricane pair, I'm surprised that Rita isn't up there at all, while other hurricanes that weren't as intense, in winds and pressure are there. hmmm, odd


Rita is considered the childs play storm compared to Katrina/Wilma. Rita's damage, while Cat 3-ish is nothing like the extreme Cat 4 damage of Wilma in the Yucatan, and the catastrophic Cat 5 damage of Katrina in LA/MA


What??????? Coastal towns wiped out....storm surge in parts of LA that had never seen storm surge....coastal wetlands wiped out...

Just because it was in an area not as populated it's considered "childs play"?


No, but it is overshadowed. Rita was a weakening Cat 3 coming onshore, with a 12-15 foot surge, unlike the 30-35 foot surge in Katrina.
0 likes   

User avatar
sunny
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7031
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 2:11 pm
Location: New Orleans

#25 Postby sunny » Thu Nov 10, 2005 3:59 pm

~Floydbuster wrote:
CajunMama wrote:
~Floydbuster wrote:
southerngale wrote:While I don't have a favorite hurricane pair, I'm surprised that Rita isn't up there at all, while other hurricanes that weren't as intense, in winds and pressure are there. hmmm, odd


Rita is considered the childs play storm compared to Katrina/Wilma. Rita's damage, while Cat 3-ish is nothing like the extreme Cat 4 damage of Wilma in the Yucatan, and the catastrophic Cat 5 damage of Katrina in LA/MA


What??????? Coastal towns wiped out....storm surge in parts of LA that had never seen storm surge....coastal wetlands wiped out...

Just because it was in an area not as populated it's considered "childs play"?


No, but it is overshadowed. Rita was a weakening Cat 3 coming onshore, with a 12-15 foot surge, unlike the 30-35 foot surge in Katrina.


Try living through a "minor" cane and then tell me about it being child's play.
0 likes   

Anonymous

#26 Postby Anonymous » Thu Nov 10, 2005 4:07 pm

sunny wrote:
~Floydbuster wrote:
CajunMama wrote:
~Floydbuster wrote:
southerngale wrote:While I don't have a favorite hurricane pair, I'm surprised that Rita isn't up there at all, while other hurricanes that weren't as intense, in winds and pressure are there. hmmm, odd


Rita is considered the childs play storm compared to Katrina/Wilma. Rita's damage, while Cat 3-ish is nothing like the extreme Cat 4 damage of Wilma in the Yucatan, and the catastrophic Cat 5 damage of Katrina in LA/MA


What??????? Coastal towns wiped out....storm surge in parts of LA that had never seen storm surge....coastal wetlands wiped out...

Just because it was in an area not as populated it's considered "childs play"?


No, but it is overshadowed. Rita was a weakening Cat 3 coming onshore, with a 12-15 foot surge, unlike the 30-35 foot surge in Katrina.


Try living through a "minor" cane and then tell me about it being child's play.


Um...compared to Katrina, yea it was. Rita killed 6 people, Katrina killed 1,300 or so. Rita caused 8 billion dollars damage....KATRINA IS OVER 100 BILLION. Rita wiped out a few coastal towns, while Katrina wiped out an entire state coastline. Rita was a very destructive hurricane, but when it comes to history, Katrina will dwarf Rita bigtime.
0 likes   

User avatar
sunny
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7031
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 2:11 pm
Location: New Orleans

#27 Postby sunny » Thu Nov 10, 2005 4:08 pm

~Floydbuster wrote:
sunny wrote:
~Floydbuster wrote:
CajunMama wrote:
~Floydbuster wrote:
southerngale wrote:While I don't have a favorite hurricane pair, I'm surprised that Rita isn't up there at all, while other hurricanes that weren't as intense, in winds and pressure are there. hmmm, odd


Rita is considered the childs play storm compared to Katrina/Wilma. Rita's damage, while Cat 3-ish is nothing like the extreme Cat 4 damage of Wilma in the Yucatan, and the catastrophic Cat 5 damage of Katrina in LA/MA


What??????? Coastal towns wiped out....storm surge in parts of LA that had never seen storm surge....coastal wetlands wiped out...

Just because it was in an area not as populated it's considered "childs play"?


No, but it is overshadowed. Rita was a weakening Cat 3 coming onshore, with a 12-15 foot surge, unlike the 30-35 foot surge in Katrina.


