Model changes????

bucman1 · #1 Postby **bucman1** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:42 pm

Do you nexpect any drastic model changes???

#2 Postby **feederband** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 11:23 pm

Yes I expect them to start throwing their computers against the walls.... :wink:

#3 Postby **NateFLA** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 11:25 pm

I'm pretty sure those fine, scantily clad, beautiful ladies will still be just what they were before wilma, so no, no model changes.

And for the record, VDGU is my favorite model... Vida Guerra.

:lol:

#4 Postby **feederband** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 11:26 pm

NateFLA wrote:I'm pretty sure those fine, scantily clad, beautiful ladies will still be just what they were before wilma, so no, no model changes.

And for the record, VDGU is my favorite model... Vida Guerra.

Maybe she can tell us where Wilma is going... :wink:

StrongWind · #5 Postby **StrongWind** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 11:49 pm

feederband wrote:
NateFLA wrote:I'm pretty sure those fine, scantily clad, beautiful ladies will still be just what they were before wilma, so no, no model changes.

And for the record, VDGU is my favorite model... Vida Guerra.

Maybe she can tell us where Wilma is going...

Brings to mind an image of an annual 'Miss Hurricane' pageant. The winner sits in the NHC and throws darts at a wall map to come up with the forecast path.

Typhoon_Willie · #6 Postby **Typhoon_Willie** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 12:17 am

A little veiled insult to the NHC here? Lets understand that these individuals at the NHC probably have forgotten more about tracking storms than you would ever know. I find it interesting that the NHC has called every landfall correctly this season. And yet there are still people who despite all the evidence to the contrary will still make a remark such as the one above. Remarks like this during this time are not needed now. :roll:

curtinnc · #7 Postby **curtinnc** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 12:32 am

Typhoon_Willie wrote:A little veiled insult to the NHC here? Lets understand that these individuals at the NHC probably have forgotten more about tracking storms than you would ever know. I find it interesting that the NHC has called every landfall correctly this season. And yet there are still people who despite all the evidence to the contrary will still make a remark such as the one above. Remarks like this during this time are not needed now.

Relax, it's weather for god sake. No-one can get it right all the time...

StrongWind · #8 Postby **StrongWind** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 1:07 am

Typhoon_Willie wrote:A little veiled insult to the NHC here? Lets understand that these individuals at the NHC probably have forgotten more about tracking storms than you would ever know. I find it interesting that the NHC has called every landfall correctly this season. And yet there are still people who despite all the evidence to the contrary will still make a remark such as the one above. Remarks like this during this time are not needed now.

It was nothing more than an amusing mental image that occured to me. Before you run around accusing people of things and then insulting them, maybe you should take a deep breath and see if there really is any basis for it. Perhaps we can write off your imagining things to sleep deprivation with all the excitement, stress, and all. I have nothing but the greatest respect for all the NOAA folks and esp. the NHC. I'm on the edge of my seat every six hours waiting for the latest update.

But you nailed my forecasting expertise. It's perhaps a bit better than throwing darts.

Typhoon_Willie · #9 Postby **Typhoon_Willie** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 1:15 am

Well now I can see that I am in the wrong here regarding my post. I apologize if I sounded insulting. I do see a lot posts in this forum that have bashed the NHC in the past. I thought this could be another. Obiviously I was very wrong and I profusely apologize for that.

Model changes????

Model changes????

Who is online