Frightening Early Image From Cameron, LA

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
FunkMasterB
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 96
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 2:24 am

#41 Postby FunkMasterB » Sun Sep 25, 2005 2:09 pm

It's definitely Holly Beach.

Lots of pictures of Holly Beach, Cameron, Johnson's Bayou, etc here:

http://www.azstarnet.com/

Scroll down to 'Latest Pictures from the Gulf' under the story 'Perry Flies Over Texas Cities...'

Holly Beach and Johnson's Bayou are no more. Gone. Cameron is completely flooded, but some, maybe most, buildings are still standing.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#42 Postby wxmann_91 » Sun Sep 25, 2005 2:17 pm

These are from Cameron:

Image

Image




This is from Holly Beach:

Image

(BTW source from the above site)
0 likes   

User avatar
JtSmarts
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1442
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 1:29 pm
Location: Columbia, South Carolina

#43 Postby JtSmarts » Sun Sep 25, 2005 2:18 pm

Looks like Holly Beach especially was ground zero, nothing left there.
0 likes   

kevin

#44 Postby kevin » Sun Sep 25, 2005 2:21 pm

Are we sure this is legit??? I mean the source was a message board which gives a source... and its hosted by the associated press and has as part of the tag WX but that looks simply incredible. Wish there was a link to a story where that image was included...
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#45 Postby jkt21787 » Sun Sep 25, 2005 2:21 pm

kevin wrote:Are we sure this is legit??? I mean the source was a message board which gives a source... and its hosted by the associated press and has as part of the tag WX but that looks simply incredible. Wish there was a link to a story where that image was included...

Do you just not want to believe this? Why and how could these be faked?
0 likes   

Anonymous

#46 Postby Anonymous » Sun Sep 25, 2005 2:24 pm

tallywx wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:its a legit question

sorry to burst some bubbles here, but it is very possible that some strms in the past weren't cat 4's. It's important to determine this so that we can make better preps in the future for a cat 3

some here could attempt to better learn atmospheric dynamics


Derek, you make a good point. After all, Audrey's central pressure at landfall was 946 mb. Unless she was the tiny size of Hurricane Charley, it's EXTREMELY difficult to believe she was carrying 145 mph winds at that time, which is what the current post-track analysis shows.


I own radar loops of Hurricane Audrey...I find it difficult that the storm was weaker than 145 mph.
0 likes   

User avatar
Dr. Jonah Rainwater
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 569
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 2:45 pm
Location: Frisco, Texas
Contact:

#47 Postby Dr. Jonah Rainwater » Sun Sep 25, 2005 2:26 pm

Well it seems odd because all the other surge damage photos show houses swamped in 10 feet of water and missing walls and that sort of thing, but these images show an absolutely wiped landscape. With no landmarks except for what looks like the remainder of a paved road, which suggests it isn't Indonesia. But you'd think the media would be swarming over this area, since the devastation is so graphic and complete.
0 likes   

User avatar
JtSmarts
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1442
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 1:29 pm
Location: Columbia, South Carolina

#48 Postby JtSmarts » Sun Sep 25, 2005 2:28 pm

~Floydbuster wrote:
tallywx wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:its a legit question

sorry to burst some bubbles here, but it is very possible that some strms in the past weren't cat 4's. It's important to determine this so that we can make better preps in the future for a cat 3

some here could attempt to better learn atmospheric dynamics


Derek, you make a good point. After all, Audrey's central pressure at landfall was 946 mb. Unless she was the tiny size of Hurricane Charley, it's EXTREMELY difficult to believe she was carrying 145 mph winds at that time, which is what the current post-track analysis shows.


I own radar loops of Hurricane Audrey...I find it difficult that the storm was weaker than 145 mph.


If Audrey was a small storm and getting stronger at landfall I could very well see 145-946. That would make her similar to Charley was also a a tight system with 150mph winds 941 pressure.
0 likes   

User avatar
JtSmarts
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1442
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 1:29 pm
Location: Columbia, South Carolina

#49 Postby JtSmarts » Sun Sep 25, 2005 2:30 pm

Dr. Jonah Rainwater wrote:Well it seems odd because all the other surge damage photos show houses swamped in 10 feet of water and missing walls and that sort of thing, but these images show an absolutely wiped landscape. With no landmarks except for what looks like the remainder of a paved road, which suggests it isn't Indonesia. But you'd think the media would be swarming over this area, since the devastation is so graphic and complete.


You're right Jonah it is very strange. I haven't see many reports on this area at all. The media seems to be focused still on Houston and N.O, with a little coverage of the Port Arthur/Beaumont areas.
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#50 Postby jkt21787 » Sun Sep 25, 2005 2:31 pm

Dr. Jonah Rainwater wrote:Well it seems odd because all the other surge damage photos show houses swamped in 10 feet of water and missing walls and that sort of thing, but these images show an absolutely wiped landscape. With no landmarks except for what looks like the remainder of a paved road, which suggests it isn't Indonesia. But you'd think the media would be swarming over this area, since the devastation is so graphic and complete.

