Is a fifty foot surge possible?????

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#21 Postby wxmann_91 » Tue Oct 11, 2005 9:02 pm

Not even close. The NWS has revised the max surge from 32 ft to 28 ft.

Is it possible? Well I'm not sure. I guess it is if a Cat 5 slams into NYC.
0 likes   

krysof

#22 Postby krysof » Tue Oct 11, 2005 9:04 pm

wxmann_91 wrote:Not even close. The NWS has revised the max surge from 32 ft to 28 ft.

Is it possible? Well I'm not sure. I guess it is if a Cat 5 slams into NYC.


I think galveston has a good chance
0 likes   

f5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1550
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:29 pm
Location: Waco,tx

#23 Postby f5 » Tue Oct 11, 2005 9:06 pm

krysof wrote:
wxmann_91 wrote:Not even close. The NWS has revised the max surge from 32 ft to 28 ft.

Is it possible? Well I'm not sure. I guess it is if a Cat 5 slams into NYC.


I think galveston has a good chance


i wonder where i can find data like that.hunting for it gets awful hard
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#24 Postby wxmann_91 » Tue Oct 11, 2005 9:09 pm

krysof wrote:
wxmann_91 wrote:Not even close. The NWS has revised the max surge from 32 ft to 28 ft.

Is it possible? Well I'm not sure. I guess it is if a Cat 5 slams into NYC.


I think galveston has a good chance


The bathymetry offshore of Galveston is much deeper than the bathymetry to the east I think.
0 likes   

DoctorHurricane2003

#25 Postby DoctorHurricane2003 » Tue Oct 11, 2005 9:17 pm

I think the highest possible surge along the gulf could occur at the northern end of Mobile Bay if a category 5 hit just west of there, making the bay act as a funnel to the northern end, causing extreme surge heights.

Code: Select all

Think about it like this (general terms):
x= unit of water

you have 20 units of water going into a bay that is 10 dash marks across at the southern end:

----------
xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxx

By the time it reaches the northern end, the bay is only 2 dash marks across, but you still have 20 units of water

    --   
xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxx

^except that the water isn't all the way across, remember it is being funneled, so it looks more like this:
Y = 2 units of water

--
YY
YY
YY
YY
YY

Perhaps even higher.  This surge would flood the northern end of the bay tremendously....and guess what is on the NW end of the bay....yep, the city of Mobile.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ixolib
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2741
Age: 68
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 8:55 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

#26 Postby Ixolib » Tue Oct 11, 2005 9:33 pm

wxmann_91 wrote:Not even close. The NWS has revised the max surge from 32 ft to 28 ft...


If this statement reflects Katrina's surge, the NWS needs to physically come to town and spend a few days with a measuring tape and some surveying equipment. There are many eye-witness accounts of some hotels (that are still standing) that have a level surge line only inches from the ceilings in their second floor rooms - and they were built at 10+ feet above MSL.
0 likes   

User avatar
WeatherNole
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 109
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:18 pm
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Contact:

I think . . . .

#27 Postby WeatherNole » Tue Oct 11, 2005 9:37 pm

I believe that based on all the S.L.O.S.H. basins and scenarios that have been run, the highest surge potential is 38 feet in Apalachee Bay.

I'll see if I can find some kind of verification.

Mike

--
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#28 Postby wxmann_91 » Tue Oct 11, 2005 9:42 pm

Ixolib wrote:
wxmann_91 wrote:Not even close. The NWS has revised the max surge from 32 ft to 28 ft...


If this statement reflects Katrina's surge, the NWS needs to physically come to town and spend a few days with a measuring tape and some surveying equipment. There are many eye-witness accounts of some hotels (that are still standing) that have a level surge line only inches from the ceilings in their second floor rooms - and they were built at 10+ feet above MSL.


Sorry, I meant the max measured surge. The final determined max surge could still be higher. However, the trend is down.

Now, I would have no idea how the water line would be so high compared to the recorded surge.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23080
Age: 68
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#29 Postby wxman57 » Tue Oct 11, 2005 9:45 pm

dolebot_Broward_NW wrote:20 foot surge with a 30 foot wave atop it.