Try living through a "minor" cane and then tell me about it being child's play.


Um...compared to Katrina, yea it was. Rita killed 6 people, Katrina killed 1,300 or so. Rita caused 8 billion dollars damage....KATRINA IS OVER 100 BILLION. Rita wiped out a few coastal towns, while Katrina wiped out an entire state coastline. Rita was a very destructive hurricane, but when it comes to history, Katrina will dwarf Rita bigtime.


I am aware of what Katrina did - I live in New Orleans. But when your life is shattered, regardless of strength or storm surge height, it is major. Trust me.
0 likes   

Anonymous

#28 Postby Anonymous » Thu Nov 10, 2005 4:11 pm

sunny wrote:
~Floydbuster wrote:
sunny wrote:
~Floydbuster wrote:
CajunMama wrote:
~Floydbuster wrote:
southerngale wrote:While I don't have a favorite hurricane pair, I'm surprised that Rita isn't up there at all, while other hurricanes that weren't as intense, in winds and pressure are there. hmmm, odd


Rita is considered the childs play storm compared to Katrina/Wilma. Rita's damage, while Cat 3-ish is nothing like the extreme Cat 4 damage of Wilma in the Yucatan, and the catastrophic Cat 5 damage of Katrina in LA/MA


What??????? Coastal towns wiped out....storm surge in parts of LA that had never seen storm surge....coastal wetlands wiped out...

Just because it was in an area not as populated it's considered "childs play"?


No, but it is overshadowed. Rita was a weakening Cat 3 coming onshore, with a 12-15 foot surge, unlike the 30-35 foot surge in Katrina.


Try living through a "minor" cane and then tell me about it being child's play.


Um...compared to Katrina, yea it was. Rita killed 6 people, Katrina killed 1,300 or so. Rita caused 8 billion dollars damage....KATRINA IS OVER 100 BILLION. Rita wiped out a few coastal towns, while Katrina wiped out an entire state coastline. Rita was a very destructive hurricane, but when it comes to history, Katrina will dwarf Rita bigtime.


I am aware of what Katrina did - I live in New Orleans. But when your life is shattered, regardless of strength or storm surge height, it is major. Trust me.


I never said it wasnt. But, in the general scale of hurricanes, Hurricane Rita was just about on the scale of Hurricane Ivan.
0 likes   

User avatar
sunny
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7031
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 2:11 pm
Location: New Orleans

#29 Postby sunny » Thu Nov 10, 2005 4:13 pm

~Floydbuster wrote:I never said it wasnt. But, in the general scale of hurricanes, Hurricane Rita was just about on the scale of Hurricane Ivan.


I thought Ivan was pretty bad.

Maybe I'm just lost as to how people think any storm is not bad.
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

#30 Postby southerngale » Thu Nov 10, 2005 4:16 pm

~Floydbuster wrote:
CajunMama wrote:
~Floydbuster wrote:
southerngale wrote:While I don't have a favorite hurricane pair, I'm surprised that Rita isn't up there at all, while other hurricanes that weren't as intense, in winds and pressure are there. hmmm, odd


Rita is considered the childs play storm compared to Katrina/Wilma. Rita's damage, while Cat 3-ish is nothing like the extreme Cat 4 damage of Wilma in the Yucatan, and the catastrophic Cat 5 damage of Katrina in LA/MA


What??????? Coastal towns wiped out....storm surge in parts of LA that had never seen storm surge....coastal wetlands wiped out...

Just because it was in an area not as populated it's considered "childs play"?


No, but it is overshadowed. Rita was a weakening Cat 3 coming onshore, with a 12-15 foot surge, unlike the 30-35 foot surge in Katrina.


Yeah, duh!! Nobody is suggesting Katrina wasn't stronger than Rita. As to your comment about child's play, I'll refrain from responding so I don't get myself banned.
0 likes   

Anonymous

#31 Postby Anonymous » Thu Nov 10, 2005 4:24 pm

southerngale wrote:
~Floydbuster wrote:
CajunMama wrote:
~Floydbuster wrote:
southerngale wrote:While I don't have a favorite hurricane pair, I'm surprised that Rita isn't up there at all, while other hurricanes that weren't as intense, in winds and pressure are there. hmmm, odd


Rita is considered the childs play storm compared to Katrina/Wilma. Rita's damage, while Cat 3-ish is nothing like the extreme Cat 4 damage of Wilma in the Yucatan, and the catastrophic Cat 5 damage of Katrina in LA/MA


What??????? Coastal towns wiped out....storm surge in parts of LA that had never seen storm surge....coastal wetlands wiped out...