Yeah, I understand your concern, especially since the media isn't all over it. I just don't see how it could be faked though.

It would certainly be embarrasing if these were faked since they went over the Associated Press Wires.
0 likes   

simplykristi
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1220
Joined: Sat May 10, 2003 1:59 pm
Location: Near KCMO
Contact:

#51 Postby simplykristi » Sun Sep 25, 2005 2:34 pm

I do believe thise pics are real. The media has NO access to those small communities. The media is in communities like Lake Charles and Abbeville.

Kristi
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#52 Postby jkt21787 » Sun Sep 25, 2005 2:35 pm

What I think about is Waveland, MS. There were no reports or pictures on the media for days there either. We know now how that town fared... :(
0 likes   

User avatar
HurricaneQueen
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1011
Age: 80
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 7:36 pm
Location: No. Naples, Fl (Vanderbilt Beach area)

#53 Postby HurricaneQueen » Sun Sep 25, 2005 2:37 pm

CNN just announced that they will be doing a live flyover of Cameron Parish with Gen. Honore (sp?) in a short while (@5pm EDT).

Lynn
0 likes   
GO FLORIDA GATORS

User avatar
HollynLA
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 836
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:36 pm
Location: South Louisiana

#54 Postby HollynLA » Sun Sep 25, 2005 2:38 pm

Even CNN is showing similar pictures of Holly Beach on their website. It's real pictures. I've been to Holly Beach many times as a child. There were many camps right on the water and many were old wood frame camp homes. If the media would show more of this instead of focusing on downed stop lights and broke trees, more people would not want to stay near the coast during a hurricane.
0 likes   

User avatar
arkess7
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2071
Age: 52
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 3:25 pm
Location: Edgewater, FL

#55 Postby arkess7 » Sun Sep 25, 2005 2:46 pm

wow how awful :cry: ......theres no way those pic. can be fake.......why would anyone even say that? :grr:
0 likes   

User avatar
vacanechaser
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1461
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Portsmouth, Va
Contact:

#56 Postby vacanechaser » Sun Sep 25, 2005 3:37 pm

One thing mentioned about the SLOSH model, we saw first hand a comparison of two storms in 2004 using that model by Max at a talk he gave in Florida in June. The size of the storms eye seems to play a huge role in the surge amount as well. Charley small surge relative to the wind speed. But, when Max showed the same position with the same forward speed and the same wind speed as Charley but used Frances' eye, big jump in surge and in coverage.. Photo of Frances overlay below. So in the true scheme of things, size does matter.. :wink:

Image

So what I am saying is that maybe Audrey was a smaller storm but still had winds of 145mph. I think this helps shed some light on that.


Jesse V. Bass III
http://www.vastormphoto.com
Hurricane Intercept Research Team
0 likes   
Jesse V. Bass III
http://www.vastormphoto.com
Hurricane Intercept Research Team

User avatar
wlfpack81
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 417
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2003 11:19 am
Location: Arlington, VA
Contact:

#57 Postby wlfpack81 » Sun Sep 25, 2005 3:58 pm

jkt21787 wrote:Do you just not want to believe this? Why and how could these be faked?


I've been trying to stay away from this debate b/c I don't want to flame. But let me tell you the reason jkt21787 people don't want to believe this (or initially didn't want to believe that Katrina did what she did). A lot think that b/c this is America we're immune to tremendous natural disasters. People need to wake up. Doesn't matter that we're the richest country or have the biggest and best dang military force. We're still vulnerable to get hit hard by Mother Nature!!! I don't know what it's going to take to wake people up. These same people are going to be surprised at the destruction they see when the big one finally levels San Fran to the ground.
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

#58 Postby Thunder44 » Sun Sep 25, 2005 4:20 pm

Fox News showing new video aeirals of Southern LA that look like that this area. Some houses look like they been wiped off their foundations. :eek:
0 likes   

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

#59 Postby WeatherEmperor » Sun Sep 25, 2005 4:22 pm

wlfpack81 wrote:
jkt21787 wrote:Do you just not want to believe this? Why and how could these be faked?


I've been trying to stay away from this debate b/c I don't want to flame. But let me tell you the reason jkt21787 people don't want to believe this (or initially didn't want to believe that Katrina did what she did). A lot think that b/c this is America we're immune to tremendous natural disasters. People need to wake up. Doesn't matter that we're the richest country or have the biggest and best dang military force. We're still vulnerable to get hit hard by Mother Nature!!! I don't know what it's going to take to wake people up. These same people are going to be surprised at the destruction they see when the big one finally levels San Fran to the ground.


That is very very true.

<RICKY>
0 likes   

gpickett00
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 262
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 8:47 pm
Location: Satellite Beach Florida
Contact:

#60 Postby gpickett00 » Sun Sep 25, 2005 4:29 pm

I remember somebody from NC was trying to compare Rita to Ophelia.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MarioProtVI, TheHurricaneGod and 68 guests