How Much Will 92L Develop

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K

How Much Will 92L Develop?

Major Hurricane
19
10%
Hurricane
55
30%
Tropical Storm
57
31%
Depression
16
9%
Extra-tropical Low
21
11%
It will just be an Invest
17
9%
 
Total votes: 185

Message
Author
User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23703
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#41 Postby gatorcane » Mon Oct 03, 2005 6:05 pm

interesting numbers after running this poll all day. Seems like the most votes have gone to 92L forming into a hurricane even though most mets say otherwise... :?:
0 likes   

User avatar
Canelaw99
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2128
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:27 am
Location: Homestead, FL

#42 Postby Canelaw99 » Mon Oct 03, 2005 6:07 pm

cycloneye wrote:Ok order in the house. :)


Sirloin medium rare with a salad please :A:

Sorry, Luis, couldn't resist :wink:
0 likes   

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

#43 Postby WeatherEmperor » Mon Oct 03, 2005 6:09 pm

boca_chris wrote:interesting numbers after running this poll all day. Seems like the most votes have gone to 92L forming into a hurricane even though most mets say otherwise... :?:


I have very high confidence in the mets. Its really difficult to know for sure whats gonna happen with this system though.

<RICKY>
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11166
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

#44 Postby Ivanhater » Mon Oct 03, 2005 6:14 pm

Canelaw99 wrote:
cycloneye wrote:Ok order in the house. :)


Sirloin medium rare with a salad please :A:

Sorry, Luis, couldn't resist :wink:


HAAAA, ill take mine medium well!
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

#45 Postby WindRunner » Mon Oct 03, 2005 6:49 pm

ivanhater wrote:
Canelaw99 wrote:
cycloneye wrote:Ok order in the house. :)


Sirloin medium rare with a salad please :A:

Sorry, Luis, couldn't resist :wink:


HAAAA, ill take mine medium well!


And some lemonade would be nice to go with my vote of "hurricane." Keeping it in Florida.
0 likes   

User avatar
HurricaneQueen
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1011
Age: 80
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 7:36 pm
Location: No. Naples, Fl (Vanderbilt Beach area)

#46 Postby HurricaneQueen » Mon Oct 03, 2005 6:58 pm

Extratropical low, at most. I just don't see this developing as it currently stands.

As inaugural member here, I just have to say I agree that the tone of this board has changed for the worse this year. When we started in Oct 2002, we were one big happy family with a few exceptions. Most of us were fleeing this very same type of atmosphere. With all of the wonderful efforts seen here (great input from pros and amateurs alike, hunting tirelessly for victims of our recent hurricanes, etc.) it's a shame that the rudeness stands out so strongly. (This is not in response to any particular post or poster).

While it is refreshing to have so many younger weather enthusiasts, I am always appalled when a 14-16 year old (or anyone) corrects or argues with a ProMet. If I had put the time and effort into getting the education the Mets have, I certainly would go elsewhere. It would be a shame to lose their expertise but that is the direction I see us moving.

Also, I know this isn't practical but I also know I'm not alone: I think that the number of posts a person can make in one day should be limited. There are certain members who monopolize the board either in an effort to get attention or to increase their number of posts. This is not productive and causes the rest of us to wade through senseless posts to try to find the facts.

OK. I realize that this will not be a popular post with many and I will now step down from my soapbox but some of these things just HAD to be said.

Lynn

The above in no way reflects on the wonderful Admins and Mods. You have my admiration for a job well done with no compensation and little reward. You guys rock!

Thank you for the great post, canelaw. You always say the right things and it's pleasure to be a co-member with you and many others.
0 likes   
GO FLORIDA GATORS

User avatar
Canelaw99
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2128
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:27 am
Location: Homestead, FL

#47 Postby Canelaw99 » Mon Oct 03, 2005 7:24 pm

:sun: Thank you HQueen - I appreciate that :) Of course, my hubby would disagree with ya that I always say the right things ;) lol
0 likes   

Anthysteg

#48 Postby Anthysteg » Mon Oct 03, 2005 7:29 pm

HurricaneQueen wrote:Extratropical low, at most. I just don't see this developing as it currently stands.