Just because it was in an area not as populated it's considered "childs play"?


No, but it is overshadowed. Rita was a weakening Cat 3 coming onshore, with a 12-15 foot surge, unlike the 30-35 foot surge in Katrina.


Yeah, duh!! Nobody is suggesting Katrina wasn't stronger than Rita. As to your comment about child's play, I'll refrain from responding so I don't get myself banned.


Ugh...I said Childs Play COMPARED TO KATRINA. Rita was indeed a very destructive storm.

sunny wrote:
~Floydbuster wrote:I never said it wasnt. But, in the general scale of hurricanes, Hurricane Rita was just about on the scale of Hurricane Ivan.


I always thought the impact of Ivan, while very destructive was a little bit exaggerated, to a storm like Charley.
I thought Ivan was pretty bad.

Maybe I'm just lost as to how people think any storm is not bad.
0 likes   

User avatar
LaPlaceFF
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1303
Age: 58
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 1:21 pm
Location: Gramercy, LA
Contact:

#32 Postby LaPlaceFF » Thu Nov 10, 2005 4:31 pm

HURRICANES ARE UGLY PERIOD
0 likes   

User avatar
sunny
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7031
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 2:11 pm
Location: New Orleans

#33 Postby sunny » Thu Nov 10, 2005 4:32 pm

~Floydbuster wrote:
southerngale wrote:
~Floydbuster wrote:
CajunMama wrote:
~Floydbuster wrote:
southerngale wrote:While I don't have a favorite hurricane pair, I'm surprised that Rita isn't up there at all, while other hurricanes that weren't as intense, in winds and pressure are there. hmmm, odd


Rita is considered the childs play storm compared to Katrina/Wilma. Rita's damage, while Cat 3-ish is nothing like the extreme Cat 4 damage of Wilma in the Yucatan, and the catastrophic Cat 5 damage of Katrina in LA/MA


What??????? Coastal towns wiped out....storm surge in parts of LA that had never seen storm surge....coastal wetlands wiped out...

Just because it was in an area not as populated it's considered "childs play"?


No, but it is overshadowed. Rita was a weakening Cat 3 coming onshore, with a 12-15 foot surge, unlike the 30-35 foot surge in Katrina.


Yeah, duh!! Nobody is suggesting Katrina wasn't stronger than Rita. As to your comment about child's play, I'll refrain from responding so I don't get myself banned.


Ugh...I said Childs Play COMPARED TO KATRINA. Rita was indeed a very destructive storm.

sunny wrote:
~Floydbuster wrote:I never said it wasnt. But, in the general scale of hurricanes, Hurricane Rita was just about on the scale of Hurricane Ivan.


I always thought the impact of Ivan, while very destructive was a little bit exaggerated, to a storm like Charley.I thought Ivan was pretty bad.

Maybe I'm just lost as to how people think any storm is not bad.


I didn't write that :?:
0 likes   

Anonymous

#34 Postby Anonymous » Thu Nov 10, 2005 4:34 pm

~Floydbuster wrote:
southerngale wrote:
~Floydbuster wrote:
CajunMama wrote:
~Floydbuster wrote:
southerngale wrote:While I don't have a favorite hurricane pair, I'm surprised that Rita isn't up there at all, while other hurricanes that weren't as intense, in winds and pressure are there. hmmm, odd


Rita is considered the childs play storm compared to Katrina/Wilma. Rita's damage, while Cat 3-ish is nothing like the extreme Cat 4 damage of Wilma in the Yucatan, and the catastrophic Cat 5 damage of Katrina in LA/MA


What??????? Coastal towns wiped out....storm surge in parts of LA that had never seen storm surge....coastal wetlands wiped out...

Just because it was in an area not as populated it's considered "childs play"?


No, but it is overshadowed. Rita was a weakening Cat 3 coming onshore, with a 12-15 foot surge, unlike the 30-35 foot surge in Katrina.


Yeah, duh!! Nobody is suggesting Katrina wasn't stronger than Rita. As to your comment about child's play, I'll refrain from responding so I don't get myself banned.


