Katrina H-Wind Analysis, marginal 3 at landfall

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 148497
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#61 Postby cycloneye » Thu Sep 29, 2005 3:30 pm

Cleaned.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

#62 Postby dhweather » Thu Sep 29, 2005 3:33 pm

I'm not a meterologist.

I do not play one on TV.

I didn't stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.

But I will tell you from first hand damage that the winds were cat 4,
and the surge was cat 5 PLUS. NOAA has told insurance companies that
Pass Christian/Bay St. Louis had a surge of 35 to 40 feet. Diamondhead
had 30-35, easily. When water comes inland up to 8 miles, that's no
regular storm surge.

Washington Parish, Louisiana - the parish president was on WWL a week
ago or so. He stated that "75% of all trees are down in the parish,
100% down in many large areas. I've never seen anything to beat it.
Nobody has seen anything like it"

I've stated before - the Diamondhead Fire Department anemometer failed
at 146MPH. Mine went at 60MPH because some flying debris smashed it
early on.

I just hooked up my Davis Vantage Pro II to replace my Katrina-destroyed
Davis Vantage Pro. :D
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8250
Age: 52
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

#63 Postby jasons2k » Thu Sep 29, 2005 3:47 pm

Hey DH,

I am so glad you are up and running again!!

Aside from the anemometer reading, the description is more a testament to the size of Katrina rather than pure intensity.

A cat. 3 is going to bring down trees in large numbers. Normally it would be in a smaller area. The fact that it got 75% in the whole parish does not mean the winds were more intense (Cat. 4), but rather an example of just how large and widespread the windfield was. That, in turn, resulted in the massive surge as well.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38264
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#64 Postby Brent » Thu Sep 29, 2005 3:54 pm

There's no question Katrina had the surge of a Cat 5... there's no disputing that. Afterall, it WAS a Cat 5 until 12 hours before landfall. I still question these wind measurements though. I do believe it was a Cat 4 when it hit the LA coast... HOWEVER... it would have weakened some and I believe it was a Strong 3 for the 2nd landfall.
0 likes   
#neversummer

User avatar
gratefulnole
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 77
Age: 60
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:29 pm
Location: tallahassee, fl

#65 Postby gratefulnole » Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:08 pm

Structural wind damage is not due to just windspeed but also how long it is exposed to those winds and the how strong the gusts are that affect a particular structure. Additionally tornado damage must be taken into account.
100 mph winds for 3 hours can possibly due more damge than 120 mph winds for 30 minutes.
0 likes   

User avatar
TS Zack
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 925
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 6:23 pm
Location: Louisiana
Contact:

#66 Postby TS Zack » Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:20 pm

I just got back from Grand Isle, La. The wind damage is horrible. I have never seen anything like it. My grandpa compares it when he went to Waveland after Camille. Entire camps are flipped like toys. There is just nothing left.

Also, I talked to the Coast Guard at the station on the end of the island and they said they reported sustained winds of 145mph with Gusts to 180mph. Take it with a grain of salt but thats just what the Coast Guard told me.
0 likes   

LAStorm01
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 1:46 pm
Location: Mandeville, LA (24 miles N of NO)

#67 Postby LAStorm01 » Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:29 pm

TS Zack wrote:I just got back from Grand Isle, La. The wind damage is horrible. I have never seen anything like it. My grandpa compares it when he went to Waveland after Camille. Entire camps are flipped like toys. There is just nothing left.

Also, I talked to the Coast Guard at the station on the end of the island and they said they reported sustained winds of 145mph with Gusts to 180mph. Take it with a grain of salt but thats just what the Coast Guard told me.


How about instrument failure. I heard some of the NOAA instruments were lost and so there was no longer data to post... instrument failure could have something to do with 'real-data'.
0 likes   

Charles-KD5ZSM
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 5:09 pm
Location: Ocean Springs, MS

#68 Postby Charles-KD5ZSM » Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:35 pm

Lindaloo wrote:I have observed CAT4 damage, no doubt about it. This is not from the surge either.


Great reply, ivanhater. Alot of the catastrophic damage in MS/AL was the surge with 10 to 15 foot waves on top of that. Louisiana suffered from the breaches in the levees. P"Cola suffered hurricane force wind damage. Gulf Shores sustained damage also from the surge.


Got that right. I did a damage assesment for Harrison County Civil Defense. I couldn't fit the report into one whole radio transmission.
0 likes   

Dave C
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 868
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 4:36 pm
Location: Middleboro, Mass.(midway between Cape Cod and Boston)

well

#69 Postby Dave C » Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:39 pm

Before this thread get's locked I'll post my thoughts. After watching Jim Leonards footage from Slidel(mostly west eyewall) there seemed to be very impressive gusts, Jim estimated 140mph gusts and he's been through countless hurricanes and typhoons. The sustained winds seemed considerably less but those impressive gusts could definately do much damage. Surprisingly, in the southern eyewall the winds and rain were pretty impressive though somewhat less than the first part indicating the southern eyewall was re-developing on landfall. Always interesting to debate scientific data. :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
Aslkahuna
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4550
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ
Contact:

#70 Postby Aslkahuna » Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:43 pm

To Scorpion re rapid decrease in windspeeds in hurricanes. Anyone who tracks EPAC hurricanes knows just how fast a full blown hurricane can croak when the dynamics and other conditions favorable to its maintenance go south. Same for storms in CENPAC (or in the ATL when they hit the Great Wall of Shear). In fact, JTWC has documented cases where full blown typhoons (one a Super) became TDs in 24-36 hours due to shear. For all their ferocity and power, hurricanes are actually very delicate and if conditions become unfavorable they can very quickly lose intensity.

