NOLA mayor says winds 140
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
WaryEye wrote:It appears that FOX is representing lots of things this evening based on nothing factual whatsoever.
Re-read the original post. It wasn't FOX that represented it. It was the Biloxi Mayor. I heard it too.
Last edited by wolfmmiii on Sun Aug 28, 2005 9:36 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes
-
AlabamaDave
- Tropical Storm

- Posts: 169
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 6:44 pm
-
steveklein
-
NorthGaWeather
steveklein wrote:based on satellite imagery, i'd say the thing has weakened a good bit in the last few hours. i've seen cat 3's with better formed eyewalls than this thing right now.
maybe it is an ERC, maybe not. whether it is an ERC or not, it appears that at this moment, it is NOT a category 5 storm.
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.
0 likes
first of all, it was the Biloxi mayor...
second of all...it is very easy to get 140 knots mixed up with 140 mph...
I'm not saying that this FOR SURE is a 140 knot storm right now, but I would really surprised if it was downgraded to 140 mph
and third of all...steveklein...ARE YOU NUTS?!
please show me a category 3 hurricane with a better eye structure than this! I am really curious as to which hurricane you have in mind...
second of all...it is very easy to get 140 knots mixed up with 140 mph...
I'm not saying that this FOR SURE is a 140 knot storm right now, but I would really surprised if it was downgraded to 140 mph
and third of all...steveklein...ARE YOU NUTS?!
please show me a category 3 hurricane with a better eye structure than this! I am really curious as to which hurricane you have in mind...
0 likes
- ConvergenceZone
- Category 5

- Posts: 5240
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
- Location: Northern California
I don't see it weakening to 140 on this next update(in about 20 minutes), perhaps 155 or MAYBE 150, due to the interaction of a couple of waves moving into it(which Lyons pointed out), but I can't see it being weaker then that. Still think it will make landfall at 145 mph which would still be awful!
0 likes
I just heard some of this too, he said 140 in NO and 160+ near the Louisiana/Mississippi line. Also said they are going on the record with 60-70% of N.O. to be flooded this time tomorrow.
Some of the replies in this post made me laugh.
Thanks for keeping up the sarcasm... it keeps me from being nauseated.
Some of the replies in this post made me laugh.
Thanks for keeping up the sarcasm... it keeps me from being nauseated.
0 likes
- ConvergenceZone
- Category 5

- Posts: 5240
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
- Location: Northern California
- ConvergenceZone
- Category 5

- Posts: 5240
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
- Location: Northern California
One thing to point out there. They kept the winds at 160 mph, but mention the following below. Perhaps they need to get a pressure reading before making any adjustments on the winds. Reports will now be coming in every 2 hours as opposed to 3, so we'll have a more accurate representation on winds on the next update as we should have a recon report by that time.
"An Air Force Reserve unit reconnaissance aircraft will be reaching the
center of Katrina very shortly."
"An Air Force Reserve unit reconnaissance aircraft will be reaching the
center of Katrina very shortly."
0 likes
- ConvergenceZone
- Category 5

- Posts: 5240
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
- Location: Northern California
This latest discussion just issues also mentions that some weakening may be underway or that it may be weaker than what they are showing due to conflicting reports. I guess we will know soon enough. This is an interesting read though.
http://www.wunderground.com/tropical/at200512.disc.html
http://www.wunderground.com/tropical/at200512.disc.html
0 likes
- LSU2001
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 1711
- Age: 58
- Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 11:01 pm
- Location: Cut Off, Louisiana
JQ Public wrote:But i think 140 is right on the money b/c by the time it gets to NO it would have gone over at least 50 miles of land. 140 is devastating though and I don't understand how this is really anything weak to begin with.
NO fifty miles of marsh, lakes, and bays. very little land and 0 high ground.
It will weaken very, very slowly.
TIM
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
Brent
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 38266
- Age: 37
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
- Contact:
steveklein wrote:based on satellite imagery, i'd say the thing has weakened a good bit in the last few hours. i've seen cat 3's with better formed eyewalls than this thing right now.
maybe it is an ERC, maybe not. whether it is an ERC or not, it appears that at this moment, it is NOT a category 5 storm.
Someone please shoot me...
0 likes
#neversummer
- Cookiely
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 3211
- Age: 74
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 7:31 am
- Location: Tampa, Florida
Brent wrote:steveklein wrote:based on satellite imagery, i'd say the thing has weakened a good bit in the last few hours. i've seen cat 3's with better formed eyewalls than this thing right now.
maybe it is an ERC, maybe not. whether it is an ERC or not, it appears that at this moment, it is NOT a category 5 storm.
Someone please shoot me...
I'll stand behind you Brent so the bullet can pass through us both, and save an extra bullet.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 239 guests


