One of my local meteorologists says Rita's surge was in the neighborhood of fifteen feet.
Looking at some of the pictures from Holly Beach and Cameron and other places, there's no way in my mind that her surge was that low. I think it was in the neighborhood of 20-25 feet, I fear a really high number when it's all said and done.
Do you guys (and gals) think it was that high? Or is my local met right when he says 15 feet?
Question about Rita's storm surge
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- LAwxrgal
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 1763
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:05 pm
- Location: Reserve, LA (30 mi west of NOLA)
Question about Rita's storm surge
0 likes
Andrew 92/Isidore & Lili 02/Bill 03/Katrina & Rita 05/Gustav & Ike 08/Isaac 12 (flooded my house)/Harvey 17/Barry 19/Cristobal 20/Claudette 21/Ida 21 (In the Eye)/Francine 24
Wake me up when November ends
Wake me up when November ends
-
SamSagnella
- Category 2

- Posts: 630
- Age: 39
- Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:02 pm
- Location: Westport, CT
- Contact:
-
curtadams
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 1122
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:57 pm
- Location: Orange, California
- Contact:
Probably all 1 story buildings. 10 feet of surge would put them entirely underwater and hurricane waves would have taken them out. So, that pic doesn't prove particularly fearsome conditions. I don't think the surge was 20 feet because inland areas nearby would have gotten almost the same surge and 2-story buildings in Cameron were not flooded to the rafters.
0 likes
-
jax
- Weatherfreak14
- Category 5

- Posts: 1383
- Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 3:40 pm
- Location: Beaufort, SC
- Contact:
6-10 feet of flooding, even less, with waves from Cat 3 winds, could wash away a town.
I bet some waves went 25 feet high, breakers rolled over Cameron, but the actual rise in sea level was maybe 8-10 feet (maybe more, but didn't need to be); water level would rise higher in some bays, bayous and beaches because of topography and wind piling up water in constricted areas.
It's hard to connect storm surge and damage, since surge is just the sea level during the storm, but the water with the wind does a lot more than sit quietly at that "surge" level.
Imagine your house sitting in the middle of a large, smooth lake, with five feet of water in your yard. No problem, except your furniture is floating. Now add 100 mph winds, and great big waves running through that water all around your house. Big problem. Waves break over the roof and tear your house apart. IMO, this is what confuses the public about storm surge.
I bet some waves went 25 feet high, breakers rolled over Cameron, but the actual rise in sea level was maybe 8-10 feet (maybe more, but didn't need to be); water level would rise higher in some bays, bayous and beaches because of topography and wind piling up water in constricted areas.
It's hard to connect storm surge and damage, since surge is just the sea level during the storm, but the water with the wind does a lot more than sit quietly at that "surge" level.
Imagine your house sitting in the middle of a large, smooth lake, with five feet of water in your yard. No problem, except your furniture is floating. Now add 100 mph winds, and great big waves running through that water all around your house. Big problem. Waves break over the roof and tear your house apart. IMO, this is what confuses the public about storm surge.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 385 guests