Steve
0 likes   

User avatar
TS Zack
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 925
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 6:23 pm
Location: Louisiana
Contact:

#71 Postby TS Zack » Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:47 pm

http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/zackety/my_photos

Maybe so Lagal! From what I seen from the Western Eyewall. I and everyone else in Grand Isle lost everything. I don't see this being no 3, maybe stronger than a 4.

Either way you put it. Everything is gone.
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8250
Age: 52
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

#72 Postby jasons2k » Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:59 pm

TS Zack wrote:http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/zackety/my_photos

Maybe so Lagal! From what I seen from the Western Eyewall. I and everyone else in Grand Isle lost everything. I don't see this being no 3, maybe stronger than a 4.

Either way you put it. Everything is gone.


This is in no way meant to diminish what happened there and those who lost everything, but those pictures don't show Cat. 4 or 5 wind damage. Roofs on the buildings, in some cases the metal roofs not even peeled off. Windows still intact, etc.

They look nothing like Homestead in 1992.
0 likes   

User avatar
TS Zack
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 925
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 6:23 pm
Location: Louisiana
Contact:

#73 Postby TS Zack » Thu Sep 29, 2005 5:13 pm

Being in the Western Eyewall, I think that is pretty darn horrible. I could see if it was a direct hit on Grand Isle.

What I don't understand is where did all these camps go? Walking around, I saw peoples lives everywhere. A Pictures From here, coffee mug, pots, toothbrush, and toys. We had a road sign from Mississippi under our camp. That I couldn't believe. Also, talking to a friend, a lady called him and said she found his seadoo in Holly Beach. :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8250
Age: 52
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

#74 Postby jasons2k » Thu Sep 29, 2005 5:17 pm

Surge, the most massive surge we have seen. The sea-doo wasn't blown to Holly Beach.

I make these comments with a heavy heart. I can't imagine the heartache and distress. But I'm just trying to be accurate.
0 likes   

User avatar
LAwxrgal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1763
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:05 pm
Location: Reserve, LA (30 mi west of NOLA)

#75 Postby LAwxrgal » Thu Sep 29, 2005 5:22 pm

What exactly is SFMR and how accurate is it?

The data I've seen says it was already at 125 mph (which is Cat 3 status) at its 3rd landfall on the MS coast.
0 likes   
Andrew 92/Isidore & Lili 02/Bill 03/Katrina & Rita 05/Gustav & Ike 08/Isaac 12 (flooded my house)/Harvey 17/Barry 19/Cristobal 20/Claudette 21/Ida 21 (In the Eye)/Francine 24
Wake me up when November ends

User avatar
artist
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9792
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 3:26 pm
Location: West Palm

#76 Postby artist » Thu Sep 29, 2005 5:40 pm

the damage seemed to be hit and miss as well. Wonder if there were tornadoes? Some of that reminds me of tornado damage - it skips, etc.
.
0 likes   

User avatar
LAwxrgal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1763
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:05 pm
Location: Reserve, LA (30 mi west of NOLA)

#77 Postby LAwxrgal » Thu Sep 29, 2005 5:45 pm

artist wrote:the damage seemed to be hit and miss as well. Wonder if there were tornadoes? Some of that reminds me of tornado damage - it skips, etc.
.


I've heard there were mini-vortices, which were mini tornadoes, which caused the wind damage that took place. Now, I wasn't here for Katrina, I had skipped town :lol: so take what I say with a grain of salt.
0 likes   
Andrew 92/Isidore & Lili 02/Bill 03/Katrina & Rita 05/Gustav & Ike 08/Isaac 12 (flooded my house)/Harvey 17/Barry 19/Cristobal 20/Claudette 21/Ida 21 (In the Eye)/Francine 24
Wake me up when November ends

donsutherland1
S2K Analyst
S2K Analyst
Posts: 2718
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: New York

#78 Postby donsutherland1 » Thu Sep 29, 2005 5:52 pm

LAwxrgal,

SFMR's reliability in major hurricanes is questionable.
0 likes   

User avatar
LAwxrgal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1763
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:05 pm
Location: Reserve, LA (30 mi west of NOLA)

#79 Postby LAwxrgal » Thu Sep 29, 2005 5:57 pm

donsutherland1 wrote:LAwxrgal,

SFMR's reliability in major hurricanes is questionable.


Okay, gotcha. Is it the same thing as HRD? Or is HRD something different, and therefore more accurate?
0 likes   
Andrew 92/Isidore & Lili 02/Bill 03/Katrina & Rita 05/Gustav & Ike 08/Isaac 12 (flooded my house)/Harvey 17/Barry 19/Cristobal 20/Claudette 21/Ida 21 (In the Eye)/Francine 24
Wake me up when November ends

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#80 Postby wxmann_91 » Thu Sep 29, 2005 6:19 pm

There is just no way to completely accurately measure wind speeds.

SFMR had problems just a day before landfall, so it isn't out of the realm of possibility that it had problems during landfall also. Damage reports can be conflicting due to localized stronger gusts and vortices, and the fact that Katrina was a large hurricane. Even anemometer measurements are questionable because they can be above the ground or they measured a gust. Recon was in Katrina but something broke just before landfall that recon wasn't able to measure flight-level winds, and even then, the reduction rate is tricky. Doppler velocities can be inaccurate also.

So, any way you cut it, I'd have to say that the NHC estimate is pretty good, Cat 4 at LA landfall, borderline 3/4 at MS landfall.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MadaTheConquistador, ncforecaster89, Teban54 and 52 guests