Video from Gulfport...Ground Zero...No words

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9492
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

#21 Postby ROCK » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:18 pm

BlowinNTheWind wrote:
TropicalJon wrote:WOW....I think to this point most of the main stream media does not have a clue what this storm has done.



Tomorow will be the day everyone finally realizes how bad this storm was



hard for me to type what Im feeling after seeing that.........All of us need to donate relief to these people...... anything, case of water, can foods...something.....
0 likes   

User avatar
Hyperstorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:48 am
Location: Ocala, FL

#22 Postby Hyperstorm » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:19 pm

And these were ONLY real Category 3 conditions...

Imagine a full brunt of a 170 mph hurricane!

The United States is definitely not prepared to deal with these monsters...
0 likes   

MKT2005

#23 Postby MKT2005 » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:19 pm

Very little flooding it looks like, which is one good thing.
0 likes   

User avatar
NC George
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 635
Age: 55
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 11:44 am
Location: Washington, NC, USA

#24 Postby NC George » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:19 pm

I'll still waiting for it to download (darned dialup) but I will say this, if a storm is coming and Sudduth is there - run for your life as far away as possible.
0 likes   

frankthetank
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 527
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:16 pm
Location: La Crosse, WI

#25 Postby frankthetank » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:21 pm

Notice how quiet it was? Just wind...

horrifying...
0 likes   

User avatar
Mobile Expat
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 1:59 am
Location: Knoxville, TN
Contact:

#26 Postby Mobile Expat » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:21 pm

BlowinNTheWind wrote:Amazing video...and that is not even taken on HWY 90 which is the closest road to the water


That was the intersection of Hwy 49 and Hwy 90, I believe. Anybody know for sure?
0 likes   

djtil
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 699
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 10:09 am

#27 Postby djtil » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:22 pm

refamiliarize yourselves with camille...that video was impressive but nothing compared to some of these images....

http://www.geocities.com/hurricanene/hurricanecamille.htm
Last edited by djtil on Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hyperstorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:48 am
Location: Ocala, FL

#28 Postby Hyperstorm » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:26 pm

Hyperstorm wrote:And these were ONLY real Category 3 conditions...

Imagine a full brunt of a 170 mph hurricane!

The United States is definitely not prepared to deal with these monsters...


Regarding my previous post...

I'm now starting to suspect about the Air Force Recon SFMR values that indicated 170 mph winds reaching the surface.

We DEFINITELY need to analyze these winds because if they are found to be correct, it is possible Katrina might be upgraded to a Category 5 hurricane in re-analysis, with winds of 170 mph over a VERY localized area...which happened to go right over the Gulf coast of Mississippi...
0 likes   

djtil
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 699
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 10:09 am

#29 Postby djtil » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:27 pm

i doubt it....140mph could have easily caused that damage. there wasnt anything close to 170 even at flight level.
0 likes   

Coredesat

#30 Postby Coredesat » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:29 pm

Wow. :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
CronkPSU
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2021
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:44 pm
Location: Avalon Park, FL

#31 Postby CronkPSU » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:29 pm

djtil wrote:i doubt it....140mph could have easily caused that damage. there wasnt anything close to 170 even at flight level.


i'll wait for the re-analysis, but it sure seems odd to have that kind of monster low pressure and only 140 mph winds
0 likes   

User avatar
Hyperstorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:48 am
Location: Ocala, FL

#32 Postby Hyperstorm » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:30 pm

djtil wrote:i doubt it....140mph could have easily caused that damage. there wasnt anything close to 170 even at flight level.


Based on past storms history, the TPC has usually put in slightly more weight on SFMR winds than FL level when it comes to upgrading/downgrading storms.

I, too, HIGHLY doubt that these winds are REPRESENTATIVE, BUT they MUST be analyzed...
0 likes   

djtil
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 699
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 10:09 am

#33 Postby djtil » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:31 pm

based on the broadening wind field due to the ewrc it seems reasonable...not to mention that we have multiple recon passes leading up to landfall....none showing more than 150 flight level for around 12 hours.

and the main point is that 170mph isnt needed to do the damage seen in that video. look at all the trees standing.....probably none left if it were 170mph.
Last edited by djtil on Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Mobile Expat
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 1:59 am
Location: Knoxville, TN
Contact:

#34 Postby Mobile Expat » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:33 pm

TropicalJon wrote:WOW....I think to this point most of the main stream media does not have a clue what this storm has done.


No, they don't. I don't think any of us know how bad this is yet. Tomorrow will be a shocker, I fear.
0 likes   

gunner1551
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 143
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 12:08 pm

#35 Postby gunner1551 » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:33 pm

:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: that video clip should come with a warning!!! cant imagine that there could be a place harder hit,, only moring will tell us that
0 likes   

MKT2005

#36 Postby MKT2005 » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:35 pm

djtil wrote:based on the broadening wind field due to the ewrc it seems reasonable...not to mention that we have multiple recon passes leading up to landfall....none showing more than 150 flight level for around 12 hours.

and the main point is that 170mph isnt needed to do the damage seen in that video.


Yes Cat-4 winds can do catastrophic damage, if you don't think so just like at punta gorda.
0 likes   

Stratosphere747
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
Contact:

#37 Postby Stratosphere747 » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:37 pm

djtil wrote:based on the broadening wind field due to the ewrc it seems reasonable...not to mention that we have multiple recon passes leading up to landfall....none showing more than 150 flight level for around 12 hours.

and the main point is that 170mph isnt needed to do the damage seen in that video.


There was some arguement earlier that pressure did not correspond to storm surge.

Being that these landfalling storms are such a rarity, I'm beginning to wonder?

The damage we see from Pass Christian and BSL along with the inital landfall in Louisiana will be from surge, and it may be comparable to Camille.
0 likes   

djtil
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 699
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 10:09 am

#38 Postby djtil » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:39 pm

the surge correlates with wind speed and history of that wind speed (in addition to geography).....the pressure is irrelevant other than the fact that it typically correlates with the wind.

THERE IS NO LOW PRESSURE VACUUM
0 likes   

User avatar
Hyperstorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:48 am
Location: Ocala, FL

#39 Postby Hyperstorm » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:41 pm

MKT2005 wrote:
djtil wrote:based on the broadening wind field due to the ewrc it seems reasonable...not to mention that we have multiple recon passes leading up to landfall....none showing more than 150 flight level for around 12 hours.

and the main point is that 170mph isnt needed to do the damage seen in that video.


Yes Cat-4 winds can do catastrophic damage, if you don't think so just like at punta gorda.


Yes, but this is an area that supposedly received CATEGORY 3 conditions. By the time the storm was nearing the MS coast, the official winds were in the CATEGORY 3 range.

This kind of damage is something you DON'T see in a Category 3, unless the structures are very poorly built.

This is EXTREME damage in my book...
0 likes   

User avatar
soney
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 47
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 9:22 pm
Location: San Antonio, Texas

#40 Postby soney » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:43 pm

My gosh, it's hard to imagine I was just there June 24th. Everything is gone, everything.

I'm not even certain where that was shot because of the destruction, but I think the building where my best friend worked was in there and the windows were blown out (the 15 story building).

This will be all over the news tomorrow, I don't see how it can't.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Hammy, HurricaneFan, wwizard and 329 guests