vaffie wrote:Did you guys realize that 35 "Hurricane Andrew eyes" could comfortably fit within Wilma's eye with 80 square miles of space left over...

Moderator: S2k Moderators
superfly wrote:vaffie wrote:Did you guys realize that 35 "Hurricane Andrew eyes" could comfortably fit within Wilma's eye with 80 square miles of space left over...
No way, Andrew's eye was about 15 miles wide. Latest recon was a 60 mile eye for Wilma so that's roughly 15 Andrew eyes inside Wilma's eye.
jrtalon wrote:LOL at the druck guy on Foxnews.
THead wrote:jrtalon wrote:LOL at the druck guy on Foxnews.
Can't beat the coverage on CBS 4 with Bryan Norcross. IMHO
For those who missed the link:
http://www.cbs4.com
vaffie wrote:superfly wrote:vaffie wrote:Did you guys realize that 35 "Hurricane Andrew eyes" could comfortably fit within Wilma's eye with 80 square miles of space left over...
No way, Andrew's eye was about 15 miles wide. Latest recon was a 60 mile eye for Wilma so that's roughly 15 Andrew eyes inside Wilma's eye.
Thank you for correcting me. But it wasn't 15 at landfall. The NHC says it was 11 knots on average at landfall--making it 12 miles.
See: http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1992andrew.html
Scorpion wrote:I am running on adreneline here. Waiting and ready for some shock and awe. I expect Cat 2 winds. This is going to be a long night.
Brent wrote:Scorpion wrote:I am running on adreneline here. Waiting and ready for some shock and awe. I expect Cat 2 winds. This is going to be a long night.
You might as well go to sleep, the Cat 2 winds won't be there til after sunrise anyway.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests