Katrina intensity "Fluctuating"?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
otowntiger
- Category 5

- Posts: 1932
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:06 pm
Katrina intensity "Fluctuating"?
On IR sat. she doesn't seem as impressive as earlier this morning. The eye has filled in and convection appears to have shrunk slightly. I'm no met., just amateur observation. Any professional mets have an opinion?
0 likes
-
rainstorm
-
otowntiger
- Category 5

- Posts: 1932
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:06 pm
rainstorm wrote:god may be answering our prayers today. it looks to me as if dry air is hitting it hard
That would be great and quite a relief for everyone if that is happening. But once again if it is significanly affected in that way unexpected weakening, isn't it pitiful that the NHC or anyone else for that matter are clueless?
0 likes
-
krysof
-
otowntiger
- Category 5

- Posts: 1932
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:06 pm
djtil wrote:isn't it pitiful that the NHC or anyone else for that matter are clueless?
lol......speaking of clueless.
I'm speaking of intensity forecasting, which they (NHC) readily admit is still a mystery. I am hardly clueless. I'm a veteran of a number of storms and have been tracking them since I was in the 5th grade in Baton Rouge, thats nearly 30 years of avid storm watching. My comment still stands that IF this storm were to weaken unexpectedly (and that has happenned time and time again with these north gulf coast landfalling hurricanes) it is a shame that the NHC still has no clue as to why storms strengthen suddenly or weaken.
0 likes
-
inotherwords
- Category 2

- Posts: 773
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 9:04 pm
- Location: Nokomis, FL
I don't think that makes the NHC "clueless," I just think it proves that hurricanes and weather prediction is not an exact science and that there are some things we don't fully understand yet.
"Clueless" insinuates stupidity. I think that's a bad choice of words here, but that you probably didn't mean it that way.
"Clueless" insinuates stupidity. I think that's a bad choice of words here, but that you probably didn't mean it that way.
0 likes
Stagnating a little, though lots of deep convection in the outer bands.
http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tc_pages/tc_home.html
EDIT: long link removed, shorter link inserted
http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tc_pages/tc_home.html
EDIT: long link removed, shorter link inserted
Last edited by oneness on Sat Aug 27, 2005 10:28 am, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes
-
txwatcher91
- Category 5

- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm
wxmann_91 wrote:EWRC. Look closely on the latest frame and one will see an inner eyewall and an outer eyewall, in between those is the moat.
Yep, definately an Eyewall replacement cycle. Look at this visible loop, and you can see the old eye fade away and the new one taking its place.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html
A well defined eye is possible by this afternoon IMO.
0 likes
Looks like there's a well defined eye already under this new outflow pulse emerging from the core and beginning to wisp-off the convective tops around the core. You can see the distinct arc-band of upper-level wispy clouds moving out and radially away from the system, from when this ERC collapse started.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 103 guests



