wxman57 wrote:dhweather wrote:Eric-
The houses were gutted due to storm surge - the water was 8 to 10
feet deep NORTH of I-10. There is a lot of wind damage as well, I'd
say Katrina was a cat 4 wind-wise at Diamondhead, and a cat 5+
surge wise.
David
If the winds were 135 mph sustained (Cat 4), then how would you explain the fact that the shingles weren't peeled off all the roofs and the homes blown apart? Not to get into that argument about Katrina being a lower-end Cat 3 at landfall again, but the data do not support Cat 4 sustained 1-minute winds inland into your area. Data from the HRD post-storm analysis suggest 90-100 mph sustained in Diamondhead (Cat 2), with possible gusts to 120-130 mph. With 135 mph 1-minute winds, you would have had gusts about 25% above that figure, or close to 170 mph. Photos don't suggest such winds. Could have been a few gusts to Cat 4 strength, though. Keep in mind that it's very rare for such a large area to actually experience Cat 1-2 sustained 1-minute winds (not gusts) in any landfalling hurricane. That's probably stronger than you've seen in any hurricane since Camille, and it probably seemed like Cat 4 winds to you. But without anything to compare such winds to, it's hard to estimate such speeds.
http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Storm_page ... ll_mph.pdf
I measure your distance inland at about 2.6 miles, with I-10 about 0.75 miles north of the Bay. That was some storm surge damage, which I'll get to see for myself in a few days. I'll be heading your way on Wednesday morning enroute my mother's storm-damaged home in Gautier. She had 50 sheets of drywall delivered yesterday, so I'll have my work cut out for me.
Yes you will! Good luck with that!
I base my winds on the only record we have, the Diamondhead FD,
where the anemometer failed at 144mph.
There's other spots just east of here (Pass Christian) that have much more wind damage. You'll get to see in a few days.
PM me if you'd like to stop in Diamondhead for lunch/dinner, there is one
place open!
David