For the record, such a scenario would produce a 35 ft peak, not 50 ft. A 30 foot wave extends above mean sea level by only 15 feet. The other 15 feet is below mean sea level. Waves are measured from crest to trough, not crest to mean sea level.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#30 Postby Derek Ortt » Tue Oct 11, 2005 9:50 pm

some of the water may have been wave related in MS, but once trapped in a room, it will resemble level water

The surge to wave height may have only been 5 feet as the region is not very wave prone, and the waves move very rapidly in shallow water, so in places, waves may have been nearly on top of each other
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#31 Postby Lindaloo » Tue Oct 11, 2005 10:03 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:some of the water may have been wave related in MS, but once trapped in a room, it will resemble level water

The surge to wave height may have only been 5 feet as the region is not very wave prone, and the waves move very rapidly in shallow water, so in places, waves may have been nearly on top of each other


Tell that to some of the people holding on to roofs until a wave would push them high enough to get onto the roof. Tell that to the people on Market Street in Pascagoula that saw a huge wall of water with white caps coming at them. Tell that to my dentist who was going to ride it out in his home on the beach here but changed his mind when he noticed the waves going out instead of in at 4:30 in the morning!
0 likes   

f5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1550
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:29 pm
Location: Waco,tx

#32 Postby f5 » Tue Oct 11, 2005 11:20 pm

Lindaloo wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:some of the water may have been wave related in MS, but once trapped in a room, it will resemble level water

The surge to wave height may have only been 5 feet as the region is not very wave prone, and the waves move very rapidly in shallow water, so in places, waves may have been nearly on top of each other


Tell that to some of the people holding on to roofs until a wave would push them high enough to get onto the roof. Tell that to the people on Market Street in Pascagoula that saw a huge wall of water with white caps coming at them. Tell that to my dentist who was going to ride it out in his home on the beach here but changed his mind when he noticed the waves going out instead of in at 4:30 in the morning!


lets not start a fight.we just have to wait on the NHC number
0 likes   

f5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1550
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:29 pm
Location: Waco,tx

Re: I think . . . .

#33 Postby f5 » Tue Oct 11, 2005 11:21 pm

WeatherNole wrote:I believe that based on all the S.L.O.S.H. basins and scenarios that have been run, the highest surge potential is 38 feet in Apalachee Bay.

I'll see if I can find some kind of verification.

Mike

--


back in july dennis did a number on that area st marks had serious flooding
0 likes   

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5937
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

#34 Postby MGC » Tue Oct 11, 2005 11:43 pm

Lindaloo, are you saying your dentist noticed the water being sucked away from the beach at 4:30?.......MGC
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#35 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Oct 12, 2005 12:56 am

regardless as to the extent of the surge and wave height rise, the water rises in both cases
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#36 Postby Lindaloo » Wed Oct 12, 2005 5:39 am

MGC wrote:Lindaloo, are you saying your dentist noticed the water being sucked away from the beach at 4:30?.......MGC


Yes ma'am. When he saw that he left to ride out the storm in his dentist office. He still foated around in about 8 feet of water.
0 likes   

User avatar
weatherwoman
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 364
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 9:09 pm
Location: Newport North Carolina
Contact:

#37 Postby weatherwoman » Wed Oct 12, 2005 11:26 am

has new york ever had a hurricane
0 likes   

User avatar
mitchell
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 440
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2003 8:22 am
Location: Delaware
Contact:

#38 Postby mitchell » Wed Oct 12, 2005 12:08 pm

dolebot_Broward_NW wrote:20 foot surge with a 30 foot wave atop it.


Not onshore...maybe offshore under the right conditions....shoaling of 30 foot waves would be tremendous before the waves reached the shoreline.
0 likes   

User avatar
mitchell
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 440
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2003 8:22 am
Location: Delaware
Contact:

#39 Postby mitchell » Wed Oct 12, 2005 12:11 pm

f5 wrote:didn't Katrina's get close?
I just spent two weeks on disaster relief in from Biloxi westward to the Louisiana line....I'd say the storm surge was in the neighborhood of 20-25 feet. This is based on observing hundreds of buildings, debris lines, water lines, and other evidence. It was staggering.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ixolib
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2741
Age: 68
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 8:55 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

#40 Postby Ixolib » Wed Oct 12, 2005 12:29 pm

mitchell wrote:
f5 wrote:didn't Katrina's get close?
I just spent two weeks on disaster relief in from Biloxi westward to the Louisiana line....I'd say the storm surge was in the neighborhood of 20-25 feet. This is based on observing hundreds of buildings, debris lines, water lines, and other evidence. It was staggering.


...and the surge saga continues.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Team Ghost and 43 guests