As inaugural member here, I just have to say I agree that the tone of this board has changed for the worse this year. When we started in Oct 2002, we were one big happy family with a few exceptions. Most of us were fleeing this very same type of atmosphere. With all of the wonderful efforts seen here (great input from pros and amateurs alike, hunting tirelessly for victims of our recent hurricanes, etc.) it's a shame that the rudeness stands out so strongly. (This is not in response to any particular post or poster).

While it is refreshing to have so many younger weather enthusiasts, I am always appalled when a 14-16 year old (or anyone) corrects or argues with a ProMet. If I had put the time and effort into getting the education the Mets have, I certainly would go elsewhere. It would be a shame to lose their expertise but that is the direction I see us moving.

Also, I know this isn't practical but I also know I'm not alone: I think that the number of posts a person can make in one day should be limited. There are certain members who monopolize the board either in an effort to get attention or to increase their number of posts. This is not productive and causes the rest of us to wade through senseless posts to try to find the facts.

OK. I realize that this will not be a popular post with many and I will now step down from my soapbox but some of these things just HAD to be said.

Lynn

The above in no way reflects on the wonderful Admins and Mods. You have my admiration for a job well done with no compensation and little reward. You guys rock!

Thank you for the great post, canelaw. You always say the right things and it's pleasure to be a co-member with you and many others.



I respect your post....however, I do disagree with some of your logic.


If people vote against pro's decisions on intensity here is it really a big deal? Isn't that what the topic was made for? I suppose you mean IN GENERAL and not specifically this topic, which is cool.


But if so why even bring that here? I don't understand.



And with that I step down with all hopes of avoiding confrontation.
0 likes   

User avatar
HurricaneQueen
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1011
Age: 80
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 7:36 pm
Location: No. Naples, Fl (Vanderbilt Beach area)

#49 Postby HurricaneQueen » Mon Oct 03, 2005 7:57 pm

No confrontation and perhaps this was the wrong forum. For THAT I apologize. I have no problem with this poll and people's opinions-after all they are mostly guesses. It is the confrontational tone that this board has taken on in general. I'm a lot older than most and have been around weather boards for years but would never speak down to a person expressing their educated opinion after they have studied meteorology for years and do forecasting for a living.

Once again, wrong forum. Sorry.

Lynn
0 likes   
GO FLORIDA GATORS

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#50 Postby Air Force Met » Mon Oct 03, 2005 8:18 pm

dixiebreeze wrote:
dixiebreeze wrote:Ugh -- not enough coffee, I guess. Of course I meant the Bahamas!


Air Force Met -- Apparently you did not read the above follow-up post. Rudeness on this forum is reaching new heights lately.


Did you NOT see the smiley emoticon? Maybe next time I won't bother to put it in so that you won't know for sure if I was kidding you or not. And no...I did not read it...I don't read the whole thread before I post a comment. If I see something that needs commenting on...I do it then.

As far as reaching new heights...I think a lot of it has to do with people getting hyper sensative and turning every blob into a cat 5. It gets a little frustrating on this end too. There is probably a happy medium...people like me can be a little more tolerant...and others could refrain from being so sensational...thus provoking people like me. :wink:

Note the WINK!
0 likes   

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

#51 Postby fci » Mon Oct 03, 2005 9:31 pm

I vote Extra Tropical Low.

And as for any criticism towards Air Force Met, he was kidding.

