Why are they saying NO might not flood?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
arcticfire
- Tropical Storm

- Posts: 189
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 1:58 am
- Location: Anchorage, AK
- Contact:
Why are they saying NO might not flood?
My question is this , it was my understanding a direct S-N hit on the NOLA metro area was not the real threat. The real threat was it passing just south and then east of NO. Because after it passes NOLA latitude then the wind would come from the N->S and push the water from the lake twords the city? But I'm hearing on some of the news channels them thinking NOLA might be spared the worst case scenario , yet from what I can see the track is the worst case scenario. Anyone confirm or correct my understanding ?
0 likes
-
TPACane04
- x-y-no
- Category 5

- Posts: 8359
- Age: 65
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
You're correct, but the hope apparently is that the storm has weakened enough and the storm is passing far enough east (about 25 to 30 mile, it appears to me) that the storm surge won't be so high.
Winds there are shifting round to the north and soon slightly west of north, so the next hour or two will tell the tale.
Winds there are shifting round to the north and soon slightly west of north, so the next hour or two will tell the tale.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 160 guests



