Hurricane Wilma Recon Discussion Thread
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- weatherSnoop
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 702
- Age: 63
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 10:06 pm
- Location: Tampa, FL
- Contact:
- NCHurricane
- Category 1

- Posts: 400
- Age: 54
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 2:50 pm
- Location: Winterville, North Carolina, USA
- Contact:
jpigott wrote:anyone see where that 175mph reading was in the SE quad, did they even take a measurement in the NE quad
05: 06:10:00; 16.9°N 82.1°W; PA: 10033ft; D-Val: -1109 ft; Wnd: SSW (206°) @ 152mph (Max: 165mph); T: 51F; D: ****; Radar Alt: 9091ft
06: 06:10:30; 17°N 82.2°W; PA: 10095ft; D-Val: -1942 ft; Wnd: SSW (201°) @ 182mph (Max: 194mph); T: 51F; D: ****; Radar Alt: 8320ft
0 likes
-
wayoutfront
- NCHurricane
- Category 1

- Posts: 400
- Age: 54
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 2:50 pm
- Location: Winterville, North Carolina, USA
- Contact:
-
SamSagnella
- Category 2

- Posts: 630
- Age: 39
- Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:02 pm
- Location: Westport, CT
- Contact:
I WOULD KILL TO BE ON THAT RECON FLIGHT TONIGHT. THOSE 'FEW GOOD MEN' HAVE WITNESSED THINGS THAT NO OTHER HUMANS HAVE SEEN IN THE HISTORY OF TIME.
There's a nearly-full moon and the stadium effect in the 2mi eye of a 892mb/175mph storm must look more like a tornado than a typical hurricane's eye. Damn that would be cool to see.
There's a nearly-full moon and the stadium effect in the 2mi eye of a 892mb/175mph storm must look more like a tornado than a typical hurricane's eye. Damn that would be cool to see.
Last edited by SamSagnella on Wed Oct 19, 2005 1:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- milankovitch
- Tropical Storm

- Posts: 243
- Age: 40
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 11:30 pm
- Location: Menands, NY; SUNY Albany
- Contact:
- weatherSnoop
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 702
- Age: 63
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 10:06 pm
- Location: Tampa, FL
- Contact:
- senorpepr
- Military Met/Moderator

- Posts: 12542
- Age: 43
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
- Location: Mackenbach, Germany
- Contact:
NCHurricane wrote:jpigott wrote:anyone see where that 175mph reading was in the SE quad, did they even take a measurement in the NE quad
05: 06:10:00; 16.9°N 82.1°W; PA: 10033ft; D-Val: -1109 ft; Wnd: SSW (206°) @ 152mph (Max: 165mph); T: 51F; D: ****; Radar Alt: 9091ft
06: 06:10:30; 17°N 82.2°W; PA: 10095ft; D-Val: -1942 ft; Wnd: SSW (201°) @ 182mph (Max: 194mph); T: 51F; D: ****; Radar Alt: 8320ft
That wasn't in the NE quad. It wasn't sampled. Those obs came from the "weak" SE quad.
0 likes
-
wayoutfront
- NCHurricane
- Category 1

- Posts: 400
- Age: 54
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 2:50 pm
- Location: Winterville, North Carolina, USA
- Contact:
senorpepr wrote:NCHurricane wrote:jpigott wrote:anyone see where that 175mph reading was in the SE quad, did they even take a measurement in the NE quad
05: 06:10:00; 16.9°N 82.1°W; PA: 10033ft; D-Val: -1109 ft; Wnd: SSW (206°) @ 152mph (Max: 165mph); T: 51F; D: ****; Radar Alt: 9091ft
06: 06:10:30; 17°N 82.2°W; PA: 10095ft; D-Val: -1942 ft; Wnd: SSW (201°) @ 182mph (Max: 194mph); T: 51F; D: ****; Radar Alt: 8320ft
That wasn't in the NE quad. It wasn't sampled. Those obs came from the "weak" SE quad.
Sorry, the poster asked where the data was recorded in the SE quad. I should've included that was what I was posting. My apologies for any confusion.
0 likes
-
Stratosphere747
- Category 5

- Posts: 3772
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
- Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: duilaslol and 336 guests