As far as this observer is concerned, AFM provides some of the best insight into his thinking on foreacsts and I read EVERY one of his posts carefully as he takes the time to explain what he thinks and why.
Some Pros make quick comments, all are appreciated; but then don't explain why they are forecasting what they are foreacsting.
AFM always provides his reasoning and has a wealth of knowledge that we should encourage!
Plus, when he sees something wrong, he notes it and sometimes takes the sarcastic kids to the woodshed, which I especially enjoy!!!!
0 likes   

User avatar
dixiebreeze
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5140
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:07 pm
Location: crystal river, fla.

#52 Postby dixiebreeze » Mon Oct 03, 2005 10:15 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
dixiebreeze wrote:
dixiebreeze wrote:Ugh -- not enough coffee, I guess. Of course I meant the Bahamas!


Air Force Met -- Apparently you did not read the above follow-up post. Rudeness on this forum is reaching new heights lately.


Did you NOT see the smiley emoticon? Maybe next time I won't bother to put it in so that you won't know for sure if I was kidding you or not. And no...I did not read it...I don't read the whole thread before I post a comment. If I see something that needs commenting on...I do it then.

As far as reaching new heights...I think a lot of it has to do with people getting hyper sensative and turning every blob into a cat 5. It gets a little frustrating on this end too. There is probably a happy medium...people like me can be a little more tolerant...and others could refrain from being so sensational...thus provoking people like me. :wink:

Note the WINK!


I do admire your literate response and I've NEVER quarreled with your weather observations. That said, I've also never turned blobs into Cat 5's. If I had a nickel for every "sensational" post made by members I'd be wealthy. Note the SMILE :D
0 likes   

User avatar
ameriwx2003
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 980
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 10:45 am

#53 Postby ameriwx2003 » Mon Oct 03, 2005 11:14 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
dixiebreeze wrote:
dixiebreeze wrote:Ugh -- not enough coffee, I guess. Of course I meant the Bahamas!


Air Force Met -- Apparently you did not read the above follow-up post. Rudeness on this forum is reaching new heights lately.


Did you NOT see the smiley emoticon? Maybe next time I won't bother to put it in so that you won't know for sure if I was kidding you or not. And no...I did not read it...I don't read the whole thread before I post a comment. If I see something that needs commenting on...I do it then.

As far as reaching new heights...I think a lot of it has to do with people getting hyper sensative and turning every blob into a cat 5. It gets a little frustrating on this end too. There is probably a happy medium...people like me can be a little more tolerant...and others could refrain from being so sensational...thus provoking people like me. :wink:

Note the WINK!

AFM.. I do see your point and your right people will get excited about every blob and will say Andrew and Katrina started out this way about every blob but then again this isn't the Tropical analysis forum its the talkin tropics forum and its to be expected to see people get overly excited about things in here. Like you said I guess there is a happy medium someplace:):)
0 likes   

inotherwords
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 773
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 9:04 pm
Location: Nokomis, FL

#54 Postby inotherwords » Tue Oct 04, 2005 1:08 am

I think this would all be easily solved if there was an optional ignore capability in this forum. I know the people I respect and it would be great to screen out the obvious attention-seekers, chicken littles and people I disagree with.

I hope the mods can look into adding this to the forum software capabiliities. I love this place and I do think policing the irresponsible posters is important. I'm glad the moderators do that and I think they do a great job of it.
0 likes   

Josephine96

#55 Postby Josephine96 » Tue Oct 04, 2005 4:19 am

I say medium TS, with a landfall in south Central Florida within 36-48 hours..

Of course, I could be wrong lol
0 likes   

NastyCat4

#56 Postby NastyCat4 » Tue Oct 04, 2005 12:26 pm

You are already wrong--the storm is practically on top of Florida now--we're getting rain and wind from it, and it won't have much of a chance to organize, as the leading edge is already hitting the coast of Florida. Any organization would be in the Gulf--look at the Miami radar and you will see that we're already being affected by the entity (whatever it is). So, there's no 36 hour interval for something that's here already.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AnnularCane, ElectricStorm, Europa non è lontana, Google [Bot], StormWeather, Torgo and 58 guests