Ugh...I said Childs Play COMPARED TO KATRINA. Rita was indeed a very destructive storm.

sunny wrote:
~Floydbuster wrote:I never said it wasnt. But, in the general scale of hurricanes, Hurricane Rita was just about on the scale of Hurricane Ivan.

I thought Ivan was pretty bad.

Maybe I'm just lost as to how people think any storm is not bad.


I always thought the impact of Ivan, while very destructive was a little bit exaggerated, to a storm like Charley.
0 likes   

User avatar
sunny
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7031
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 2:11 pm
Location: New Orleans

#35 Postby sunny » Thu Nov 10, 2005 4:36 pm

~Floydbuster wrote:I always thought the impact of Ivan, while very destructive was a little bit exaggerated, to a storm like Charley.


Like I said before, when you live through a cane and your life is shattered, it is major. It cannot be over exaggerated.
0 likes   

User avatar
LaPlaceFF
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1303
Age: 58
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 1:21 pm
Location: Gramercy, LA
Contact:

#36 Postby LaPlaceFF » Thu Nov 10, 2005 4:39 pm

http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=76841

This is why no pair of storms is my favorite :cry:
0 likes   

Anonymous

#37 Postby Anonymous » Thu Nov 10, 2005 4:41 pm

sunny wrote:
~Floydbuster wrote:I always thought the impact of Ivan, while very destructive was a little bit exaggerated, to a storm like Charley.


Like I said before, when you live through a cane and your life is shattered, it is major. It cannot be over exaggerated.


On the personal level? No it cannot be over exaggerated. For all we know, somebody right now is still upset about Tropical Storm Frances in 1998 in Texas, even though Frances of 1998 is not seen as quite that significant in the general scale of hurricanes. Rita will most be remembered, on the general hurricane history scale as the 4th most intense hurricane ever recorded, and for having a pressure typical of a strong Cat 4 at landfall, even though winds were of a weakening Cat 3.
0 likes   

User avatar
sunny
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7031
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 2:11 pm
Location: New Orleans

#38 Postby sunny » Thu Nov 10, 2005 4:41 pm

LaPlaceFF wrote:http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=76841

This is why no pair of storms is my favorite :cry:


I could add a few more to that list, but I won't. Let's just say this has been an experience I will never forget but wish to God I could.
0 likes   

User avatar
sunny
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7031
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 2:11 pm
Location: New Orleans

#39 Postby sunny » Thu Nov 10, 2005 4:48 pm

~Floydbuster wrote:
sunny wrote:
~Floydbuster wrote:I always thought the impact of Ivan, while very destructive was a little bit exaggerated, to a storm like Charley.


Like I said before, when you live through a cane and your life is shattered, it is major. It cannot be over exaggerated.


On the personal level? No it cannot be over exaggerated. For all we know, somebody right now is still upset about Tropical Storm Frances in 1998 in Texas, even though Frances of 1998 is not seen as quite that significant in the general scale of hurricanes. Rita will most be remembered, on the general hurricane history scale as the 4th most intense hurricane ever recorded, and for having a pressure typical of a strong Cat 4 at landfall, even though winds were of a weakening Cat 3.


Concerning Rita:

In total, it is estimated that well over 2 million customers were without electricity. [6] Total insured damage is estimated at $4-6 billion, which means the overall damage will likely be between $8-11 billion. [7]

The reported death toll as of 10 p.m. CDT on October 3 (0300 UTC October 4) stands at 119. Only six of them were direct deaths. One was caused by a hurricane-related tornado in the outer bands, and three others were caused by fallen trees during the storm. The two Florida deaths were both in rip currents on beaches caused by Rita's distant waves.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Rita

I think that is pretty bad.
0 likes   

f5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1550
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:29 pm
Location: Waco,tx

#40 Postby f5 » Thu Nov 10, 2005 4:53 pm

Rita might have been Ivan strength but Rita had Camille type surge at landfall 22 ft .That CAT 5 surge leveled Cameron to nothing but slabs.that part of the louisiana coast looks like Mississippi.it seems like Rita and Katrina really kicked Camille around this year.which before was called the "Benchmark" storm
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AnnularCane, CourierPR, crownweather, cstrunk, cycloneye, FLCrackerGirl and 107 guests