Rita,Comments,Sat Pics,Models Thread
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- HouTXmetro
- Category 5

- Posts: 3949
- Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
- Location: District of Columbia, USA
sounds like bobble watching to me....neither microscale track or speed bobbles have much to do with final landfall 3.5 days out.
if you have a particular fish of interest in the gulf i guess worrying about it is your right......if you live on the texas coast however, and are worried about landfall...nothing that is happening now really has any effect on you.
if you have a particular fish of interest in the gulf i guess worrying about it is your right......if you live on the texas coast however, and are worried about landfall...nothing that is happening now really has any effect on you.
0 likes
- Canelaw99
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 2128
- Age: 49
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:27 am
- Location: Homestead, FL
I would be more concerned about this from a Floridian's point of view. I admit I have no meterological knowledge and don't understand entirely the way all the synoptics are setting up to control Rita's path. However, it would seem to me that if she were, in fact, slowing because the high is weakening, it would allow her to move north sooner potentially impacting someplace besides Texas. Now, that may not be right at all, but it seems to be a legit question, perhaps someone who is a met/met student/etc. could shed light on it for me? 
0 likes
99...if the models and upper air research is so far off that the high is eroded and she is beginning her turn north than we are all in a world of hurt.
but thats not the case...and the high will hold for many many more hours..the only question is really 2-3 days down the road.
in summary....."bobbles".
but thats not the case...and the high will hold for many many more hours..the only question is really 2-3 days down the road.
in summary....."bobbles".
0 likes
-
corpusbreeze
- Category 1

- Posts: 386
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 3:57 pm
djtil wrote:sounds like bobble watching to me....neither microscale track or speed bobbles have much to do with final landfall 3.5 days out.
if you have a particular fish of interest in the gulf i guess worrying about it is your right......if you live on the texas coast however, and are worried about landfall...nothing that is happening now really has any effect on you.
I completely disagree. What happens now is important. It impacts timing. Timing is everything.
0 likes
- skysummit
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 5305
- Age: 49
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
- Location: Ponchatoula, LA
- Contact:
Now don't think I'm stupid for thinking this, but what if Rita defies all models? What I'm saying is you know how hurricanes tend to "stretch" in the direction they may be heading? For the past 2 days she's been "stretched" east and west, but now looking at WV, it looks like she's stretching more to the north.
Is there a chance that she's feeling that trough above her and could turn due north or even northeast and follow the weakness?
Is there a chance that she's feeling that trough above her and could turn due north or even northeast and follow the weakness?
0 likes
this is all i have to look at:
http://www.wunderground.com/data/640x480/huratl_slp.gif
and you seem to be implying that the nhc is tied down to the models to a fault....do you really give them that little credit...that if they were thrown a suite of models that were all incorrect that they couldnt see that in a few seconds after studying upper air data?
oh...theres a reason...shes a developing hurricane.
http://www.wunderground.com/data/640x480/huratl_slp.gif
and you seem to be implying that the nhc is tied down to the models to a fault....do you really give them that little credit...that if they were thrown a suite of models that were all incorrect that they couldnt see that in a few seconds after studying upper air data?
If she indeed did slow a bit, maybe there's a reason.
oh...theres a reason...shes a developing hurricane.
0 likes
- skysummit
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 5305
- Age: 49
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
- Location: Ponchatoula, LA
- Contact:
djtil wrote:this is all i have to look at:
http://www.wunderground.com/data/640x480/huratl_slp.gif
and you seem to be implying that the nhc is tied down to the models to a fault....do you really give them that little credit...that if they were thrown a suite of models that were all incorrect that they couldnt see that in a few seconds after studying upper air data?
I would appreciate if you kept personal feelings out of this. You saying "I seem to be implying" is out of line. All I asked about was the reasoning behind you saying no chance. If you would've backed up your statement the first time, I wouldn't have asked.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: kenayers and 317 guests



