The NWS rules governing the naming of tropical cyclones specify
that...within a basin...when a cyclone forms from the remnant of a
previously existing cyclone...the old name/number is retained.
Tropical Depression Twelve has a complex genesis that likely
includes a mid-level remnant of former Tropical Depression Ten. A
review of satellite and rawinsonde data over the past week or so
suggests that a second disturbance approached and combined with the
mid-level remnant of Tropical Depression Ten on 20 August. Because
it is impossible to determine which of these two systems is
associated with today's genesis...we have elected to use the
designation twelve rather than ten for the new depression. This
situation differs from last year's regeneration of Ivan...in which
the low-level remnant of that system remained a distinct feature
that could be followed continuously until it regenerated.
Forecaster Stewart
Why 12 and not 10
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
chadtm80
Why 12 and not 10
From the discussion
0 likes
Re: Why 12 and not 10
chadtm80 wrote:From the discussionThe NWS rules governing the naming of tropical cyclones specify
that...within a basin...when a cyclone forms from the remnant of a
previously existing cyclone...the old name/number is retained.
Tropical Depression Twelve has a complex genesis that likely
includes a mid-level remnant of former Tropical Depression Ten. A
review of satellite and rawinsonde data over the past week or so
suggests that a second disturbance approached and combined with the
mid-level remnant of Tropical Depression Ten on 20 August. Because
it is impossible to determine which of these two systems is
associated with today's genesis...we have elected to use the
designation twelve rather than ten for the new depression. This
situation differs from last year's regeneration of Ivan...in which
the low-level remnant of that system remained a distinct feature
that could be followed continuously until it regenerated.
Forecaster Stewart
They went with 12, because I said that a TC over Arizona had a better chance of developing than did xTD10. So technically I was right, but I think 10 played at least some part in it. I had to send a Vermont Teddy bear to the NHC, but it was money well spent.
0 likes
- Portastorm
- Storm2k Moderator

- Posts: 9914
- Age: 63
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
- Location: Round Rock, TX
- Contact:
-
hurricanefreak1988
- Category 3

- Posts: 869
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 10:13 pm
- Location: Fayetteville, NC
- Contact:
- southerngale
- Retired Staff

- Posts: 27418
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
- Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)
Re: Why 12 and not 10
dwg71 wrote:
They went with 12, because I said that a TC over Arizona had a better chance of developing than did xTD10. So technically I was right, but I think 10 played at least some part in it. I had to send a Vermont Teddy bear to the NHC, but it was money well spent.
Those are so cute!
0 likes
-
Coredesat
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], riapal and 237 guests



